Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here's a comparison of transistors across Apple's chips:
M1: _ _ _ 16 billion
A18 Pro: 20 billion
M2: _ _ _ 20 billion
M3: _ _ _ 25 billion
M4: _ _ _ 28 billion
M5: . . . ~28 billion (estimated)

A low-cost MacBook with the A18 Pro will have more transistors than the M1 MacBook Air had when it debuted in 2020. It would also equal the transistor count that the M2 MacBook Air had when it came out in 2022. In view of that, any customer who might be content with the performance of the M2 MacBook Air will likely be satisfied with the performance of this MacBook. They'll be even happier to have such a capable laptop at a reduced price and under a brand-new One Year Limited Warranty with the option of paying for an AppleCare+ plan.
It’s a lower TDP SoC than the M2, and with less cores, half the performance cores of the M2 (and a more anemic GPU as well). I would expect this machine to match, maybe exceed, the performance of the M1 MBA, it wont pass the M2 except maybe for limited duration single core tasks
 
I'd really like to replace my 2017 12" Macbook, which is great for travel.
Right now I'm typing on it in India (I live in the US).
However, I'd like to have >= 16GB RAM, since that's what I have on my almost 9 y.o. machine.
It would be good to have at least two USB C ports. I use my current machine for presentations, so being able to both connect to a power supply and a projector at the same time would avoid some stress!
 
  • Love
Reactions: topocalypse
I’m honestly not sure where this fits into the MacBook/iPad ecosystem.

What they are building is basically a more expensive Chromebook. Maybe an education market or something?

Pricing would have to be around $499-$599 to not rob your MacBook Air sales, but I’m not sure that would compete with the Google Chromebook education market which I think is sub $299?
 
I hope it has magsafe, even if it doesn't come with the cable (and that's such an Apple thing to do!), I just hope it has the port.

It might, but i don’t think it will have more than one port; if that’s the case i’d much rather it was type-C.

I’ve had magsafe on my last two 14” macbook pros and i barely use it. Why?

I use the same cables (and charger!) for the ipad, mac and iphone now and the other two devices don’t have magsafe
When on my desk, i’m plugged into a thunderbolt dock (no cable dangling somewhere to be tripped on).

When i’m not at a desk, the devices nowadays have enough battery life that i don’t need to live on the charger.


obviously other’s usage may differ, but if you are using multiple apple devices, magsafe is of questionable value these days (it can’t do data) and on a small device having a port of questionable value that needs magnets in it that take up even more space and expense… i don’t think its coming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RowellE
I had used M3 Pro macbook with 8GB, M1 and M2 Macbooks with 8GB as well. I am not scared of 12GB either. Currently using M4 Macbook Air with 16GB
 
Should be the A19 Pro - keeps up with M2 and M3 which means it'll last longer and it has 12GB instead of 8GB which is much more reasonable
The A18 Pro is fast enough in the CPU department, single-threaded performance is all that matters for this machine. For the GPU we'll have to see, for the RAM you are absolutely right.
 
Well, if this comes out lighter/thinner than Air, it should be renamed Air, and the Air - into just MacBook. As it should last time when they had that micro MacBook - which was actually cool device.

And now when thinking about it - oh, I miss butterfly keyboard (may be unpopular opinion but still!) - I had it on my MBP 2017 - god I loved it! Yes, there were problems with dust, but the feel was great. I still can't believe that whole technical genius of Apple and lots of cash couldn't solve this engineering problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wieslawo
If it is $799, then it make zero sense because MacBookAir M4 is practically selling at $749 90% of the time on Amazon.

If it $599 I highly doubt it will come with 16GB of Ram and likely 8GB which is junk.

If it is $699 with 12GB then why would anyone buy this and not the MacBook Air M4 previously?

Basically I think the whole MacBook pricing strategy is a messed up.
 
$699/$799 price isn't "low cost" when Amazon sells an actual MacBook Air for $749. You can do better, Tim Apple!
And what do you think this new MacBook will cost on Amazon in a year?

This machine’s primary task is to cut manufacturing cost of these Amazon discounts. Similar specs, similar price, but lower cost manufacturing.
 
I'd really like to replace my 2017 12" Macbook, which is great for travel.
Right now I'm typing on it in India (I live in the US).
However, I'd like to have >= 16GB RAM, since that's what I have on my almost 9 y.o. machine.
It would be good to have at least two USB C ports. I use my current machine for presentations, so being able to both connect to a power supply and a projector at the same time would avoid some stress!
Trust me, this machine with 8GB ram will be SIGNIFICANTLY faster than your 12” MacBook, ESPECIALLY for tasks requiring a lot of RAM, ironically… I base this on my 8GB M1 Air. This will be faster.
 
