roadbloc is correct.
The movable type printing press was far more impactful to the world as a whole. The typewriter only generates one copy at a time.
The movable type printing press allows for mass scale reproduction in a configurable, compact device. Compare this to the previous method: laborious manuscript duplication by hand. Banks and banks of desks with copyists and illuminators copying each page one by one (where errors could easily be introduced if the copyist wasn't fluent in the language of the original manuscript).
A typewriters improve legibility however errors can be introduced into each copy. If thirty typists each copy the same document, it is likely that you will get thirty slightly different versions, with subtle errors in different places in each.
Before the Nineties, when high schools still taught typing, that was the standard test. All the students in the class copy the same work. Speed was prized, but points were deducted off the score for typographically or style errors (like wrong margins, forgetting to indent paragraphs, etc.).
The typewriter analogy was indeed the wrong one to pick.
Last edited:
