So apple is going to copy another companies idea and app?
Where have i heard this before
And you have a problem with this why? If Apple can do it better than what is out there what should stop them?
Didnt Samsung do exactly that also.
That is a pretty distorted image you have of musicians. Most of the musicians I know understand themselves as people who make music, not records. They get a tiny fraction of the money that the record companies make anyway.All of these services discussed are incredibly poor for the musician.
The musician is faced with 'ok people are grabbing your records for free, let's make them pay 0.0000005 cents per play, it's better than nothing. That is.. if they can be bothered to sign up. Oh and it might actually not be quite 0.000005'
again apple copies ... time they came up with their own ideas. they sue samsung for a rounded rectangle cell phone and then want to copy pandora. Apple really needs to get their crap together.
Apple is rapidly falling far from the tree.
The new Kindle Fire HD is a great example.
While I do agree that spotify is a good option, I'm not sure that's due to value specifically.
Spotify Premium is £9.99 a month in the UK. So that's about £120 a year. For that £120 I could buy an album at £7.99 every 3.5 weeks. And since there are a lot of albums that are far cheaper than that I can probably buy about 16-17 albums in a year for that money (assuming £6.99 on average). That's far more than most music fans would buy. It's definitely more than I would tend to purchase in any given year.
The other thing to keep in mind is that the number of albums you buy is probably going to drop off as you get older. My dad used to buy lots of music when he was my age but rarely does now. So over a lifetime the amount I spend in iTunes will go down while the money I would have to spend on Spotify would remain the same.
Another big point is that money spent on iTunes is music for life. If Apple goes bankrupt and iTunes closes down I still have a library of DRM free music to listen to for as long as I live. If Spotify were to go bust tomorrow, on the other hand, a Spotify user would have nothing at all to show for all the money they've spent.
Spotify is a great option for many reasons but the value proposition of owning your own music, in the long run, is probably greater. That isn't to say that renting or subscription type services are not good. I find it's better to rent most movies since you may only watch a movie once or twice in the whole time you own it. Music, on the other hand, is listened to many, many times.
there goes my data plan.
although, if they just let me stream my iTunes, i'll be plenty happy with that.
Maybe I'm in the minority, but I bought the Hi-Fi in/around 2006... it's survived 9-10 cottage weekends in less than stellar weather, performed incredibly well for house parties and acts as my main speaker sitting below my TV with the optical-in (small place, don't need big surround sytem). It was definitely worth the price. If I could buy another one for when this one eventually stops working, I definitely would.
only if you're like old people who end up listening only to music they grew up with. i grew up in the 80's but listen to A LOT of today's music
With iMessage, Apple bypassed carrier data plans for text messaging. People love streaming music, but it's a data hog. I wonder if this is a sort of iMessage for music, again bypassing carrier data and going directly through Apple's servers. That way people wouldn't have to worry about how much music they stream. For a lot of iPhone users, this could be a big deal.
If this keeps up, Apple will pretty much be their own carrier without technically being one.
Because cats are awesome.
It doesn't hit Apple's servers until it's already gone through the carrier's data connection, using your data plan. What it bypasses is carrier's SMS servers.With iMessage, Apple bypassed carrier data plans for text messaging. People love streaming music, but it's a data hog. I wonder if this is a sort of iMessage for music, again bypassing carrier data and going directly through Apple's servers.
only if you're like old people who end up listening only to music they grew up with. i grew up in the 80's but listen to A LOT of today's music
I think improving Match would be better than trying to piggy back on an already awesome service.
Yes, because why pay twice? I´d love to have it integrated into the Match Service.
But you're ok with the fact that they know every single app you downloaded, every song you've bought from iTunes, and even your location?