Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch Series 2 is Slightly Thicker and Heavier Due to Larger Battery
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Why do I need a faster Watch? Or better graphics? I argue that no one does and this is reflective of Apple still wanting the watch to be a little phone but marketing it as what they know 95% of people use it for - fitness. They have the data showing no one is using apps outside of basic notifications and Siri.
I know they need the battery life for GPS but I wish it was thinner - much thinner.
Waterproof - great! GPS - super great! Faster? Don't care. How about the screen works when I am sweating. That would be nice.
And yes, despite thinking the watch was pointless even while owning one, I have started using it for fitness it works really well. Will buy the new one for the GPS. No one knows how to measure anything else useful yet with sensors so I think the watch has no where to go for a long time.
I know they need the battery life for GPS but I wish it was thinner - much thinner.
Waterproof - great! GPS - super great! Faster? Don't care. How about the screen works when I am sweating. That would be nice.
And yes, despite thinking the watch was pointless even while owning one, I have started using it for fitness it works really well. Will buy the new one for the GPS. No one knows how to measure anything else useful yet with sensors so I think the watch has no where to go for a long time.
Last edited:
Were did you read that value? On apple.com I found 18 hours battery life but they say nothing about GPS
They have data showing no one is using apps because they're too slow so they've addressed this in the upcoming wOS 3 with the all-new Dock.
They also didn't say that all Apple Watch Series 2 now have a ceramic back. That adds weight.
As a side note, that composite back really screwed up my watch and charger. The back got so scratched to the point that its texture is now rough, and the charger has black spots all over it. And this was only caused by taking it on and off the charger normally! But when I tried to get it replaced twice, they rejected it both times.
As a side note, that composite back really screwed up my watch and charger. The back got so scratched to the point that its texture is now rough, and the charger has black spots all over it. And this was only caused by taking it on and off the charger normally! But when I tried to get it replaced twice, they rejected it both times.
Nylon bands are still $49 US, same as the sport bands. When ordered separately.
Bundled, however, they are only available with Series 2, which costs more than Series 1.
(I'm pretty happy that Series 1 is better than the original launch watch, yet costs $100 less for 42mm, $80 less for 38mm. The screen sizes are only $30 apart now. And the new brighter Series 2 for outdoor workouts costs the same as the original launch for 42mm, or $20 increased for 38mm.)
The best deal around is the Series 1 plus any $49 band you like. You get the new speed plus TWO bands to swap, including the new colors, all for $51 less than the original was at launch--or the same price as the original was last week with ONE band.
The irony is high, but not everyone's irony-radar will be switched on.
Now now... don't get everyone all worked up. You KNOW not everyone will catch that.
One of the biggest complaints about the first gen was how slow it was though. It obviously needed more power and more power requires a bigger battery. I think everyone would have liked to see it get a bit thinner but maybe this is a trade off that just had to be made to make the watch more functional.
In the UK, nylon and sports bands are now £49.000. My black nylon band cost me £39.00 back in May.
I was hoping for an in-store upgrade if form factor has not changed... I don't buy watches every year and am not about to start now. Keeping the form factor, yet the option to swap out guts, get a credit on the guts etc. would be great. I don't need a new case and watch bands, i DO need better performance and greater independence from the iPhone. Guess I'll be waiting several more years before making any $$ decisions in this regard.
I started with a SG Sport at launch last year and upgraded to a SB Stainless when they released it with the sport band.
That being said, I'll be picking up a Ceramic Edition when they're available. I'll still keep my SB Stainless because I love the look, but that white is too sexy.
That being said, I'll be picking up a Ceramic Edition when they're available. I'll still keep my SB Stainless because I love the look, but that white is too sexy.
I couldn't care less about it having its own GPS. I always have my phone with me, so its unnecessary. I think they should have put the GPS in the new Nike version, and made the new series 2 thinner with better battery life. Outside of their favorite customers, runners, who needs separate GPS?
I'm not a hiker, but... if you're going on a 5+ hour hike, wouldn't you at least take your phone with you? In that case, the GPS capabilities of the AW would not be in use, in favor of the phone. Or am I missing something?
That additional thickness is minuscule. Since it makes room for additional components and a bigger battery, I think it's the best thing they could have done. They could also stop the deceptive marketing regarding the thickness of the watch. To be fair, it's most of us who are making the mistake. Apple's marketing only displays case measurements:
We are the one's incorrectly assuming these are the measurements for the actual watch which includes the sensors. It's what they want to assume, so who's to blame? Why not just give the true dimensions of the watch and be done with it? They give true dimensions to accessory makers. Are consumers not worthy of the truth?
We are the one's incorrectly assuming these are the measurements for the actual watch which includes the sensors. It's what they want to assume, so who's to blame? Why not just give the true dimensions of the watch and be done with it? They give true dimensions to accessory makers. Are consumers not worthy of the truth?
There are a lot of runners with this watch, me included. If you don't want GPS, get the series 1 option.
The screen is 2 x brighter and it has a GPS / barometer running, that is great they made it last similar battery time. 1mm wont matter.
When I ever buy an iPhone, I'll consider buying an 
Watch. For now, I am staying with NOTHING on my wrists. I do have a Timex Triathlon (c.1999) that I can wear when I am going somewhere that I need a watch and don't want to use my phone.
Watch. For now, I am staying with NOTHING on my wrists. I do have a Timex Triathlon (c.1999) that I can wear when I am going somewhere that I need a watch and don't want to use my phone.Maybe they’re changing their mind on their thinness obsession. Fixed your typo.
