and until you actually own one, it only seems coolWhile I think an apple watch with LTE is "cool." As with most, the amount of times I'm without my phone is next to 0, so it really doesn't even have the convenience factor.
Not new technology per se but, new with this particular Apple product.
Many of the same people complaining about the $10.00 are the same people that spend $150+ on Apple Watch bands and $100+ a month at Starbucks etc. I am not knocking the behaviour but gently reminding some that like everything else, it all comes down to willingness to pay for what is deemed important. And that is ok.
Real world answer: People who run long distances and don't want to carry their (increasingly larger) smartphones with them, but must have a method of communication with them for safety reasons.
For example, I run multiple marathons a year and am training year round. I go on long runs all the time. I also live in the middle of a very large non-pedestrian-focused city with a lot of drivers who are generally oblivious to pedestrians, and have had several close calls over the years. Additionally, I'm an asthmatic and while problems are rare–there's always the threat of something bad happening. I have to have a way to call in case of an emergency. For people like me having a watch that can do emergency calls (or allow you to receive messages while you're on a 3+ hour run just in case someone else is having an emergency worth cutting your run short for) without having to carry a large device with you is very appealing.
Edit: Clearly this isn't a need that isn't covered by a phone. It is, however, a substantial quality of life improvement for some.
There are a lot of cell companies offering service. The problem is some people don't feel comfortable being part of an off brand carrier, or risking giving up good coverage even if it is more expensive than they want. The other part of the equation is the entitlement mentality that is ravaging our society. We have seen numerous examples of said mindset here.This is one of the unfortunate circumstances of being limited to a just a few service providers. Reminds me a lot of the telecomm business for local markets (I'm looking at you Comcast). You essentially get 2 (3+ if you're lucky) providers to choose from, and then you're completely at their mercy on costs. I would love to see 10 competitors with similar networks of coverage and speed.
How does T-Mobile including fees make any real difference? You are still paying the fees and on top of that, you don't see the specifics of the breakdown. I may be different but, I prefer to see how my bill breaks down to make sure something isn't amiss.Thank goodness for TMobile including fees. I'm still a bit undecided after 3 months how I feel about the untethered data. I barely use it, and when I do use it, it's so minimal that I really need to rethink the justification for it. I thought when it first came out that I would be using it more, but I find myself surprisingly not. When Apple finally gets a Podcast app for the watch it may make a difference, but for now, I still remain tethered for most of the time.
And then when you see that local price > US$ price x exchange rate and complaint that “Apple charges too much in my country” ...Sorry, but LOL @ the USA.
Not only do you have to suffer 12 month warranties without any cost saving, but you also have to pay $15 a month for Watch service?
Australia: 3 year warranty on Macs, at least 2 years on everything else Apple, without paying a cent more. And Watch service costs $5 Australian dollars at all 3 carriers, with no extra fees, taxes or charges. I also get an extra SIM card for my iPads that share my data plan for free!
I think you guys need stronger consumer laws with teeth, and an enforcement agency not afraid to use them.
If they are capping the total price at $10 then they are charging a lower base fee. For instance, if they are charging $10 in Chicago they are absorbing $8.50 that AT&T passes on to us and effectively charging only $1.50.How does T-Mobile including fees make any real difference? You are still paying the fees and on top of that, you don't see the specifics of the breakdown. I may be different but, I prefer to see how my bill breaks down to make sure something isn't amiss.
Why does a wristwatch even need LTE???
Because you gonna want to take a phone call while surfing in Malibu!!!! Jeeez you’ve never wanted to do that?Why does a wristwatch even need LTE???
Sorry, but LOL @ the USA.
Not only do you have to suffer 12 month warranties without any cost saving, but you also have to pay $15 a month for Watch service?
Australia: 3 year warranty on Macs, at least 2 years on everything else Apple, without paying a cent more. And Watch service costs $5 Australian dollars at all 3 carriers, with no extra fees, taxes or charges. I also get an extra SIM card for my iPads that share my data plan for free!
I think you guys need stronger consumer laws with teeth, and an enforcement agency not afraid to use them.
I haven't seen anyone in the thread suggest we should blindly trust.But sure, let's just trust these carriers to do the right thing for consumers when Trump gets done axing all the regulations, because of course they will do the right thing, they always have, right?
I too train year round, often on long single track runs. And run multiple marathons and ultramarathons. I don't carry my phone when running, never have even when on long runs in the bush or in the town. **** happens and touchwood, I've never been in the position where I've needed to communicate in an emergency.
While some people feel the need for 24/7 contact or emergency contact, I never have. I began running many years before the advent of a cellphone that you could carry and hope to continue for a few more yet.
I just can't see the point investing in yet another insurance policy in the form of a cellular account on a watch. I bought an AW3 without cellular for that reason. It just seemed absolutely pointless.
I do carry my phone when cycling, but only because it's easy to slip into the back of the shirt.
Life is risky.
Its a shame Apple seems more and more profit driven as time goes on.
Ahhhhm, they're publicly held..Profit and ultimately shareholder wealth is the name of the game. They're not a charity organization.Its a shame Apple seems more and more profit driven as time goes on.