Since it is basically an iPad in a bigger case, I bet it has a all-day battery and usb C for power, instead of a line level power supply.
PCIe still takes a lot of space, and TB3 is not a viable alternative yet.With 3.5inch drive bays now antiquated and 2.5 inch drive bays antiquated and SATA antiquated ... and blown to bits by tiny NMVE M2 drives .. the need for large enclosures has been significantly removed for most users. I am quite excited to see this, and can see it as the replacement for my beloved R2D2 trashcan Mac Pro.
Each NUMA node has other costs too, but yes, I'm hopeful.Apologies if this has already been brought up, but this could see the return of a multi-processor Mac Pro: the 'A' chips cost Apple next to nothing compared to the several hundred to a few thousand dollars that each Xeon costs. Sticking four twelve-core chips in there might cost Apple a hundred dollars, based on estimates of 'A'-series chips to Apple. Add to that the vast engineering simplification brought about by the reduced thermal load, and we might see the return of a £2500 Mac Pro... we can hope.
https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks says they're competitive.Especially when those Intel chips can’t compete with AMD’s Epyc chips.
Both. I'm glad I didn't buy a newer Intel Mac Pro, but I will probably get an AS Mac once they're well settled in. I haven't updated my stuff in years, and soon I'll finally have a reason to.I feel bad for the people who buy the first rev of a new architecture.
totally agree.Don't feel bad, mine rocks and will be serving me for a very long time![]()
that is called iMac or iMac Pro.Many independent creatives simply want a machine that balances power and affordability. These are the people that adopted the higher level machines in studios around the globe and essentially 'made' Apple before it got into consumer gadgets. The current Mac Pro basically shows the middle finger to those long term users, along with potential new ones - it's simply not justifiable cost wise. £700 for a set of castors and £940 for a screen stand underlines that blatant disrespect for for that brand loyalty. Any new machine needs to embrace its potential userbase - not take the p**s out of it.
dont feel bad, that mac will work perfectly for them for another 3 years
And remember, while this is still under R&D and it will be next year also, those people who already bought that mac year ago, are making money with no issues
They'll lose OS support in just a few years. Look what happened with Power PC.Why? They'll still run for eons.
Not only dated but somewhat myopic as demonstrated by Amazon, Microsoft, and even Nvidia who either have gone ARM, have tried to go ARM, or are trying to buy ARM.Dated, but a look at the head wind Apple is facing, from Linus Torvalds.
I guess those people were not buying as a hobby enthusiast but for a professional purpose which justified the cost. And they will get good use out of the machine even after the Apple Silicon Macs came along. So where's the harm?I feel bad for the people that dropped over 50K for one of the Intel models.
I like the cube and still own one.Love to see another G4 styled cube.
your theory is entirely based on your own view and your view cannot represent all situations. what if I can earn more than 50K USD in 3 years so the Mac Pro is paid off. I am talking about real professional unlike a YouTuber claims themselves as professional ......No, actually do. Those machines will lose value at an absolutely crazy rate making them an extremely bad and costly business purchase. Case in point: G5 Powermacs. Also, 3 years from a 50k computer is an absolute joke, you expect 3 years from a $400 laptop, not a top tier workstation.
I did a detailed post on this. The first Intel mac came out January 2006 with support for PowerPC formally ending with Lion (July 20, 2011) - there was a Software Update option of adding Rosetta to Snow Leopard which didn't get clobbered until Security Update 2012-001. I would hardly call half a decade "just a few years". In the computer world that is an effective eternity..They'll lose OS support in just a few years. Look what happened with Power PC.
Yeah! Like a 3 year lifespan is a joke.No, actually do. Those machines will lose value at an absolutely crazy rate making them an extremely bad and costly business purchase. Case in point: G5 Powermacs. Also, 3 years from a 50k computer is an absolute joke, you expect 3 years from a $400 laptop, not a top tier workstation.
Why different interfaces? Options.Well there is the eGPU option though I have to ask just how many people outside the low end Mac Pro crowd will use 1-2 PCIe x4 and given USB 3.1 Type-C is faster then SATA III why in the name of sanity would you want something with slower through put?! Never miming that if you ling out an iMac Pro you are going to go past the ~$7000 for the lowest end Mac Pro you can expand. iMHO you are suggesting a product that given its nitche audience is effectively the solution to a non-existent problem.
With 3.5inch drive bays now antiquated and 2.5 inch drive bays antiquated and SATA antiquated ... and blown to bits by tiny NMVE M2 drives .. the need for large enclosures has been significantly removed for most users. I am quite excited to see this, and can see it as the replacement for my beloved R2D2 trashcan Mac Pro.
With all due respect Linus has limited real world knowledge outside of operating system development.Dated, but a look at the head wind Apple is facing, from Linus Torvalds.
For sure the new MacPro will not have a battery at all, since it's a desktop. It might be able to run on USB power however. That would be pretty cool. Forget adding power hungry extension boards then though.Since it is basically an iPad in a bigger case, I bet it has a all-day battery and usb C for power, instead of a line level power supply.
Not only dated, but outdated.Dated, but a look at the head wind Apple is facing, from Linus Torvalds.
It seems we have two parties.I guess those people were not buying as a hobby enthusiast but for a professional purpose which justified the cost. And they will get good use out of the machine even after the Apple Silicon Macs came along. So where's the harm?