Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Lol. Love it. apple already makes you pay up for the better camera on the 5.5" model over the 4.7" model...now they are going to make you pay up from the regular 5.5" model to get the OLED 5.5" model. I don't think I like this business model. It cheapens both the regular 4.7" and 5.5" model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
No one cares that the Edge concept was from Apple's 2011 patents that Samsung ripped off? Samsung is still doing what they have always done. Copy. Their ideas (Samsung) come from insider knowledge of prototypes that may or may not ever be used. Anyone that has ever lived in Korea know the culture does not teach creativity. They copy and essentially make good on existing tech.
 
Am I missing something here? my iPhone 6 has a curved screen with wasted real estate why are so many people surprised this (article) is not just a natural progression.

??
 
Its obvious Tim doesn't know where to go from here (Steve's best talent) . smartphones are a huge business and I think Apple should do 4 models to cover this global market:
1-Pro for the pro user
2-Your standard iphone
3-The smaller size one (iphone 5 size)
4-A very cheap and small entry model like an iPod touch for those who can't afford the higher prices.

this should cover it all imho


Tim was not Steve's "best talent," perhaps the least compartmentalized and best of inside staff to take over. But I'd disagree that he is the smartest person at Apple. But even if he was, smart and being able to manage the brilliance of others are not linked. A lot of smart people can't manage. Not every brain surgeon has the ability to be Chief of Staff.

If this rumor becomes reality it will cement that Tim really does not understand Steve's credo of limited models to limit consumer confusion. Apple was accessible to non-techie types because they didn't burden consumers with millions of model choices. There was similar Pro and Consumer and laptop and desktop. Perhaps Steve bent his rule a bit with the Mac mini, but its a very different machine than the iMac.

Now Apple is proliferating models with different feature sets while advertising OSes with features that some of the latest hardware can't do. That's insane. Making two iPhones, same size, one with an LCD, one with OLED, again, wow! Idiotic. Make one 4.7 model and make it mind-blowing. Do the same with a 5.5. Easy buy.

To your point. It's still too crowded. A "pro" phone? C'mon. There is no "pro" use for a phone, like say, a computer, or a drill, or mixer. A "pro" line just confuses people and sounds ridiculous. Keep it simple with just one iPhone: Big, bigger, biggest. The "pro" moniker is getting out of hand. Pretty soon McDonalds will rename it's large size "pro."

Cheap model - nix it. High production cost, low profit. That's not Apple's business model, or at least wasn't. If Apple wants to start to chase marketshare at the expense of margin then all is lost with Apple innovation.
 
No one cares that the Edge concept was from Apple's 2011 patents that Samsung ripped off? Samsung is still doing what they have always done. Copy. Their ideas (Samsung) come from insider knowledge of prototypes that may or may not ever be used. Anyone that has ever lived in Korea know the culture does not teach creativity. They copy and essentially make good on existing tech.

Yes mate, Samsung makes products based on wide spread industrial espionage quick call Tim and tell him to call the FBI oh wait.....

Your comment is both racist and desperately seeking some truth..
[doublepost=1471890545][/doublepost]
Tim was not Steve's "best talent," perhaps the least compartmentalized and best of inside staff to take over. But I'd disagree that he is the smartest person at Apple. But even if he was, smart and being able to manage the brilliance of others are not linked. A lot of smart people can't manage. Not every brain surgeon has the ability to be Chief of Staff.

If this rumor becomes reality it will cement that Tim really does not understand Steve's credo of limited models to limit consumer confusion. Apple was accessible to non-techie types because they didn't burden consumers with millions of model choices. There was similar Pro and Consumer and laptop and desktop. Perhaps Steve bent his rule a bit with the Mac mini, but its a very different machine than the iMac.

Now Apple is proliferating models with different feature sets while advertising OSes with features that some of the latest hardware can't do. That's insane. Making two iPhones, same size, one with an LCD, one with OLED, again, wow! Idiotic. Make one 4.7 model and make it mind-blowing. Do the same with a 5.5. Easy buy.

To your point. It's still too crowded. A "pro" phone? C'mon. There is no "pro" use for a phone, like say, a computer, or a drill, or mixer. A "pro" line just confuses people and sounds ridiculous. Keep it simple with just one iPhone: Big, bigger, biggest. The "pro" moniker is getting out of hand. Pretty soon McDonalds will rename it's large size "pro."

Cheap model - nix it. High production cost, low profit. That's not Apple's business model, or at least wasn't. If Apple wants to start to chase marketshare at the expense of margin then all is lost with Apple innovation.

Post of the thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
No one cares that the Edge concept was from Apple's 2011 patents that Samsung ripped off? Samsung is still doing what they have always done. Copy. Their ideas (Samsung) come from insider knowledge of prototypes that may or may not ever be used. Anyone that has ever lived in Korea know the culture does not teach creativity. They copy and essentially make good on existing tech.
Be careful, Zelots from the other camp will say "Production > Patent" and that Apple was too late, and will still be a copycat regardless of the recorded evidence.

That said, I stand within both camps. I see Samsung as a leader in innovation alongside Apple. They both push the technology forward, and bring unique ideas to the table, sometimes implementing them in similar ways that remain true to the core values. I just don't see this single feature (curved edge screen) as having much use in it's current implementation.

Lets hope they keep putting out ideas that can be considered copy bait.
 
Samsung AMOLED has always on, it consumes only about ~0.7%/hour at high brightness. It makes for a decent night clock.

If apple only releases what the rumours predict, they would be like a century behind.

I didn't realize that there were smartphones in 1916/1917
 
  • Like
Reactions: 840quadra



Apple is planning to release at least three new iPhones next year, including a high-end model with a 5.5-inch-or-larger OLED display that is curved on both sides like Samsung's Galaxy S7 edge, according to Nikkei. The other two models are said to be 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch models with flat LCD displays like the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus, corroborating previous reports.

