Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not to those who know what 'complication' stands for on mechanical watches. And not for those that don't know it but then just look it up. Of course, for those that don't know it and don't look it up ...

Just looked it up and learned something new today - thanks! Obviously I was a member of the latter group!
 
Using a watch to control my TV.

That's genius! .......geniusly stupid, that is. But at least it would be better than the remote we have now.

What if you could lift your watch and say, "Siri, play Game of Thrones", and have the Apple TV automatically play the latest unwatched episode?
 
I guess i will wait on iWatch 2. As much as I want one for no good real reason, waiting until next year will allow all you beta testers to deal with the 1st gen issues and apps. You guys are awesome!
I can't speak for everyone, but I'm sure that a majority of us early adopters bought the watch not because it was just a shiny new gadget, but because it meets our current needs exactly. I was a bit hesitant on buying a first gen device, but I honestly can't think of any issues I have with my Steel Watch. The biggest and only one that comes to mind is that it takes a while to turn on compared to an iPhone or Mac, but then patience is a virtue. Battery life on it has exceeded my expectations and I can usually get more than a day and a half with my Watch with moderate use.
I love the convenience of wearing a watch that motivates me to be more active while also keeping me informed on current events with the NY Times app and giving me relevant notifications as they appear. I hardly ever use my 6 Plus anymore, which is hard to believe considering how three weeks ago I was so attached to it. The 2nd gen will definitely be better, but why endure the wait if the current product does all that you want/need it to.
 
It better happen because Apple is getting the pants beat off it with competitors in the TV area.

I sure hope they give us some control over how the channel line up is displayed so we can either delete, heaven forbid!, or at least hide the ones we don't want on the main selection screen.

Please, Apple!

Lol.
They don't have the content agreements in place to make anything other than the lame "watch crap like Hulu from a grid" that they currently have.
Also... NOBODY does. So....... your "getting pants beat off" statement is pretty asinine.
What current set top box allows users to cut ties with cable & pick and choose all their fave shows from any network, for a reasonable fee??
Oh yeah... none. There are NO compelling products in this space. NOBODY is winning in this area. NOBODY is "beating the pants off" anybody.
Cable is still the big unchallenged bully it has always been & it doesn't look like anyone has created a viable alternative.
 
Cec

Would be nice if the aTV could have an IR sender that would control my cable box and TV. Then I could get rid of that moronic remote Samsung makes and Time Warner requires.

Even better if they would support HDMI CEC. Then you could really hide the Apple TV behind the TV.

Daniel
 
i sure hope they give us some control over how the channel line up is displayed so we can either delete, heaven forbid!, or at least hide the ones we don't want on the main selection screen.
rtfm
 
I can't speak for everyone, but I'm sure that a majority of us early adopters bought the watch not because it was just a shiny new gadget, but because it meets our current needs exactly. I was a bit hesitant on buying a first gen device, but I honestly can't think of any issues I have with my Steel Watch. The biggest and only one that comes to mind is that it takes a while to turn on compared to an iPhone or Mac, but then patience is a virtue. Battery life on it has exceeded my expectations and I can usually get more than a day and a half with my Watch with moderate use.
I love the convenience of wearing a watch that motivates me to be more active while also keeping me informed on current events with the NY Times app and giving me relevant notifications as they appear. I hardly ever use my 6 Plus anymore, which is hard to believe considering how three weeks ago I was so attached to it. The 2nd gen will definitely be better, but why endure the wait if the current product does all that you want/need it to.

You guys are godsends is what you are! Keep up the good work!
 
Does anybody else find the term "complications" to be a poor word choice to describe a feature? Seems like it conveys an unwanted message.
"Complications" is a horology (the study of clocks and watches) term, not one that Apple coined.
 
Having used my watch for a couple weeks now I'm finding a few usability annoyances that Apple needs to correct in future updates. For example, I needed to mail a birthday card today so I asked Siri on AW to give me the address of "Jane Doe". I was told the address would be in handoff on my iPhone screen! C'mon, if I wanted to pull my iPhone out I would have done that. I bought the AW so I wouldn't have to do that for micro-tasks.
 
I would LOVE an HDMI passthrough option (similar to XBONE) on the new Apple TV, but I suppose that would conflict with their plans for the subscription service.
 
I can't believe this was upvoted. The last thing Apple should do is abandon investment in Siri and technologies like Handoff. Voice isn't dead. In fact Microsoft is making huge investments in Cortana and wants it everywhere. IMO Apple's problem is they haven't improved Siri fast enough and spent too much time on silly things like having Siri bring back cutsy/smart alec responses to queries. Apple needs to get better at push and predictive. The Watch will force them to do that as its strengths are in push, not pull, not go launch an app for everything you want to do.

No.

I truly believe that voice/Siri is a niche feature that hardly anyone uses and will remain so for as long as it exists. Not once have I seen or heard anyone use it. It's an incredibly slow and inefficient way to get things done. Touch and typing is quicker, easier and more reliable, and is possible 100% of the time, whereas Siri is possible only when no-one is near you and where it is quiet.

