Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Icing on the cake. Coincidentally, that's the exact watch I ordered.

Woke up to an email from UPS saying 'unfortunately' the delivery time had changed - from end of day to 9:45am-1:45pm. Now this. :D:D
 
You know,that's pretty good on apples part. giving is low expectations........ Leaves us impressed.

PS.... Why is the blue sport always the guinea pig? Didn't ifixit use a blue sport too?

This may be the least popular model ordered and in abundant supply. It's also the same model that Apple was offering to expedite shipping to developers.
 
It's great to see the Apple Watch can sustain some limited exposure to water. But stories like this oversimplify water resistance and may send the wrong message to users. This will encourage folks to perform activities with their watch that may eventually result in water resistance failure.

The Apple Watch is designed to withstand light and infrequent exposure to water. Every time you expose it to the conditions warned against in the user guide (including swimming), you may be weakening its water resistance and increasing the chance that it will leak and fail in the future.
 
Last edited:
PS.... Why is the blue sport always the guinea pig? Didn't ifixit use a blue sport too?

I believe they originally wanted to use the neon lime green sport but people were having seizures and projectile vomiting from the sight of the band.

Blue was safer and more humane for all.
 
IPX7: Ingress of water in harmful quantity shall not be possible when the enclosure is immersed in water under defined conditions of pressure and time (up to 1 m of submersion). Test duration: 30 minutes
The lowest point of enclosures with a height less than 850 mm is located 1000 mm below the surface of the water, the highest point of enclosures with a height equal to or greater than 850 mm is located 150 mm below the surface of the water

From the Apple Watch User Guide:

“Water resistance is not a permanent condition and Apple Watch cannot be rechecked or resealed for water resistance.”

“Submerging Apple Watch is not recommended.”


“Try to minimize exposing Apple Watch to these substances and follow the instructions below in the “Cleaning and care” section if Apple Watch comes into contact with them: Soap, detergent, acids or acidic foods, and any liquids other than fresh water, such as salt water, soapy water, pool water, perfume, insect repellent, lotions, sunscreen, oil, adhesive remover, hair dye, or solvents.”

“The following may affect the water resistance of Apple Watch and should be avoided: Dropping Apple Watch or subjecting it to other impacts. Submerging Apple Watch in water for long periods of time. Swimming or bathing with Apple Watch. Exposing Apple Watch to pressurized water or high velocity water, for example, showering, water skiing, wake boarding, surfing, jet skiing, and so on. Wearing Apple Watch in the sauna or steam room.”

Every time you expose your Apple Watch to the conditions listed above, you may be weakening its water resistance and increasing the chance that it will leak and fail in the future. Even watches that are explicitly designed for swimming and diving must be periodically inspected and seals checked and/or replaced. This is not possible with an Apple Watch.
 
This is good to hear. I was concerned about this as I have to wait another month before recieving my watch. I totally expect the pent up tear of joy to be significant. This article could increase my joy and tears and I will not worry.

:D
 
How is this 'better than expected' or an example of 'underpromise, overdeliver'? The IPX7 rating is good for submersion to at least 1m for at least 30 minutes. Sticking it in a bucket for 5 minutes isn't exactly strenuous.
 
I bet a future version will be waterproof. I'll wait for that one.

I would love for this to be true, but the more I've researched this the less optimistic I am. Making the Apple Watch more water resistant (there's no such thing as water proof) would require adding o-ring type seals and gaskets at every seam, which in turn would require the case of the Watch to be thicker. This would be particularly challenging with the digital crown and the speaker and microphone. I think Apple is highly unlikely to do this in the foreseeable future.
 
The second someone tries this, and presses a button, they will ruin their Watch, and swear they did nothing different than this test. #watergate
 
I involuntarily swam with an iPhone 3GS in my pocket for a few minutes in the middle of a lake after my boat flipped over a few years ago. Got out of the water, panicked about how my iPhone was almost certainly a goner, then discovered it worked fine.

Still, it's not something I recommend figuring out for yoruself.
 
Not bad at all, but I always find it weird when people take showers with jewelry on.
 
Not much of a test.

Pretty much any modern electronic device will survive these tests. The real test is after a few weeks, will it not have corroded and start failing.
 
I think I'm going to get the square trade warranty for my sport watch. $10 more than the Apple Care+, but coverage is a little more than Apple Care. AND it does cover immersion. :)
 
I don't care if it is more water resistant than expected. I'm still not doing it.

For one thing, I can't stand the feeling of water underneath rings, bracelets, etc. Ugh.

It would be cool to use while swimming, but I won't be doing it until a newer revision with a higher waterproof rating. The shower though, I don't understand. Getting soap/shampoo/water in the crevices of the watch just seems gross.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.