Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,484
37,750


On September 9, 2014, towards the end of Apple's iPhone 6 press event, CEO Tim Cook announced "one more thing," and after a brief video, appeared on stage wearing the first Apple Watch. The date of the original device's unveiling has led some to wonder whether Apple's upcoming iPhone 16 event on Monday, September 9 could see a special tenth anniversary version of the Apple Watch debut.

Apple-Watch-X-Feature.jpg

The first chatter about a possible "Apple Watch X" appeared back in January 2023, when a French report claimed that Apple planned to skip the Apple Watch Series 9, much like the company did when it launched the iPhone X instead of an iPhone 9 model in 2017. Pronounced "ten," the "X" branding referred to the iPhone's 10th anniversary.

That didn't happen. Indeed, if "Apple Watch X" had launched in 2023, only nine years would have elapsed since Cook unveiled the original model, which is why the rumor was branded "sketchy." For the "X" branding to logically make sense, Apple would have to announce it in 2024 – on Monday, September 9, to be exact, which happens to be the date of Apple's iPhone 16 event.

However, there's still uncertainty about whether Apple will unveil a special edition "Apple Watch X" or a more standard issue Apple Watch Series 10 at next month's event. One reason is that after the original Apple Watch presentation in September 2014, it actually took seven months before customers got their hands on the smartwatch, with the device's official release occurring on April 24, 2015.

Tim Cook unveils the original Apple Watch in Sept 2014

Another reason is that the device Apple is rumored to be preparing appears, on paper, to be a rather modest upgrade on its predecessor. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple is planning to debut a thinner version of the Apple Watch this year, but he has said it is "unlikely" that it will look much different than the current models. In August 2023, when Gurman first mentioned a thinner tenth anniversary model, he said that Apple was considering a magnetic band attachment system that would free up space in the Apple Watch. However, his most recent reports have not mentioned this functionality.

Apple has also been working on hypertension and sleep apnea detection for this year's model, but Gurman says these features may not be ready to launch. Apple is reportedly having issues with reliability for the hypertension feature, which could lead to delays, and the sleep apnea detection relies on blood oxygen monitoring that Apple has had to temporarily remove from the Apple Watch due to patent issues.
Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has also suggested that the 2024 Apple Watch will have a thinner body with larger screen sizes. Kuo expects this year's model to be available in 45mm and 49mm sizes, up from the current 41mm and 45mm size options. However, Kuo made no mention of the possibility that this could be a tenth anniversary edition.

apple-watch-x-91mobiles.jpg
Alleged next-generation Apple Watch CAD render

CAD renders of what might be the next-generation Apple Watch surfaced in June, allegedly depicting a larger model with a two inch display, which is a bit bigger than the 1.93-inch Apple Watch Ultra. The dimensions are said to measure roughly 46 x 39.7 x 11.6mm, so that would be a bit larger than the Series 9 but smaller than the Apple Watch Ultra. The design seems to have the same Digital Crown and Side Button, and it is overall similar to the Apple Watch Series 9. But there is no evidence of a notably slimmed down case or a magnetic band attachment system.
In summary, with the Apple Watch Series 9 available now, an Apple Watch Series 10 or "X" would be more appropriate for 2024, not 2025, but the X naming is just speculation at this point, and Apple may not feel that the device justifies the branding. Alongside the iPhone 16 and new AirPods, Apple plans to introduce the next-generation Apple Watch at its September 9 event, dubbed "It's Glowtime," with a launch likely to follow on September 20. Are you expecting an era-defining Apple Watch X? Let us know in the comments.

Article Link: Apple Watch X? September 9 Event Date Marks 10th Anniversary
 
Last edited:
One way or the other, it's the Apple Watch 10 (or X), just like the iPhone X was called the 10.

While we all like something new, shiny and different, there is only so much Apple could really do to change the watch given the form factor. Similarly, Apple receives criticism for changing things just for the sake of change all of the time (butterfly keyboard, iOS 18 Photos app, etc.), so I don't know this is the strategy we want for the Apple Watch 10.
 
One way or the other, it's the Apple Watch 10 (or X), just like the iPhone X was called the 10.

