Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,162
38,937



While the focus and discussion following today's Apple event remains largely on the iPhone X, the company also announced the Apple Watch Series 3, which packs cellular connectivity into the same form factor of Apple's wearable device that we've seen since the first generation.

First impressions for the device have now been released, and The Verge pointed out that the Apple Watch Series 3 will be very familiar to any previous Apple Watch wearers, explaining that you can only really notice its slightly thicker case when comparing the Series 3 to the Series 2 from each side. The only other differentiating factor is the red dot on the Digital Crown of the LTE models.

apple_watch_3_screen-800x533.jpg


Apple claimed that the LTE Apple Watch Series 3 will last as long as previous versions of the smartwatch (about 18 hours, though most users get more out of it), but The Verge remained skeptical about that statistic ahead of an official test and review. For now, the site said the updated Apple Watch still doesn't feel like a game-changer, but those on older generations will likely find a lot of reasons to upgrade.
And the even bigger question: will having a smartwatch with LTE really change things? Apple is not the first to make an LTE-equipped smartwatch; Samsung and LG have done it before. It will certainly be useful for very specific things -- not having to carry a phone on a long hike and still having LTE for emergency situations, or streaming new music from the watch when you're out and about and are tired of your locally stored stuff. And hey: Apple even showed a woman surfing while wearing a cellular-equipped Apple Watch.

But I'm also not convinced yet that this is a total game-changer -- not yet. It's still in a relationship with iPhone. It just happens to be a more powerful, capable, more independent gadget when iPhone is not around.
Engadget noted that while the design of the Apple Watch Series 3 isn't "much to write home about" when looking for differences between it and earlier models, Apple's decision to retain support for older bands is still a welcome move. After trying it on, Engadget said the Series 3 version felt essentially the same to the Apple Watch Series 2, but the site explained that this is "a huge testament to [Apple] Watch's design team.

mg-2820-1-800x534.jpg

That the Apple Watch Series 3 doesn't feel different from the Series 2 I wear almost everyday is a huge testament to Watch's design team. Apple says the actually difference in depth amounts to two sheets of paper, and, while I didn't have any spare sheets to test against, most people will never notice the difference. That's saying something considering just what's inside: there's an LTE radio and an embedded SIM, and the screen itself acts as an antenna. Unfortunately, none of the Apple Watches I tested were actually provisioned on a cellular network, so no test calls went through.
Engadget also pointed out a "pretty noticeable" increase in performance compared to Series 2, although it isn't as "pronounced" as the jump from the first generation to Series 2. Of course, some of the more notable changes to Series 3 -- like hearing Siri speak or streaming Apple Music -- will have to wait for official reviews once the device launches on September 22.

mg-2863-1-800x534.jpg
There's a pretty noticeable step up in performance too, thanks to the S3 chipset ticking away inside. The change doesn't seem quite as pronounced as the leap from the Series 1 to the Series 2, but I didn't notice any lag or stuttering on Apple's pre-release units.

All told, the Series 3 packs some handy upgrades and should serve as the starting point for people new to the Apple Watch. I'm curious to see how many people will actually embrace the wireless version, which costs $70 extra than the non-LTE model. Apple's vision of wearables is one where people don't have to worry about carrying their phones with them 24/7, but honestly, I think a lot of people like things the way they are.
The Apple Watch Series 3 is available in a Wi-Fi only model starting at $329, and a Wi-Fi + Cellular model starting at $399. Apple today also unveiled new bands and cases for the device, including a new Sport Loop and new Gray Ceramic case.

Article Link: Apple Watch Series 3: Skepticism Surrounds Usefulness of LTE, but Performance Improvements Welcome
 
If they stopped selling this as a stand alone device rather than an iPhone accessory I could see this feature being more beneficial. Making setup and app installs all done on the watch could open a whole new market of people wanting a decent smart watch and fitness tracker but don’t have android.
 
I get that they're busy perfecting this device, however I think the lack of a design change (since 2014!) will be the detrimental factor to barely anyone being interested in this device. The software from this and the TV still appear to not be completely intuitive, at least not to the Apple standard.

I have no doubt that the role of these devices will be pivotal within the next five years, the future is bright, but for today the mass general public will not really care about this version.

Ps - can't wait till these micro-technologies trickle down to future iPhones, just like how iOS device tech trickled back to the Mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
The thing preventing me from having much interest in Series 3 is the required LTE line.

If I'm using the same number, why do I need a new "smartwatch line"? Why can't I just pull data from my iPhone's stash?

There are times that I would like to go out without my phone- watch only. But they aren't super frequent, so I will just be paying for that LTE line even if my watch is pulling data from my iPhone in range.

Will sadly have to pass for now.
 
I’ll certainly be getting one when I can order it. Been wanting an :apple:watch for a while and this will help. Won’t need my phone when going on a run straight off the bat. $10 a month is not a big deal. Already pay heaps for the phones et al so this is cents...

Pity this site has gone through and made it so that I was not surprised by anything. Just nodding and saying “Yep, I knew that.” but, at least I watched it and got to abuse Philastine Schnillerhead.
 
I would rather they focussed on making it 50% thinner instead of changing the connectivity
I like the watch but I find myself taking it off more and more when I m at home because its bulky
 
The only thing that is really needed to setup is signing into iCloud account. Scribble and voice could work just fine and once it’s signed into your account all your WiFi passwords could sync.
you need to scribble in the email AND password. it took me two minutes to type a full sentence in the messages app using scribble. wonder how you're going to scribble in a lowercase o and capital O in the password.
 
I disagree. This was the sleeper today. Music with my AirPods and no phone. Epic
Exactly! This is going to be my first Iwatch purchase!
I'm going to be able to make calls on my watch without my iPhone?!!
Anyone remember STAR Trek? Beam me up Scottie!!
People are complaining about paying .33 a day extra to do this?
I dont know what the reviewers are smoking but it this doesn't become apples
best selling watch so far I don't know what will put it over the top!
 
The upgrade to a GPS only series 3 is not impressive. I have a series 0 and probably will upgrade to a series 2 after this rollout. Remember BB had the older model series0 for up to $300 off list and I expect to see something similar now for older series2. Looks like next year for that complete redesign.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mguzzi
still no round-dial?? Apple Watch 0, i'm keeping you for now.

sorry, I'm not paying 120 dollars per year for LTE, and from the time I have my Apple watch, I've recieved 0 calls from my watch, it's just dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
I would rather they focussed on making it 50% thinner instead of changing the connectivity
I like the watch but I find myself taking it off more and more when I m at home because its bulky

Yes...I would’ve liked a thinner, non-LTE version as a option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.