If/when this goes on sale at below 600.-, I’ll likely buy one for my daughter. Light school work, YouTube, Roblox. Perfect device for that, 8GB or not. She currently does this on an old 4GB Windows PC. The people whining about 8GB on an entry computer does not understand what “Entry” means.

Lenovo still sells 4GB PC’s.
 
Hmmm how you worded this article about being low cost computer and compared it to iPad.. it made me wonder if they doing it to take some heat off them for not making the iPad more useful
 
"A thinner enclosure isn't entirely out of the question if Apple cuts features to reduce costs, but at the same time, reducing size leads to lower battery life, and Apple probably wants to have decent battery to compete with or outmatch cheap Windows laptops.

Since the MacBook Air can run fine with an M-series chip and no fan in an enclosure that's 0.44 inches thick, there's no real reason for the MacBook to be any thicker than that, unless Apple wants to add a bigger battery."

Max thickness of the 12" MacBook is .52" with average thickness .30. So I'd be OK with .44" but that is crazy overkill. If they just took out the Intel processor from the 12" MacBook and replaced it with A18, it would likely get over 15 hours of battery life. What the heck are they going to do with all the extra volume?

On top of that, to fit a 13" or so screen, the length and width will also have to grow (no that much) but adding even more volume.

But make it any thickness Apple wants, but please get the weight down to around 2 pounds like the 12" MacBook. When the M1 Air came out, I bought one, but returned it the next day. Going up to 2.7 pounds may not sound like much, but picking up and moving my laptop maybe dozens of times per day at home and out turns out to be a huge lifestyle change. Even with a slightly larger screen, it should be an easy design problem to keep it down to 2 pounds or even less as you can have a smaller battery and still get world beating battery life versus anything else approaching that weight (other than an iPad).

An interesting analysis with a lot of context to consider. Thanks.

I'm not immediately interested in this because I'm on a collision course with a 14" M5 Pro MacBook Pro purchase pretty much as soon as it gets released but I am wondering whether, as well as price, making this rumoured A-Series MacBook as thin and light as Apple can possibly make it while achieving whatever battery life goal Apple sets for it might be quite an important consideration.

Anyone buying this as their only MacBook would not, I would have thought, object to it being super thin and light (subject to that sufficient-battery-life caveat mentioned above) but if Apple can also create a sufficiently wide gap in portability between it and the 14" MacBook Pro (let alone 16") then just maybe that could allow it to address an addition market of MacBook Pro owners who might consider a second laptop whereas beforehand they wouldn't.

If someone has a MacBook Pro mostly used as their desktop PC and taken on overnight business trips when they might still need to do demanding work that might well be all they need and they might find it difficult to justify the price tag of an iPad Air as a second laptop just as a slightly lighter grab-and-go device when they need some fresh air and want to sit in the park or a coffee shop and catch up on emails and other light work. Sure, there are other options apart from MacBook to do that park or coffee-shop computing, iPad (or iPad + keyboard for people who really want the keyboard) but for people who do want to stay in the MacOS world for their working day then just maybe the lower price point of this rumoured A-Series MacBook vs a MacBook Air might open up the door for a new group of dual-MacBook owners who can't quite justify the price of a MacBook Air as a second laptop.

Like I said up top, I'm not immediately interested because of my planned M5 Pro MacBook Pro purchase but I wouldn't 100% rule out this rumoured A-Series MacBook ending up tempting me into dual-laptop ownership as contemplated above whereas I definitely would not consider being a MacBook Air + MacBook Pro owner.
 
Come on apple, bring it! Will get one from Amazon with 15-20% off 🤩

(So I can retire my 2017 12” MacBook)
 
It’s one of those things where like, yeah, the target user of this isnt going to need it
…which is the entire point. If you’re not the target user, Apple would rather you bought a higher-end Mac.

every thunderbolt dock/accessory works with every mac
Which has only ever been “kinda-sorta” true, and then largely because Mac was the main market for TB devices. Even though most devices “work” there are plenty of caveats regarding things like display support.

Also, a lot of modern TB 4/5 devices (and even TB3 devices with newer TB controllers) can now fall back to USB 3 or DisplayPort if they’re plugged into a non-TB USB-C port.

One of the snags with the old 12” was that it was about the first laptop to use USB-C, so there were very few compatible devices, and TB 1, TB 2 and first-gen TB 3 devices didn’t have USB 3 fallback (unless the manufacturer added a separate USB port).
 
Would be good if it has more than 8GB RAM. If priced well, it will easily sell in huge numbers. The chip will be powerful enough. Waiting to see this MacBook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.