Looks fun! https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1758810/You should totally watch The Snowman though. Stone cold classic.
Looks fun! https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1758810/You should totally watch The Snowman though. Stone cold classic.
No, the acquired the production. Meaning they funded, managed production, and approved the finished product for release. Not the same as acquiring a canned film for release.You mean Apple acquired and has on their streaming platform a film that did.
You mean Apple acquired and has on their streaming platform a film that did.
Apple did nothing but fork out $$$
So Apple did nothing except air it on their streaming channel and now they are claiming it is 'their' win, typical Apple.
Wrong.
Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy,_the_Mole,_the_Fox_and_the_Horse_(film)
Production Companies:
Apple Studios
Bad Robot Productions
NoneMore Productions
Distributors:
AppleTV+ (United States)
BBC One
BBC iPlayer (United Kingdom)
Apple funded and distributed the film in the US and BBC got paid to distribute it in the UK.
Bad Robot Production means Producer and team JJ Abrams proposed the film and bulk of production costs to several studios with Apple Studios winning the contract.
When their studio is built in Culver City I imagine a lot of projects will rely less on Bad Robot Productions and more on screenwriters directly soliciting and not selling their screenplays to JJ Abrams for a song who then sells rights including production costs for a huge profit on their part, not unlike the traditional Music Industry model.
For what it's worth, this movie was a mess. We watched it with the kids and it made next to sense. Visually it was beautiful, sure. But the dialogue was just disjointed trope-y one-liners like "you are enough" which is a fine enough message but literally had no bearing on what was actually happening. And in the end there was no real plot resolution, it just sort of ended.
I don't mind a good arthouse film but I get a little grumpy when a kid's movie leaves my kids asking me 10 million questions because nothing made sense.
LOST is a pretty terrible example, because ABC FUNDED IT & PROMOTED IT LIKE CRAZY. An exec got fired for giving them the money for the fuselage in the very first episode. Wouldn't have been possible without them. Apple here did noting but buy a finished movie off the shelf.Do you not know how TV and films are made? Studios/streamers/channels like Apple, Disney, Netflix, NBC, Warner Bros, etc rarely make any of their content directly – especially for streaming and television (films, they are more likely to directly make – but not always). Instead, they rely on production companies to make this content and pay the production companies to do so (or for the rights to air their content).
But when any TV show or movie wins an award it's the studio/streamer that is awarded the credit and not the production company.
For example, one of TV's greatest hits ever, the Lost series, was produced by Bad Robot, but whenever Lost won an award, ABC (the studio/channel that aired it) took the credit for the win.
This is standard industry practice. Not everything is a cause to shout Apple is evil.
Big difference between buying something that was already completed, and funding something as it goes.> it debuted on Apple TV+ and the BBC on Christmas Day, 2022
It was on BBC One on Christmas Eve!
> Apple did nothing but fork out $$$
What do you think they did with Ted Lasso, After Party, etc.?
That's not what they did here though. Better analogy for this situation: "Oh man, that's beautiful house...let's buy it and act like we made it"“The house was built by people, Apple did nothing but buy bricks and cement and stuff”
'Exposure' - do you even hear yourself?They didn't. Macrumors did.
But even if Apple did claim it as their win, it's for the greater good of the project:
People know Apple and where to find TV+ content. The same cannot be said for most directors/writers/artists, and certainly not the creators of this short.
So by phrasing this as a win for Apple helps get the short more exposure.
Conversely, we wouldn't even be reading about this on Macrumors if the post didn't paint this as a story about Apple.
Well, this also happens with other areas too...Apple did nothing but fork out $$$
Huh. Somebody got triggered over ...everything.'Exposure' - do you even hear yourself?
Just because it's industry practice it does not mean it is right. For years production companies of successful TV programs have complained that they do not get the credit where it is due but instead all the credit goes to the broadcaster who aired the program. Your example shows where it has gone wrong in the industry. Bad Robot, produced the series, ABC did nothing but aired it and get all the credit and awards for it. It's wrong, totally wrong and it's wrong in Apple's case too.
Now if members in here are saying it's not Apple that is saying they won the Oscar but MR then clearly the editor(s) of MR are in the wrong for miss-reporting on the win.
T
No, the acquired the production. Meaning they funded, managed production, and approved the finished product for release. Not the same as acquiring a canned film for release.
Wrong.
Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy,_the_Mole,_the_Fox_and_the_Horse_(film)
Production Companies:
Apple Studios
Bad Robot Productions
NoneMore Productions
Distributors:
AppleTV+ (United States)
BBC One
BBC iPlayer (United Kingdom)
Apple funded and distributed the film in the US and BBC got paid to distribute it in the UK.
Bad Robot Production means Producer and team JJ Abrams proposed the film and bulk of production costs to several studios with Apple Studios winning the contract.
When their studio is built in Culver City I imagine a lot of projects will rely less on Bad Robot Productions and more on screenwriters directly soliciting and not selling their screenplays to JJ Abrams for a song who then sells rights including production costs for a huge profit on their part, not unlike the traditional Music Industry model.
"People were laughing out loud in the theater at how hokey some of the lines were."I hated this film so much. The animation was fine but unspectacular, while the script was terrible. People were laughing out loud in the theater at how hokey some of the lines were.
"What do you want to be when you grow up?" "Kind."
Ugh.
I was pulling for "My Year of Dicks," which was a good film whose title did it no favors.
"People were laughing out loud in the theater at how hokey some of the lines were."
I don't think this short was distributed in cinema/theatre, it was "The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse was released in the United Kingdom through BBC One and BBC iPlayer on December 24, 2022 and in other countries on Apple TV+ on December 25, 2022". (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy,_the_Mole,_the_Fox_and_the_Horse_(film)).
Oh, and we really loved it; animation and story 😀
Watched it last night, and I agree the script wasn't at the level of the drawings and animation and felt a bit stitched. I still think it had its moments and the platitudes wasn't empty even if we've heard them all before. I think it brings up topics that are good to be reminded of every now and then.Yes. This was the most cloying thing I’ve watched in years. The script was just a bunch of empty platitudes strung together.