Garmin Fenix (probably the most popular running watch for ultrarunners) weighs 70-96G depending on model.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch Ultra Priced at $799, Available to Order Today Ahead of September 23 Launch
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Apple website says that the new bands are backwards compatible so I’m sure the old bands probably work.
Something is wrong here. Even with VAT and the current exchange rate the difference in price is shocking. I wonder if the US price announcement was a mistake…
The Fenix comes in a few different variations but the 7 Sapphire Solar I have is 50 grams. Not sure if Apple is including the Watch band in its calculation but I’d guess it isn’t.
On Tuesday I was about to pull the trigger on the Garmin Epix 2 AMOLED display that has 416x416 resolution and 5 day battery life with all functions always on display for $1000. So glad I waited, the AW Ultra isn't everything I wanted, but for $200 less and Apple's integration, I was happy with it.
Let's be real, no actual scuba diver, nor explorer for that matter, will be relying on this Apple watch. They'd stick to professional and well established gear.
It's just for wannabes or those going on a little walk somewhere. Not serious exploration.
So the screen is basically the same size? That’s a let down.
Is it just me or do those bands actually look less reliable than the standard sports strap? Especially the climbing one.
The diving one looks interesting. As a non-diver I'm wondering if it's as crazy as it sounds to trust your life to an Apple Watch app to use as your diving computer. Also interesting that salt water doesn't seem to be any issue.
The diving one looks interesting. As a non-diver I'm wondering if it's as crazy as it sounds to trust your life to an Apple Watch app to use as your diving computer. Also interesting that salt water doesn't seem to be any issue.
Ya but your comparing a multi use watch built within a eco system in mind to a specialized brand of watches that cater to 1 group.
Thought it was going to be at least $999. So was very surprised with the price!!
The point remains. Apple’s ads focused heavily on hiking and what looks like extended stays outside the grid. The battery life is far from what people are used to expecting from rugged gear. It’s definitely more a convenience device than a survival tool. Nice to have, but it can’t be the only device that performs an essential function.
The weight of each device depends on the material used in manufacturing. For example, the Apple Watch Series 7 weights 32g for the aluminum option, 42.3g for stainless steel, and 37g for titanium.
The Apple Watch Series 8 weight 38.8g for aluminum and 51.5g for stainless steel. Of course, given its larger size, the Apple Watch Ultra weighs more at 61.3g for the titanium-only option.
Ok , that’s me out sadly, the ss 6 weighs a ton already , 61.3 g ! Forget it .
The Apple Watch Series 8 weight 38.8g for aluminum and 51.5g for stainless steel. Of course, given its larger size, the Apple Watch Ultra weighs more at 61.3g for the titanium-only option.
Ok , that’s me out sadly, the ss 6 weighs a ton already , 61.3 g ! Forget it .
The larger ones yes (42,44,45mm bands)
You also can use the new Ultra bands on the 42,44,45mm watches.