Apple watch is a great idea in theory. Why in he world would you want a watch you have to charge and its battery life is not that great? Its basically a redesigned digital watch. Plus it is only fully useful if connected to an iPhone etc as it does very little on its own. Prefer my Swiss Made Tissot T-Race Automatic with stainless steel, carbon fibre and sapphire crystal display - no battery required - no electronics - fully mechanical, and even has a see-through back to see the mechanics working. Costs around $2,000 but better value than the Apple Watch and its a true watch.
Same comment as everyone else who won't be buying one...
- Complaint about battery time ... Check
- Saying it doesn't transcend current technology, or the competition... Check
(same complaint as Ipod, Ipad and Iphone pre-launch)
- Falsehood about what it can do without the phone .... Check
- It's not super duper like a mechanical watch... Duh, it's a computer
- It's not a good value... Despite 80% markup on their own watch... Check
Well, that's fine, the actual demo for the watch is not you.
As for your points.
- Purported to last as long as the original Iphone under load... That must mean the Iphone failed...
- Many people, including myself don't give a crap about mechanical watches, they could all die and I wouldn't bat an eyelash.
- The phone has many independent functions, check Apple'S web site or wait and listen to the webcast monday (and will have even more once native apps come to it by the end of year).
- Your out to lunch about your watches "value" to the general public; it has a significant value to a quite narrow clique of people. Everyone else probably thinks you got ripped off.
----------
Right, "news" from 6 months ago. There are probably 1000 web sites with positives after the launch and more recent news.. Including Apple's web site which you seem to have avoided. Check them out.