Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Making numbers up but truly seems 99% here will blindly defend their Daddy Apple. The mods here don’t seem to do anything about it at all.
Clearly you didn’t read the posts between your post and the story before making up your numbers. Seems more like 99% of the people posting before you blindly disparaged Daddy Apple.
 
Masimo look as though they may have a case regarding the method Apple use, but if you look at the latest Masimo watch then I'd be very surprised if that doesn't infringe Apple patents somewhere.

This is one occasion where perhaps Masimo and Apple would be better off reaching out of court settlement and perhaps even an agreement on incorporating future health related improvements, as Masimo's direction is 100% health related, a growing market, where it may be mutually beneficial to have agreement, and no doubt Apple will also implement more and more health related improvements to other devices.
They just got a patent upheld and you're now trying to claim they may be using Apple patents? Wow...
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Apple needs to be taught a lesson that they can't steal others IP, integrate it into their products and then cry foul and simply weasle their way out of it and pay a miniscule fine.

Agreed

Seems to be a bit of a trend here .. first the noise cancellation stuff, now the pulse oximetry stuff here ..
Not a good look for the most valuable company in the world with crazy product margins and ever increasing prices.

Pay for the rights to things you want to use Apple! -- stop stealing and then paying "wrist slap" penalties.
 
here we go, lawsuit time. Apple will not be held liable.
LMAO likely they will.

Even an appeal on this one I think Apple will loose, or may not even try. They'll most likely settle out of court with a lump sum + perpetual yearly fee for a 10yr payment done annually. The books will show this but not isolated.

Apple has a history of this, hiring/headhunting/poaching employees from rival companies and then low and behold, patents that Apple were not approved to use turn up in their products. Didn't this happen with with Qualcomm and Broadcom back in the day when they poached employees from those companies and didn't an ex-employee of a car company get arrested for stealing company files when poached by Apple for their Apple car project?
Agreed. In fact many Apple fans speak of Apple's mantra of refining new tech and make it easiest to use and implement.


Fun to look back at this thread for all the comments saying Masimo is wasting their time trying to sue Apple.
Good find!

we believe today's ruling exposes Apple as a company that takes other companies' innovations and repackages them."

^ Man that's gotta sting Tim Cook something painful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pdaholic and LD517
I guess, if Apple aren't successful on appeal they're in a spot of trouble with the Apple Watch
Not really. Masimo's motive here is compensation. They ask for the ban so that Apple will play ball if they prevail, and Apple will either play ball or remove the technology. Most likely they'll negotiate a settlement with Masimo and end users will see no interruptions in availability - at least not due this lawsuit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skeptical.me
I don’t know if they’re right or wrong about the infringement, but they certainly don’t fit the definition of patent trolls. They seem to be actively developping and selling medical technology, not just sitting on vague patents without doing anything with them, which is characteristic of real patent trolls.
Remember the guy that claimed "invented" film screen protectors for mobile devices because he had an obscure patent for protecting the screen of his fish finder, and kept harassing everyone buying (or even making their own for personal use) screen protectors in the forums of all the mobile device enthusiast sites? Larry something or other. He was a hoot.
 
In my opinion they stifle the patent process. if you add up the cost of litigation. How many new companies with what they think is a great device or invention are too afraid to bring it to market. No I stand by my comment. if a company has produced something with its IP then fair enough, but these companies whose only mode is buying up patents, some really old just to litigate...not right in my opinion.
They don't need to "produce" anything but the IP. They can then license it to whomever they wish, at whatever price they can negotiate for it.

You're treading on real shaky ground when championing taking away someone's right to their inventions/implementation of an idea just because they don't have a production line.
 
Apple should be forced to stop selling all products affected, completely removing them from sale until court cases are completely finished.

Apple are getting to big for their own boots.
So....scorched earth policy, where nobody wins. Got it. This is pretty out of touch with reality and totally disconnected from anything that could be good for either company. The ideal for Massimo is that they get fair compensation, if they are indeed in the right, not to curb both benefit to Massimo should the prevail AND the availability, progress, and future invention of technology products that literally millions of people benefit from every day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LD517
This is great news! Why innovate when you can bury a smaller, more innovative and agile company in litigation. Apple, and Google among others, were once innovative companies that built products that enriched our lives. Now, both are shells that push products to exploit and monetize its users. Simply, Google steals confidential information while Apple’s racial, gender, and sexual politics is Cook’s passion. The App Store and iTunes are relics of a once enjoyable experience. Today, both are a chaotic and bloated mess. All companies are destined to fail when they place a higher priority on revenue than innovation and customer service. We are talking about authenticity that waved bye-bye to Apple ten years ago. Cooks idea of innovation is a bigger camera, and more LGBTQ wallpaper & emojis. Huge difference between Jobs and Cook.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: DaveN and I7guy
They just got a patent upheld and you're now trying to claim they may be using Apple patents? Wow...
This is not a reflection on Masimo or anyone else its more a reflection now of how patent rules have become almost untenable. Take a look at some of the patents or even on the Masimo watch...With that amount of patents flying about for the one item, its bound to cause crossover and the same with other manufacturers. Remember too when the Oximeter was invented....way before any of the Masimo patents. Not aiming at Masimo, Apple too where they will drop a tonne of bricks on anyone either breaching their patents or indeed the hint they may be in breach of their patents which is enough to frighten off many newcomers. Patent rules need tightening up, with some patents granted that seem to ignore prior art.
 
Apple needs to be taught a lesson that they can't steal others IP, integrate it into their products and then cry foul and simply weasle their way out of it and pay a miniscule fine.

They need to be hit in pocketbook with a ban and a fine.
They’re not going to get a ban, imo.
 
Didn't know that, here across the pond it is all Siemens/Dräger/Philips. But it still doesn't mean their 'watch' is a medically certified monitoring device. Philips makes patient monitors that are medically certified, but their CPAPs (you know from the foam-gate) aren't allowed for medical diagnostics.
The W1 watch will apparently be FDA certified
 
The W1 watch will apparently be FDA certified
FDA certification? So health insurance companies can use this device to monitor health, hence apple sells them to health insurance companies to give to their clients. That's how it works paid advertising; FDA get millions (apple)to put their FDA certified on it
 
FDA certification? So health insurance companies can use this device to monitor health, hence apple sells them to health insurance companies to give to their clients. That's how it works paid advertising; FDA get millions (apple)to put their FDA certified on it
You think the FDA get paid for paperwork? No.

Firstly, there is no such thing as FDA Certified. There is Approved, Cleared and Authorized. Apple has 3 approvals from the FDA. For the heart rate counter, the aFIB detection and one for rate analysis. The AW is cleared for non-diagnostic patient use.
 
You think the FDA get paid for paperwork? No.

Firstly, there is no such thing as FDA Certified. There is Approved, Cleared and Authorized. Apple has 3 approvals from the FDA. For the heart rate counter, the aFIB detection and one for rate analysis. The AW is cleared for non-diagnostic patient use.
you're funny. you don't recall years ago when apple watch linked itself to FDA and the doctors? If you are not in the sector health profession field you wouldn't know... So Yes they get paid.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.