Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Selfishness should never be a motivation for 'justice'.

If apple did something wrong, I'm all for them being punished. Giving people money who never earned or were actually victimized does nothing but perpetuate our silly litigious climate that hurts EVERYONE.

A lot of people feel Apple behaved inappropriately (for reasons mentioned multiple times in this thread) and a good way to discourage similar behavior in the future is to "punish" the company financially in hopes that they (and other companies) will think twice about doing something similar (again). If that means some people will get a few bucks who don't necessarily deserve it, so be it. You can't expect things to be perfect. Even the "best" medications can have undesirable side effects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dampfnudel
A lot of people feel Apple behaved inappropriately (for reasons mentioned multiple times in this thread) and a good way to discourage similar behavior in the future is to "punish" the company financially in hopes that they (and other companies) will think twice about doing something similar (again). If that means some people will get a few bucks who don't necessarily deserve it, so be it. You can't expect things to be perfect. Even the "best" medications can have undesirable side effects.
That’s the main aim of regulators here. That is to try to persuade companies to be more transparent to consumers and not just arbitrarily as well as sneakily change something that as a result diminishes/downgrades the functionality of their products without at the very least explaining what is happening.
 
That’s the main aim of regulators here. That is to try to persuade companies to be more transparent to consumers and not just arbitrarily as well as sneakily change something that as a result diminishes/downgrades the functionality of their products without at the very least explaining what is happening.
the issue wasn’t the software update, as that actually fixed a problem.

The issue was Apple not telling people that a battery replacement would resolve it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freedomlinux
This is one of the issues that pissed me off the most, with nagging fanboys still to this day twiddling their thumbs with Apple did nothing wrong behaviour. :rolleyes:

Apple simply made way way way more money up selling new iPhone as our 6 and 6S slowed down to a crawl, and only some random guy on Reddit called them out as a battery change would bring those phones back to life at much lesser cost than buying a new phone.

In my family at least 3 iPhones were discarded and upgraded due to this, however since the revelations old iPhones are promptly given new lease of life with new batteries and are handed down.


For people who worship for profit companies do have a read “The Pinto Memo”. Where it was cheaper to pay off victims than do a known safety recall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
  • Apple made the software work well for users, great. Check. We all want this.
However.....................
No, stop there. I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about people who still believe the fix itself was the scam.
 
This is one of the issues that pissed me off the most, with nagging fanboys still to this day twiddling their thumbs with Apple did nothing wrong behaviour. :rolleyes:

Apple simply made way way way more money up selling new iPhone as our 6 and 6S slowed down to a crawl, and only some random guy on Reddit called them out as a battery change would bring those phones back to life at much lesser cost than buying a new phone.

In my family at least 3 iPhones were discarded and upgraded due to this, however since the revelations old iPhones are promptly given new lease of life with new batteries and are handed down.


For people who worship for profit companies do have a read “The Pinto Memo”. Where it was cheaper to pay off victims than do a known safety recall.
If you upgraded the phone because you were given the wrong advice from Apple as to how to restore full functionality then I agree that you should be recompensed for that.
 
My 6S was throttled after less then two years of ownership and was slower then my iPhone 6 which I still had.

Throttled iPhone 6S scores still show faster CPU than iPhone 6 scores.

Regardless you can turn it off and have full performance. Or buy a new battery when Apple offered it for cheap. Don't know what your complaint is.
 
Throttled iPhone 6S scores still show faster CPU than iPhone 6 scores.

Regardless you can turn it off and have full performance. Or buy a new battery when Apple offered it for cheap. Don't know what your complaint is.
Or just get a new battery.
 
This is one of the issues that pissed me off the most, with nagging fanboys still to this day twiddling their thumbs with Apple did nothing wrong behaviour. :rolleyes:
Different opinions for different folks. Critics don’t always have the right answer.
Apple simply made way way way more money up selling new iPhone as our 6 and 6S slowed down to a crawl, and only some random guy on Reddit called them out as a battery change would bring those phones back to life at much lesser cost than buying a new phone.
And whats the excuse other years when apple makes way more money selling iPhones.
In my family at least 3 iPhones were discarded and upgraded due to this, however since the revelations old iPhones are promptly given new lease of life with new batteries and are handed down.
In my family none were discarded. I did have my 6s batter replaced though and the phone got some new life.

For people who worship for profit companies do have a read “The Pinto Memo”. Where it was cheaper to pay off victims than do a known safety recall.
I’ll skip thank you. Of course this is the exact same situation.
 
This is what you're going to get after all the notables loudly broadcasted the settlement

mickey-bread.gif
 
That’s the scale at which apple makes money. There is no way to prove or not that consumers en-masse were “duped” by apple and went out and purchased new phones. I was an affected party and I did NOT purchase a new phone until mine was no longer useful.
Who cares if they were duped? That's not Apple's problem that their marketing works. I have a a 6s that worked better after the update
 
Have a look at my earlier post. They WERE dishonest and they KNEW it.
#76
This is just like Antennagate. Apple made a design decision that had a major flaw and people turned around and sued because they made a mistake with a brand new antenna design.

Apple was trying to solve older iPhones randomly rebooting because the battery current wasn't stable enough and the CPU was going through a reboot. Before the update happened, my 6s would randomly reboot every 4-6 hours or so, sometimes in the middle of a call. After the update years ago, it hasn't randomly rebooted since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phenste
  • Like
Reactions: BugeyeSTI
See? We agree. Took a lot of editing to get to the key sentence you wrote.

Class action lawsuits are imperfect, but they do let companies be held to account. And we agree—they did it, and covered it up for a year.
glad you were watching over my edit history my guy 😂
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.