Handoff could become useful one day, but in its present state, it's far too buggy and slow. Again, though, it's terribly niche. How many people really need to urgently switch from their iPhone to their Mac? Emails and documents get saved automatically anyway; it's not like you save any time. If everything syncs via iCloud, there is no need for the clunkiness of Handoff.
 
No.
I truly believe that voice/Siri is a niche feature that hardly anyone uses and will remain so for as long as it exists.
You can believe whatever you want, doesn't make it a fact.
Not once have I seen or heard anyone use it.
Anecdotal therefore irrelevant to the masses at large.
It's an incredibly slow and inefficient way to get things done. Touch and typing is quicker, easier and more reliable, and is possible 100% of the time, whereas Siri is possible only when no-one is near you and where it is quiet.
Again, anecdotal.
 
I don't wish to sound overly negative, but I hope Apple spends as little as possible on Siri or abandons it. It's hopeless. Voice is a dead-end that will only ever be useful for the blind. It's one of the big minuses of the Apple Watch, along with no GPS and a reliance on Bluetooth. I feel the same about Handoff.

What I would like is for Apple to stop my iPad Air 2 and iPhone 5 from rebooting daily and to fix the myriad bugs that should have been fixed years ago. Bring a proper sepia mode to both Yosemite and iOS, allow font sizes to be increased universally—especially on the App Store, the Mac App Store, the iTunes Store and iBooks; those app descriptions are tiny. Allow more than five photos for app descriptions. Allow more than 30 seconds for previews. Increase tv show previews to 90 seconds. Bring split screen to the iPad. Bring proper file management to iOS. Bring PDF to print to iOS.

HELL YES!!!!!! Make my Apple crap basics work again!!!!!!!!


You guys are godsends is what you are! Keep up the good work!

Hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.
 
Yeah, the people saying Siri isn't worth improving have no idea what they're talking about. The future of technology is going to be voice-control. It's the stuff of sci-fi films but is slowly becoming reality. I'll admit that Siri isn't perfect but that's exactly why Apple should improve it.

Right now, I only use Siri for simple things like setting alarms and timers, sending text messages, asking about the weather and playing music. But with serious improvements, Siri could theoretically be used to do *anything* on iOS and that's exciting to me.
 
No.

I truly believe that voice/Siri is a niche feature that hardly anyone uses and will remain so for as long as it exists. Not once have I seen or heard anyone use it.

Me, just a few minutes ago as I was preparing lunch: "Hey Siri, add Cliff bars to the grocery list."

I use it all the time and hope it only continues to improve. It's made leaps and bounds in the recent year with context-aware word substitution. I'm amazed at how well it figures things out dynamically, and even capitalizes proper names, like "Cliff" in the above example.

Other things I do, "Hey Siri, will it be hot today?" ... "And tomorrow?" That didn't used to work. We're getting closer.

It's an incredibly slow and inefficient way to get things done. Touch and typing is quicker, easier and more reliable, and is possible 100% of the time, whereas Siri is possible only when no-one is near you and where it is quiet.

I use Siri when it saves me time or when my hands or eyes are busy with other tasks, such as cooking.

Siri is far from perfect, but it has become useful enough to no longer be a novelty. Granted, we're not at the point of interacting with a human that can understand things like "Hey Siri, what was um, uh, that nifty drill bit index we saw at the hardware store?" ... "Oh that's right. Add it to the list for next time. No, actually, see if you can find it cheaper on Amazon, and if so, go ahead and order it for delivery to work by Tuesday if that's possible. Let me know."
 
If stating facts that are common knowledge is anecdotal, then yes, I agree with you.

Common knowledge is more than just your opinion. In my experience, Siri on the watch works very well - much better than Alexa (Amazon Echo) and Siri on the iPhone. There is a role for the keyboard, but there is a role for voice control as well.

I can type 90wpm on a real keyboard, but I almost never need to type 90wpm on my phone. In fact, typing on the watch is an order of magnitude more difficult than on the old feature phones...which is why I have a phone and a computer.

IRL the convenience/difficulty tradeoff is acceptable to me.

It's just like when old telco guys complain about voice quality. Sure cell quality isn't as good as a landline, but I'm not about to string cable behind me just to make a phone call.
 
If stating facts that are common knowledge is anecdotal, then yes, I agree with you.
anecdotal

[an-ik-doht-l, an-ik-doht-l]

adjective

3. based on personal observation, case study reports, or random investigations rather than systematic scientific evaluation: anecdotal evidence.
I truly believe that voice/Siri is a niche feature that hardly anyone uses and will remain so for as long as it exists. ...snip
Not once have I seen or heard anyone use it. It's an incredibly slow and inefficient way to get things done. Touch and typing is quicker, easier and more reliable, and is possible 100% of the time, whereas Siri is possible only when no-one is near you and where it is quiet.

You are not a fact.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.