Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple Watch Ultra 2 Already Facing 6-7 Week Shipping Delay for Some Configurations

If apple reallly wanted to be sustainable “” why don’t they just sell the watch by itself with out another over priced apple band? Also there is no difference between the original ultra and the new ultra besides the tap to answer which in my humble opinion should be available in all the older watches. I think the idea bin over at the park has run dry or all their employees can’t afford to live nearby as such they spend their energy on commute, paying super high rent and the stress of living in the Bay Area.
 
ProfessionalFan said:
The people looking to disparage a product always have a response ready.

If it sells out fast, it is because they only made 5 units.

If it remains available, it is because it is a flop and nobody wants it.
Click to expand...
At least one person is a fan of the Mother Nature skit. lolz.
 
ProfessionalFan said:
Bandless should be an option, but the problem is that people would then want the price reduced which wouldn't happen.

The band Apple included with each watch costs them very little to manufacture, but we can all see the price of each one when you buy it standalone. Including the band let Apple pad the starting price of the watch a bit and they won't be changing that strategy I am sure.

I'd like to see them add the Ultra to the Apple Watch Studio though. I understand those bands are 45mm and not 49mm but as someone who has used a 45mm band on the Ultra, it is good enough. I'd love to be able to purchase a new Ultra with any 45mm band available such as a braided loop and not just the select few 49mm bands.
Click to expand...
I'm more being snide about the environmental comments they made throughout the presentation. I've bought two Apple watches new, and 2 used, and never used the bands. The easiest way to save the environment, if this is Apples true goal and not just one being used as a marketing term, is to never produce the item in the first place.

And there should be a price reduction, or an Apple electronic gift card, for this option.
 
Not surprised. It’s the most compelling watch now. I absolutely love mine. No reason to upgrade to Ultra 2, but for anyone who didn’t get an Ultra last year, the Ultra 2 is a fantastic upgrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
ProfessionalFan said:
Well it's only a weak update for someone who had the Ultra 1. That's not who was targeted and it is likely not the main source of buyers thus far.
Click to expand...
id just thinking anyone who would drop $800 on a watch woulda went for it last year. The only thing that will peak my interest with this thing is when they add a micro LED display....which I've been waiting for since the second Apple Watch lol
 
I am very happy. I ordered 11 hours after launch and am still getting it on Launch Day. Could have been a lot worse!

It would have been a bummer to wait an extra 1.5 to 2 months as that is a significant chunk of the lifespan if you were to upgrade sooner than later.

I tend to keep Apple Watches for 2 full years. This might be the first one that I keep longer though, potentially 3 years of more if I “replace” the battery.
 
Rychiar said:
id just thinking anyone who would drop $800 on a watch woulda went for it last year.
Click to expand...
Well I'm someone who bought the Series 8 last year but ordered the Ultra 2 this year so there's one person. I'm guessing I am not the only one!
 
GuruZac said:
Not surprised. It’s the most compelling watch now. I absolutely love mine. No reason to upgrade to Ultra 2, but for anyone who didn’t get an Ultra last year, the Ultra 2 is a fantastic upgrade.
Click to expand...
As a first gen. AWU adopter I’m looking forward to the AWU2. The 3,000 nits is a very welcome addition for outdoor enthusiasts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpaterson69
Makes sense. Plenty of people wanted the Ultra, but didn't want a first gen product. So they wait for Gen 2 and get a great watch (Though without much benefit over the Gen 1...at least not yet, probably once Apple kills off support for S5-S8 all with the same processor generation...)
 
Hmmmmm…9/22 delivery date.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0871.jpeg
    IMG_0871.jpeg
    777.5 KB · Views: 113
  • Love
Reactions: AppleDumplings
jclardy said:
Makes sense. Plenty of people wanted the Ultra, but didn't want a first gen product. So they wait for Gen 2 and get a great watch (Though without much benefit over the Gen 1...at least not yet, probably once Apple kills off support for S5-S8 all with the same processor generation...)
Click to expand...

Watch Ultra 2 is very tempting. But... I'm holding out until Ultra sports a USB-C port. And comes with a TB4 cable in the box. :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Eldaerenth Faexidor
LarryJoe33 said:
Yawn, this isn't much of an upgrade over the original ultra. Delays for bands, SMH.
Click to expand...
Since I have the last years Ultra, I am happy about this. I was hoping the update wouldn't tempt me in the least and it hasn't.

I am curious about what they will do next year. All the rumors point to big 10 year change to the regular watch and I am hoping they don't do the same with the AWU.

I could be wrong but I don't see them changing the AWU housing after only 2 years.

There are rumors of a new magnetic band attachment mechanism that will create more room internally for a bigger battery. I don't think this would be a good idea for a rugged outdoor watch like the Ultra. Too many scenarios where a magnetic attachment can get pulled off. That is, unless its has a locking feature with a pin that locks it into place but takes up way less room.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LarryJoe33 and IIGS User
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back