While we all like something new, shiny and different, there is only so much Apple could really do to change the watch given the form factor. Similarly, Apple receives criticism for changing things just for the sake of change all of the time (butterfly keyboard, iOS 18 Photos app, etc.), so I don't know this is the strategy we want for the Apple Watch 10.
To be fair, the two examples you gave are a decade apart. Apple could easily try something new, but they won't because there is no need to. They make enough off the watches, and more importantly the rest of the market still hasn't caught up, so why push for something people won't want?
 
  • Like
Reactions: noblesoul117


On September 9, 2014, towards the end of Apple's iPhone 6 press event, CEO Tim Cook announced "one more thing," and after a brief video, appeared on stage wearing the first Apple Watch. The date of the original device's unveiling has led some to wonder whether Apple's upcoming iPhone 16 event on Monday, September 9 could see a special tenth anniversary version of the Apple Watch debut.

Apple-Watch-X-Feature.jpg

The first chatter about a possible "Apple Watch X" appeared back in January 2023, when a French report claimed that Apple planned to skip the Apple Watch Series 9, much like the company did when it launched the iPhone X instead of an iPhone 9 model in 2017. Pronounced "ten," the "X" branding referred to the iPhone's 10th anniversary.

That didn't happen. Indeed, if "Apple Watch X" had launched in 2023, only nine years would have elapsed since Cook unveiled the original model, which is why the rumor was branded "sketchy." For the "X" branding to logically make sense, Apple would have to announce it in 2024 – on Monday, September 9, to be exact, which happens to be the date of Apple's iPhone 16 event.

However, there's still uncertainty about whether Apple will unveil a special edition "Apple Watch X" or a more standard issue Apple Watch Series 10 at next month's event. One reason is that after the original Apple Watch presentation in September 2014, it actually took seven months before customers got their hands on the smartwatch, with the device's official release occurring on April 24, 2015.

Tim Cook unveils the original Apple Watch in Sept 2014

Another reason is that the device Apple is rumored to be preparing appears, on paper, to be a rather modest upgrade on its predecessor. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple is planning to debut a thinner version of the Apple Watch this year, but he has said it is "unlikely" that it will look much different than the current models. In August 2023, when Gurman first mentioned a thinner tenth anniversary model, he said that Apple was considering a magnetic band attachment system that would free up space in the Apple Watch. However, his most recent reports have not mentioned this functionality.

Apple has also been working on hypertension and sleep apnea detection for this year's model, but Gurman says these features may not be ready to launch. Apple is reportedly having issues with reliability for the hypertension feature, which could lead to delays, and the sleep apnea detection relies on blood oxygen monitoring that Apple has had to temporarily remove from the Apple Watch due to patent issues.

Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has also suggested that the 2024 Apple Watch will have a thinner body with larger screen sizes. Kuo expects this year's model to be available in 45mm and 49mm sizes, up from the current 41mm and 45mm size options. However, Kuo made no mention of the possibility that this could be a tenth anniversary edition.

apple-watch-x-91mobiles.jpg

Alleged next-generation Apple Watch CAD render

CAD renders of what might be the next-generation Apple Watch surfaced in June, allegedly depicting a larger model with a two inch display, which is a bit bigger than the 1.93-inch Apple Watch Ultra. The dimensions are said to measure roughly 46 x 39.7 x 11.6mm, so that would be a bit larger than the Series 9 but smaller than the Apple Watch Ultra. The design seems to have the same Digital Crown and Side Button, and it is overall similar to the Apple Watch Series 9. But there is no evidence of a notably slimmed down case or a magnetic band attachment system.
In summary, with the Apple Watch Series 9 available now, an Apple Watch Series 10 or "X" would be more appropriate for 2024, not 2025, but the X naming is just speculation at this point, and Apple may not feel as if the device justifies the branding. Alongside the iPhone 16 and new AirPods, Apple plans to introduce the next-generation Apple Watch at its September 9 event, dubbed "It's Glowtime," with a launch likely to follow on September 20. Are you expecting an Apple Watch X? Let us know in the comments.