Galaxy-S7-iPhone-6s.jpg

The report reiterates that Samsung is expected to be Apple's primary supplier of OLED displays, but it may be unable to fully keep up with demand for both iPhones and its own Galaxy smartphones. Recognizing the opportunity, Apple manufacturer Foxconn has been developing glass casings and OLED displays over the past year, in hopes of securing orders from its biggest customer next year.

Apple's widely rumored transition towards OLED in 2017 is requisite for curved displays, while the technology also provides improved contrast, faster response times, better viewing angles, better power efficiency for typical mixed image content, and other benefits compared to LCD technology. Samsung's Galaxy S7 makes a compelling case for Apple's rumored switch to OLED technology.

Today's report corroborates KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who earlier said Apple may launch an all-new iPhone with a curved 5.8-inch AMOLED display and glass casing in 2017. Kuo's research note outlined three new iPhone models, including LCD-based 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch models and a high-end OLED-based 5.8-inch model, as one possibility providing supply of AMOLED displays is sufficient.

When applied to the height of an existing 5.5-inch iPhone, a 5.8-inch display like the one Apple is rumored to be working on would leave an extra 7.25mm of display on each side that could be used to wrap around the edges of the device. This would extend the display across the front and sides of the iPhone, perhaps enabling side-based gestures and buttons like on Samsung's Galaxy S7 edge.

iphonewraparounddisplay-800x511.jpg

Apple was similarly rumored to be developing three iPhone models internally this year, but it reportedly scrapped plans to release a 5.5-inch model with a single-lens camera around six months ago. Apple's tenth-anniversary iPhone is shaping up to be a more significant upgrade, compared to the relatively incremental refresh expected from this year's tentatively named iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus.

Article Link: Apple's 2017 Curved OLED iPhone to Be a New Premium Model
 
I'd go for the curved 5.8-inch...

497045-samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-inline.jpg


I can see Apple's phones extending all the way to the back
 
Apple is behind on technology. What's the surprise of this rumor? Apple been playing catchup a couple years after Steve passed. They don't have a new an innovator anymore.
 
I'd go for the curved 5.8-inch...

samsung-galaxy-note-edge-02.jpg


Unlike this, Apple's would be on *both* sides :cool:

LOL, that is quite literally Samsung's first attempt at "edge" that was on the Note 5. for the S6 Edge +, S7 Edge, and Note 7, the curve is on both sides of the display.
 
Sounds great to me

Least they are giving you the choice between a flat version and a curved and it's not forced on you.
 
Lol. Love it. apple already makes you pay up for the better camera on the 5.5" model over the 4.7" model...now they are going to make you pay up from the regular 5.5" model to get the OLED 5.5" model. I don't think I like this business model. It cheapens both the regular 4.7" and 5.5" model.
Better get with the new Apple program. Pedestrian (non Pro) devices at a premium and "Pro" devices for your right arm (or leg). :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
What happened to the rumor of one all sized front-screen? Meaning where the screen reaches the top and bottom edges of the device with a home button behond the screen using 3d touch/force touch...

Guess it's still a rumor, but that I would like to see happening.
[doublepost=1471892123][/doublepost]
Sounds great to me

Least they are giving you the choice between a flat version and a curved and it's not forced on you.

What choice then? What if you want curved but not a super sized iPhone?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Col4bin
LOL, that is quite literally Samsung's first attempt at "edge" that was on the Note 5. for the S6 Edge +, S7 Edge, and Note 7, the curve is on both sides of the display.

yes the egde of the screen will have 'ticker tape' type news articles , facebook posts, twitter posts texts weather, stock prices, going around the edge of the screen - very cool.

I always knew there would be a limit to the outside of the smartphone - we are nearing it.

I would be happy with the above use of the 'edge' - zero basel -haptic home button - 3 sizes - wireless charging with no change for 5 years externally (camera exception).
internally yes battery esp we need two to three days solid use.
But only changes inside needed.
 
What happened to the rumor of one all sized front-screen? Meaning where the screen reaches the top and bottom edges of the device with a home button behond the screen using 3d touch/force touch...

Guess it's still a rumor, but that I would like to see happening.
[doublepost=1471892123][/doublepost]

What choice then? What if you want curved but not a super sized iPhone?
Not sure why people would want a smaller phone with a curved screen. It's built for a bigger device more often than not.
 
Yes mate, Samsung makes products based on wide spread industrial espionage quick call Tim and tell him to call the FBI oh wait.....

Your comment is both racist and desperately seeking some truth..
[doublepost=1471890545][/doublepost]

Post of the thread.
Culture is not race. The whole calling somebody racist schtick has lost it's power and has been played out thanks to calling out the big scary boogieman like you are here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Col4bin
I have always hated Samsung curved phones. Everything they have done I haven't liked. It makes using the phone feel awkward in my opinion. If Apple does have a curved glass iPhoned, I think they have something more planed then just to copy samsung. I really don't know though. I personally willl never buy an iPhone with more features if the screen is bigger. I hate the plus sized iphone, so if the iPhone that is curved is exclusive to the plus, I wouldn't buy it.

That is all my opinion. It is subjective. Im sure lots of people like the bigger iPhone more then the smalller one and Im sure people like the idea of a curved iPhone, but I for one, dont.

I'm not sure about the curved display. But the 5.5 iPhone is to large for me too. Even with reachability, it's too large and cumbersome. I own the SE now and cannot wait to upgrade back to the 4.7 iPhone 7. It's the perfect size for me. It took three different size iPhones for me to Realize the 4.7 iPhone is the perfect size.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.