And the soft screens. Most foldables still have screens that more or less feel like soft plastic even though they branded it ultra thin glass.This would be excellenté if they can get rid of the crease.
And the soft screens. Most foldables still have screens that more or less feel like soft plastic even though they branded it ultra thin glass.This would be excellenté if they can get rid of the crease.
Yup...give me a dang ipad that when I connect a keyboard and pointing device it gives me full MacOSI would rather Apple focus on running macOS and iPadOS consecutively. It's the Operating System that is going to make a big difference.
Exactly this. People don’t even believe that Apple’s trackpads don’t have built-in physical buttons, but they don’t.They also made the Home Button on iPhone and the Trackpad for Mac which are absolute world-class examples of haptic buttons for which there are no remotely similar examples on the market.
Sounds like it's going to be similar to thisFor a company that made the Touch bar which was not very liked as per its lack of actual physical buttons and good haptic feedback, I cannot really see a product such as this working out.
People seem to like actual physical buttons. Perhaps as an iPad where we are already used to using external keyboards or typing on screen, but as a notebook? No. Built in keyboard will continue reigning supreme.
Too complicated. Why would one want to go from the much more open MacOS, to locked down iPadOS on the same device?
90% of the people on this forum does not equal 90% of the peopleDid you even read the thread? Or any thread about any rumored foldable device? 90% of people are against Apple doing anything in this space.
I hate to be one of those people who just says "I don't understand this" but I really don't understand this.
Fine. Go ask any real human being if they want folding devices. No one does.90% of the people on this forum does not equal 90% of the people
Not for real work they don't. Doesn't matter which breed of users it is. The devices don't have different capabilities depending on when you born.There is a new breed of users that do the majority of input on touch devices. Phones, iPads etc. They will be happy.
Technically it can have that, and technically it can fail miserably because it needs far more than that to be usable.Well technically speaking the display can have touch capabilities with haptic feedback. So it’s the same keyboard as on iOS. I guess if you want a trackpad then you can have the trackpad section down just like on a regular MacBook. 🤷♂️ So it’s not physical, just represented on the touch display.
You are a person. You are not people. Drawing is not what the iPad is mostly used for. It is mostly used for video, as Apple has said, and as users widely acknowledge. Games come in second. Productivity apps somewhere behind that. Drawing/writing are a niche use case.Yahhs. I use the iPad mainly for illustrating children’s books. the only other alternative is buying a giant non foldable drawing pad, which you have to connect to a Mac/pc. This would actually enhance workflow for a lot of artists. A lot professional artists illustrate on the iPad at Pixar, DC, Marvel etc.
People don't need paid apps to do what they do on iPad. Which is streaming video, for the most part. Followed by gaming, with producitivity and drawing lagging way way behind. This has been demonstrated many times. Come on. You can do a lot better than "I draw, therefor everyone draws on iPad". No. "Everyone" watches streaming video on iPad. That's like 90% of the devices use. The remaining 10% scrambles for the rest.Judging by the fact that Procreate has consistently been the top selling paid app on the iPad for years at this point, I’d say that’s the reality, quite simply.