Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually, that would be vice-versa. Sony would probably need to be more openly willing versus just Apple here.
They clearly are, given that LDAC is supported on every Android device.

It's just Apple not licensing codecs like apt-x and LDAC. The hardware is there, it's entirely possible to enable with an update, Apple just needs to play nice.
 
As long as they still support Bluetooth too, having an extended connection mode would not be so bad.

Logitech has their own wireless connection for mice that is far better than Bluetooth. If Apple did create an extended wireless protocol, they might be able to submit it To the bluetooth group as a proposal for a next gen protocol.
True, I just wouldn’t want to know the price for this product, and given the price of the airpod max, this would be even more of a niche product, but, bring it on…
 
As long as they still support Bluetooth too, having an extended connection mode would not be so bad.

Logitech has their own wireless connection for mice that is far better than Bluetooth. If Apple did create an extended wireless protocol, they might be able to submit it To the bluetooth group as a proposal for a next gen protocol.
I wonder if Apple has considered licensing Logitech’s wireless protocol, or maybe collaborating with them.
 
Actually, that would be vice-versa. Sony would probably need to be more openly willing versus just Apple here.
They clearly are, given that LDAC is supported on every Android device.

It's just Apple not licensing codecs like apt-x and LDAC. The hardware is there, it's entirely possible to enable with an update, Apple just needs to play nice.

I agree, the problem isn't Sony, it's Apple when you can find LDAC on inexpensive (relative to Sony's) earbuds from companies like Soundcore.

 
I'm so glad I don't have that curse! I literally can't tell the difference between a 128kbps mp3 and the original CD track, at least not on anything I listen to it on. I guess if I had some super fancy hi-fi system I might, but I'm not into that.
It's fairly easy to recognise, the sound of a snare drum for instance is much more distinguished.
 
Also moving from a tap to a squeeze was an utterly stupid decision. I used to have no issues running and tapping my AirPods, now I have never been successful at skipping a track without then having to reposition the Airpod while running. I hate the squeeze to do something change and I hope they go back to a tap.
“Hey Siri, skip”?

I actually liked the tap as well, but I conditioned myself to only tap VERY lightly. Also, it gave you more options depending on how many times you tapped. Now, I mainly use voice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SRLMJ23
YES. YES. YES. One of the best features of the iPhone from the beginning was using my phone in live sound environments where quick & convenient bumper music or aux tracks are needed. In these situation bluetooth is simply not a convenient or reliable option, or even available most of the time. Having to keep a dongle hanging on the end of input cables or on the end of my phone all night has been major bummer.
But if you have the cables what’s the big deal keeping an adaptor on one? Also Major Bummer {salutes}
 
Bye bye Android compatibility.
They don't need to give up android/bluetooth compatibility—because legacy iOS devices would go with it.

My guess is Apple is developing something like UWB LE (low-energy). Ultra-wide-band solves a whole host of those problems. It has much more bandwidth (7-10mb/s) and it would handle head tracking and spacial positioning a lot better (cm vs m for positioning accuracy). Many Apple devices already have a U1 chip. Apple just needs to develop a U2 chip that fits UWB in a ear-bud style enclosure with BLE style power draw—and of course downloads unasked for albums into your Music library.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.