Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can't innovate my a$$

BTW has anyone actually seen one in public?
no because no one in reality would buy this trash. i've barely seen apple watches in general and those that i have are all the cheapest model possible cus everyone knows its a poor investment. even spending hundreds extra for stainless steel thats worth $10 is stupid. if i ever decided to get an apple watch any bands I buy are gonna be knockoffs
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleXXXa
I live in a place where paying 500-600$ for an apple watch is as unjustifiable as maybe paying 1300$ for it in the US or other first world countries. What I learned after people calling me a bunch of stuff, including stupid for paying 2 months of minimum wage for it is just trying to make people understand that choices are choices.

If I had the money I would get the Hermes one, I love leather straps and I bet that one is really good and I would get really pissed off if people started judging my choice.

Get over yourself people
o_O:confused::D
Wait... They sell Apple Watches on Mars?
 
  • Like
Reactions: justperry
Don't disagree the Hermes is hugely overpriced, as most AWs are. But there is also nothing elegant about the sports band. It's a piece of rubber -- and I say this as an owner of one. It is junky band, it looks like one. Don't care, I bought it because it is a disposable device, not a keepsake. No band is going to make the AW look truly elegant. It's not that kind of watch no matter what Johnny Ive declares.
Not at all. Sports band is simple. It is elegant.
You made me laugh. Are you suggesting Hermes is a "keepsake"?
 
Can someone clarify something?

A Series 2 38mm stainless steel case with a sport band is $549.

A Series 2 38mm stainless steel case with an "Etoupe swift leather double buckle cuff" is a whopping $1499.

So... the watches themselves are exactly the same right? How is a leather bracelet nearly $1000?

Okay, so I see the actual cuff is $689. So what else are you paying for? Watch faces?

Those who buy them are paying for their own stupidity or are just so rich they don't give a monkeys
 
Can someone clarify something?

A Series 2 38mm stainless steel case with a sport band is $549.

A Series 2 38mm stainless steel case with an "Etoupe swift leather double buckle cuff" is a whopping $1499.

So... the watches themselves are exactly the same right? How is a leather bracelet nearly $1000?

Okay, so I see the actual cuff is $689. So what else are you paying for? Watch faces?

You pay for the brand, the watch face, the orange box and I think all Hermes version also comes with a sports band
 
Looks nice, but that's way too much money for what you get in my opinion.

I was checking out Mini-Me dresses as a gift for my girlfriend and daughter (they were both born in October), so I found a nice Dolce & Gabbana Mini-Me set. Price? €790 for the child dress, €4000 for the mother's. They will be on sale for 70% off in a few months.

That's how fashion works.
 
really, really puzzled by some of the responses to this Apple + Hermes collaboration.

Those of you taking the time to post your negative, needless opinions do know that these NICHE offerings are made for a certain ilk of folks, right?

You're obviously not the target consumer for the product.

I can not wait to receive mine.
 
Don't disagree the Hermes is hugely overpriced, as most AWs are. But there is also nothing elegant about the sports band. It's a piece of rubber -- and I say this as an owner of one. It is junky band, it looks like one. Don't care, I bought it because it is a disposable device, not a keepsake. No band is going to make the AW look truly elegant. It's not that kind of watch no matter what Johnny Ive declares.

This right here sum up my opinion of the whole matter. Great watch but in the end, after maybe 3 years or so it will stop working and I'll either need to replace it or want to because the newer model is thinner.

It would suck if a $350 band was incompatible with the AW Series 3
 
really, really puzzled by some of the responses to this Apple + Hermes collaboration.

Those of you taking the time to post your negative, needless opinions do know that these NICHE offerings are made for a certain ilk of folks, right?

You're obviously not the target consumer for the product.

I can not wait to receive mine.

Geeks and fashion victims rarely overlap. This is one of the main reasons why the Watch was met with such heated hostility by the former group.
 
It is just a shame that the Hermes watch face is the only analogue face on an Apple Watch that is designed for a rectangular face whilst the stock ones are circular. I would love to be able to design my own that makes the Apple watch look like a real watch rather than a smart watch, but whilst they are charging a premium for the Hermes models that is unlikely to happen.

