yes, we should definitely have the lady who cleans toilet work from home.
im sure she can clean the toilets very well that way![]()
The topic was worker empowerment. Glad I could clear that up for you.
yes, we should definitely have the lady who cleans toilet work from home.
im sure she can clean the toilets very well that way![]()
Bet you anything you want that come October we'll be seeing a few articles about a group of these same lazy whiners, er Apple Employees, pissing and moaning about having to put down their early-morning cocktails, turn off The Price is Right and actually get off the couch to "wfh".The absolute vitriol and bitterness in these comments.
No, hospitalizations. The U.K. apparently now claims “only” 40% of the hospitalized are fully vaccinated, but that’s just dumb spin.
no, that was you moving the goalpost when you got put in your place.The topic was worker empowerment. Glad I could clear that up for you.
no, that was you moving the goalpost when you got put in your place.
try again.
link please. google turned up nothing.
What search terms did you use? Google is drunk with links, but here you go:
![]()
COVID-19: Vallance corrects mistake to say 60% of people being admitted to hospital with coronavirus are unvaccinated
Earlier, Sir Patrick Vallance told a news conference 60% of coronavirus-related hospital admissions were double-jabbed people - but he later corrected himself.news.sky.com
I agree. Get vaccinated and go back to work. Essentially zero hospitalizations and deaths for vaccinated folks. If someone doesn't want to get vaccinated, they can be required to wear a mask all day at work. That gets old fast. Great motivation to get the jab.They can find a new job then. This is not Apple’s job. They have a business to run. Also, vaccines are available. This is by choice.
it'd be nice to see the actual data than to hear an estimate from someone that got it wrong the first time around. also using terms like "double jabbed"
Why should we shut down again? Per the CDC, vaccinated people are: unlikely to be hospitalized, extremely unlikely to die from COVID, and very unlikely to transmit the disease because they carry a low viral load. So, who are we protecting by shutting down? 1. Adults who refuse to get vaccinated? 2. Children under 12 y.o. that can’t be vaccinated? Unvaccinated adults rolled the dice and took their chances. We can’t shut down the country while these folks figure it out. We will be waiting forever. At this point, it is like trying to convince someone to change their religion. Not going to happen. As for kids under 12, look at the data on childhood mortality from COVID. It is incredibly rare. Any child lost is tragic, but there are so many other things that kill many many more kids and we aren’t shutting the country down for them.I know this will spark outrage, but as long as half the US refuses to vaccinate, we should be shutting things down again anyway. Our response has been pathetic. Can you imagine us responding to the world wars this way? Having the tools at our disposal to defeat a common enemy and doing so little about it. The UK, as well, has been terrible.
There has been no long term planning. Our success and failure have been at the mercy of the pharmaceutical industry, which have been a godsend and the only part of this that have worked, and then we reject the gift. So we have to make alternative plans because this virus will keep mutating and the vaccines will keep getting weaker in their effect.
I say shut down the retail stores, as well. Delta is percolating in more people than we know including the vaccinated, mutating.
This is now a long term problem and it requires cohesiveness. Global vaccination. What an embarrassment that we can't even vaccinate the country where the vaccine is most available.
I doubt Apple backed down as much from the original letter's complaint as they did from the health reality that everyone is facing. But they should do the right thing and shutter the retail stores for all their employees then.
this.But think how much worse it would have been without the vaccinations in the UK for example. Their cases have skyrocketed while hospitalizations and deaths did not rise at the same rate.
.
cant people do the maths and see how vaccines have allowed people to be out and about without 1000s a day dying?
Why not slowly ramp up? As in, start with requiring people to come only 1-2 days a week and keeping them in separate groups/schedules to reduce inter-mingling, then slowly increase the # of days and increase the commingling over a few months?
I know, I’m bringing logic to a MR thread, which can be dangerous![]()
Every example shows it just backloads the effects. This religious belief is the meeting of scientific lack of articulation and popular ignorance. The "science' never said it would go away if we all stayed inside forever. No medical professional ever believed that. But people like this poster think it will do that. And, again, should not be taken seriously.
And if half the US doesnt want to get vaccinated...thats none of your business. "But they can give it to others!" Well, according to the vaccine folks, vaccinated people can still transmit it..so...
What it comes down to is the inherent helplessness of the vaccine fanatics. It will never be enough for them, they are broken, and theyre also enjoying their morality trip. I'm vaccinated, but I am not a vaccine fanatic.
Get on with your life. Let others do the same. If you're protected, you're protected. If you believe the only way to be safe is to stay inside, then you should do so, not force everyone else to.
Spreading fake information about something which then hurts the population, cause deaths, spread fear is a form of terrorism. (Might be a weak form of terrorism, but it kills thousand times more) Such people should be held responsible for their obvious lies.
One can question the quality of vaccination, but not spread information telling that it modifies DNA, kills by thousands or help the government tracking down people, inject 5G cells, make your body magnetic, etc.
Then media is your number 1 terrorist. Spreads fear just perfectly. And lies just about everything, distorting people lives, wasting their time, forcing them to think the only way to survive is to get jabbed. Works on people, who believe there is a government and not a spectacle of puppeteered dolls. If media would cease to exist - there wouldn't be a pandemic, just a new kind of seasonal flu, that's been goin' around for years, that everyone would forget about in a month.Anyone who believes shutdowns work should not be taken seriously.
Spreading fake information about something which then hurts the population, cause deaths, spread fear is a form of terrorism. (Might be a weak form of terrorism, but it kills thousand times more) Such people should be held responsible for their obvious lies.
One can question the quality of vaccination, but not spread information telling that it modifies DNA, kills by thousands or help the government tracking down people, inject 5G cells, make your body magnetic, etc.
Wow, salty much?Starting with spoiled tech workers? Why not start with the 50-year-old ladies who clean toilets for minimum wage, or the masses of people delivering things to these spoiled workers for peanuts while they’re WFH during a pandemic?
The above is nonsense. 60% of the U.K.’s new COVID hospitalizations are people who were vaccinated.