So no new real features in the Apple Watch series for at least 5 years. Shame but good for my wallet then.
What would you like it to do?So no new real features in the Apple Watch series for at least 5 years. Shame but good for my wallet then.
Blood pressure, blood glucose, an accurate blood oxygen measurement, breathing frequency, a functional ski workout that is more than a toy gimmick, an overhaul of the ring system that is useless to anyone doing sport a bit more intensively, etc..What would you like it to do?
All sound like great additions! I hope we get some (or all) of them eventually. For what it's worth though, I assume it will always say it isn't a medical device and to consult a doctor if feeling ill. No matter how accurate the measurements may get, they will cover their butts forever.Blood pressure, blood glucose, an accurate blood oxygen measurement, breathing frequency, a functional ski workout that is more than a toy gimmick, an overhaul of the ring system that is useless to anyone doing sport a bit more intensively, etc..
I can pull more if I scratch deeper.
60% of the time it works every time.How accurate though? The FDA allows glucose strips to be +-15% 95% of the time, which is pretty outrageous if you ask me.
The majority of people do not need monitoring during sports. I don’t think Apple is targeting 100% of the people 100% of the time, but it’s not like Apple‘s solution, whatever that is, wont improve over time.Modern CGM system already monitor your glucose levels very exact and during sports. If Apple can not achieve the same functionality, it is almost useless for the majority of people. For the others it is just a toy or gimmick. But monitoring is important during sports, measuring your glucose level with blood only takes seconds today.
What do you think all those data should be good for? Blood oxygen -> sports (Apple Fitness). Glucose data -> diabetic treatment / sports (Apple Fitness).The majority of people do not need monitoring during sports. I don’t think Apple is targeting 100% of the people 100% of the time, but it’s not like Apple‘s solution, whatever that is, wont improve over time.
Simply put: go check out k’watch. This exists and is currently in FDA trials. This will exist soon, but it’ll be even cooler when it’s in my Apple watch. I suspect Apple will put on language about how it’s not good enough, like with their other health sensors, but getting this tech out there will be a total game changer.
I'm looking forward to the Apple Watch squeezing my arm like those machines do at the doctor's office.Blood pressure probably would be more anticipated (and useful to more people).
I bought the Withings BPM Connect and tried it as soon as it arrived, probably did it wrong. It was squeezing so much that I thought it was going to cause damage to my arm. I hit the emergency quit button on it and I never tried it again. I remember how its supposed to squeeze from professionals doing it so unless I did something wrong, that product is dangerous.I'm looking forward to the Apple Watch squeezing my arm like those machines do at the doctor's office.![]()
I think you meant to quote the other person I replied to.I don't know what you think you've read but K'watch really isn't more than a prototype, certainly not an existing product that is in FDA trials.
K'watch isn't anything more than a prototype at this point and it certainly isn't in FDA trials, it had 1 clinical study (not a clinical trial, because it had no control group) which really is a first step of many.Simply put: go check out k’watch. This exists and is currently in FDA trials. This will exist soon, but it’ll be even cooler when it’s in my Apple watch. I suspect Apple will put on language about how it’s not good enough, like with their other health sensors, but getting this tech out there will be a total game changer.
Gurman believes this process "will take another three to seven years at least."
Basically means they got a promising concept, that will now go through study/trial phases, which take long time.That’s a nice tight prediction we can all work with.
How many clinical studies has the Apple Watch had?K'watch isn't anything more than a prototype at this point and it certainly isn't in FDA trials, it had 1 clinical study (not a clinical trial, because it had no control group) which really is a first step of many.
Also that first test wasn't very promising for anything more than glucose trends (which is useless for actual diabetic patients). And it still uses a patch (which you have to change weekly) and a needle (albeit micro-needles in this concept).
So basically incomparible to what Apple is trying which is non-invasive blood glucose monitoring. The non-invasive part is the game changer a slightly better patch/needle system isn't.
hundreds, with the biggest ones (I believe by Johnson and Princeton) having 100.000s of participants. Also FDA class-3 approved.How many clinical studies has the Apple Watch had?
So my trusty S6 will have to last me until S14?. That is good product value over time!.(sarcasm).
Will be massive for so many peoplePeople don’t understand how INSANE this tech would be. Blood glucose monitoring is one of the most important health tracking you can have. Keeping blood glucose low extends life, slows down (even reverses) aging, increase athletic performance, fights cancer, etc.