$500 for stainless is high.
Probably deliberate. It reminds me of initial MacBook air pricing:
- High enough to naturally throttle demand while production ramps up.
- High enough to fund excellent customer support while new-product bugs are worked out (E.g., allow for plenty of "no-questions-asked" replacements for tough customers)
- High enough to repel buyers who just want to bend it on YouTube
It's aimed at early-adopters. The watch for the masses will come in gen. 3 or 4.
Can these watches really get resold as an investment by a later generation? I have buddies who have Rolexes as their daily watch. So lets say they bought it full price in a store for $10,000 15 years ago. Could they really take that relatively run of the mill Rolex and walk into a watch store and sell it back for $10,000? Or would they have to ebay it to get full value (and is there any chance someone spends $10,000 over ebay on something that could be a fake?)
No i don't think in any way the Apple Watch is an investment. But neither is my iPad mini. It is still a nice thing to own.[COLOR="#
I seriously don't understand the purpose of the Apple Watch...and I've owned 6 Macs, 4 Apple TVs, 7 iPhones, 5 iPods and 5 iPads.
I'm not sure if a $4K luxury item will work when it's almost identical to a "cheap and common" steel option. I think people who spend that kind of money on a watch want it to stand out.
The fact that the internals will date very quickly doesn't help either.
And then the battery life.. having a phone in my pocket whose battery is drained is one thing. Having a dead device on my wrist is another. Unless Apple is under-stating the battery life, I can't see myself getting a first-gen.
Looks like Apple is on the right track with the Watch, because a lot of the moaning and whining in this thread reminds me of the first iPhone reaction threads in 2007.
An iPhone 1 NIB is worth thousands of dollars. The value of a Rolex used is, well, do people actually buy used Rolexes? I see a lot for sale in pawn stores and eBay, but do people actually buy them? On eBay, it looks like 95% of the Rolexes don't sell - which to me means there's not really a good secondary market for them, at least at the 4 figure price and up.
Ehhh ... Sticking to my Tag
And WHAT is the difference between the stainless steel 500 bucks and cheapo one for 350 ? JUST the stainless steel ? Only hope to get a year or 2 out of it anyway - so WHY go Stainless ?
Also TAKE MY MONEY - I want one NOW
And WHAT is the difference between the stainless steel 500 bucks and cheapo one for 350 ? JUST the stainless steel ? Only hope to get a year or 2 out of it anyway - so WHY go Stainless ?
Also TAKE MY MONEY - I want one NOW
I have a Tag watch I bought 5-6 years ago for around $2500. If I sold it, I could probably get roughly $1500 for it now as its in near mint condition. An Apple watch with a degenerating battery that will be obsolete within 2 years will lose 95% of its value in 5 years.
And WHAT is the difference between the stainless steel 500 bucks and cheapo one for 350 ? JUST the stainless steel ? Only hope to get a year or 2 out of it anyway - so WHY go Stainless ?
Also TAKE MY MONEY - I want one NOW
Looks like the only other difference is that the stainless model comes with a stainless strap whereas the sport model comes with a plastic strap. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect additional straps to run $95. So that leaves about a $55 gap between the two models for the upgrade of having all stainless look, if that is what one is going for. (Personally I like the aluminum model, and only the alum. model w/ black band).
The gold one is mostly for the vertu type crowd who only want you to be aware that they spent a lot of money on their watch, might as well strap on a wad of cash to your wrist. I'll stick with my Rolex, about 12 years old and just had it appraised for insurance and its doubled in value.