Article Link: Apple Watch X? September 9 Event Date Marks Its 10th Anniversary
Given that the iPhone 16 seems pretty underwhelming, I hope that they have a surprise up their sleeve.

An “Apple Watch X” could be cool and help make the event exciting.

At this point I’m just rooting for any new industrial design, for any of their products. I know they spent a lot of time and money on the Vision Pro but us regular folks want excitement too!

There is no sense of adventure or fun with Apple industrial design anymore. Why does it take 4-6 years for new designs to be introduced?

Maybe hit up ol’ Jonny Ive again. He doesn’t need Apple, but Apple needs him.
 
I am not an Apple Watch owner. I never saw the reason to buy one, being that I only use a wristwatch to tell time. And I have not been willing to spend at least a couple of hundred dollars to buy a device that needs to be charged almost daily, as my less expensive watch only needs a new battery every year or two. However, the only reason I can see to buy one in the future would be for the health monitoring applications.

But even as a man, I have a small wrist, even though I am 6' tall and have relatively large hands. Large watches don't fit my wrist very well, as they look oversized on me and feel uncomfortable to wear. Like ever increasing iPhone sizes, Apple Watches are getting ever larger. If I ever bought one, I would by the smallest size by necessity. Now even the smallest Apple Watch going forward, appears to be too large for me to wear comfortably. Can't we ever just be able to buy a small device, does everything have to be so big, even wearables? Sorry for the rant, just had to get it out.
 
I am not an Apple Watch owner. I never saw the reason to buy one, being that I only use a wristwatch to tell time. And I have not been willing to spend at least a couple of hundred dollars to buy a device that needs to be charged almost daily, as my less expensive watch only needs a new battery every year or two. However, the only reason I can see to buy one in the future would be for the health monitoring applications.

But even as a man, I have a small wrist, even though I am 6' tall and have relatively large hands. Large watches don't fit my wrist very well, as they look oversized on me and feel uncomfortable to wear. Like ever increasing iPhone sizes, Apple Watches are getting ever larger. If I ever bought one, I would by the smallest size by necessity. Now even the smallest Apple Watch going forward, appears to be too large for me to wear comfortably. Can't we ever just be able to buy a small device, does everything have to be so big, even wearables? Sorry for the rant, just had to get it out.
You should consider wearing it around your ankle — it should still be able to collect health data that way.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GraXXoR
I am not an Apple Watch owner. I never saw the reason to buy one, being that I only use a wristwatch to tell time. And I have not been willing to spend at least a couple of hundred dollars to buy a device that needs to be charged almost daily, as my less expensive watch only needs a new battery every year or two. However, the only reason I can see to buy one in the future would be for the health monitoring applications.

But even as a man, I have a small wrist, even though I am 6' tall and have relatively large hands. Large watches don't fit my wrist very well, as they look oversized on me and feel uncomfortable to wear. Like ever increasing iPhone sizes, Apple Watches are getting ever larger. If I ever bought one, I would by the smallest size by necessity. Now even the smallest Apple Watch going forward, appears to be too large for me to wear comfortably. Can't we ever just be able to buy a small device, does everything have to be so big, even wearables? Sorry for the rant, just had to get it out.
Me as well.

If it had a real SIM card slot somewhere and could be much more standalone device not fully tied to iPhone, it would have been my phone replacement. But since it never happened and probably never will, I don’t have a single reason to buy these watches.

Afaik it is still not possible to update Apple Watch OTA without the iPhone app, and thats quite strange considering its 2024 not 2010
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: CloneBB
Wonderful article name. "Apple Watch X? September 9 Event Date Marks Its 10th Anniversary" no. Apple Watch X hasn't been released yet, it hasn't had any anniversaries...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
Me as well.

If it had a real SIM card slot somewhere and could be much more standalone device not fully tied to iPhone, it would have been my phone replacement. But since it never happened and probably never will, I don’t have a single reason to buy these watches.

Afaik it is still not possible to update Apple Watch OTA without the iPhone app, and thats quite strange considering its 2024 not 2010
What are you talking about? There is a cellular version of the AW. I can leave my phone at home and still accept calls/messages/w/e.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.