Will they be locking down our MacOS wallpaper next and selling iMacs in a fancy box for twice the price with the addition of a premium brand wallpaper.
 
I think the responses here make it clear that the average macrumors visitor may not be the exact target. The hardware and software is identical to the regular apple watch; you want access to that, just buy one of those. For a certain clientele who will be frequenting a store like Barney's, Bergdorf's, or the Hermes store, a few thousand dollars is milk money. And that's okay; it's not your money, so it's not your place to judge who gets to buy what. If that were a thing, couture, art, high end dining, niche fashion, luxury housing, boutique hotel, etc. would not be viable markets, but they are. I'm not planning on buying one of these Hermes watches, but a normal human reaction is to understand that there are people for whom 1) they are aethetically pleasing (which they are, 2) offer them a functionality they appreciate (i.e. the same that the cheaper watches offer, and 3) a small bump in price is reasonable to them. These straps are iconic Hermes designs dating back many decades, and to be able to offer that in CONJUNCTION with modern technology is a beautiful synthesis of aesthetic, fashion tradition, brand, and tech.

As for Hermes as a brand, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but their classic designs are iconic (watch straps, Birkin bag, scarves) and of high quality. Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, Hugo Boss, Ralph Lauren, Coach, Michael Kors it is not. Materials, stitching, handiwork, and legacy are vital to their brand, and yes, the price reflects that.
 
Looks nice, but that's way too much money for what you get in my opinion.
I bought the ss watch with the links band from Apple and it was about the same price, so I don't think it's too off price. Having said that I prefer the links band to a leather band.
 
  • Like
Reactions: S.B.G
Hermes = Trash. Just like other overpriced brand names. But through marketing, somehow they persuade lots of customers to buy, buy, buy.
I don't like these things either, but folks will praise the quality of Hermes leather.
No band is going to make the AW look truly elegant. It's not that kind of watch no matter what Johnny Ive declares.
Or this is the new "watch." Lots of folks said the iPhone in 2007 was either too big or needed buttons. Now all phones look like the iPhone.
 
I guess the most shocking thing to me is that they sold enough of the first Hermes AW to merit a second Hermes version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zync
As for Hermes as a brand, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but their classic designs are iconic (watch straps, Birkin bag, scarves) and of high quality. Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, Hugo Boss, Ralph Lauren, Coach, Michael Kors it is not. Materials, stitching, handiwork, and legacy are vital to their brand, and yes, the price reflects that.

This. I'm sure all of us have purchased something at a premium because we saw something in it that was just better than its competition. It's the same here. Once you handle or own an Hermes item, there is a noticeable difference in quality and that's what you're paying for. To one person it may just be a stupid band for a stupid watch, to others it's quality leatherwork and is aesthetically pleasing.
 
Can someone clarify something?

A Series 2 38mm stainless steel case with a sport band is $549.

A Series 2 38mm stainless steel case with an "Etoupe swift leather double buckle cuff" is a whopping $1499.

So... the watches themselves are exactly the same right? How is a leather bracelet nearly $1000?

Okay, so I see the actual cuff is $689. So what else are you paying for? Watch faces?
You're paying for the band, watch, the faces, the box, the inscribed Hermes on the back, the special bag it comes in

And of course the Hermes, I spent 13x more than this should cost experience
I saw a normal poplin button down shirt on there for around $550... what the ****
 
I'm guessing your mom doesn't know you didn't go to school today? :p:D Just so you know, if you act like your post reads, high school is going to be pretty rough on you.;)

I'm 42 yo dude and I'm rich, don't ask me how now u go and buy expensive things 4 ur females dont be cheap. I have rolex, bmw and everything
 
So people spend the extra money for the custom watch face? Because you'd be better off just buying the Watch Series 2 for $549 + Hermes Band for $339 on the Apple Store website. That's only $888 vs the $1199 Apple charges for them bundled together with the watch face. Is the watch face worth $311?
The premium is actually $261 (the 38mm is $1149) and it does come with an extra year of warranty and an orange Sport band this year, but yes, it is odd that there is still that much of a difference given that Apple sells the bands separately now.

That said, some of the models are already sold out (double-buckle cuff and deployment), while the other models have 5-10 week waiting periods online.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.