64GB of storage is just fine for me. I'm not a senior (yet) and I'm pretty tech savvy
what are you storing on your phone that you need to offload content? if you were more tech savvy maybe you wouldn't be storing so much stuff on your phone?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Base 128GB iPhone Storage Tier Needs to Go
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
64GB of storage is just fine for me. I'm not a senior (yet) and I'm pretty tech savvy
what are you storing on your phone that you need to offload content? if you were more tech savvy maybe you wouldn't be storing so much stuff on your phone?
OK, I can see plex downloads, YouTube downloads and roms et.c. taking up a lot of space indeed.
Honestly, I think Spotify and Netflix saves me a ton of space. I have more than 12 000 photos and videos captured on my phone, plus all the apps I need, with room to spare. Still haven't had to offload anything. That's on a 128 GB base model... The only time I actually download something for offline viewing is when I'm going on a flight with no internet access, in which case I bring the iPad anyway so tend to download to that instead.
Don't get me wrong, money no object I would take a 1TB phone but I really haven't had much trouble with 128GB.
Also... one can back up their iPhone photos to their Mac with a USB cable, for free. No iCloud account necessary.
I think this still works with iTunes on Windows too
I get why some people defend 128GB storage—it works for their needs. But what doesn’t make sense is Apple’s pricing. At the premium they charge, 256GB should be the starting point. Just because you don’t need more storage doesn’t mean Apple isn’t being greedy.
I’m not saying they should scrap 128GB entirely, but it should be reserved for entry-level models. They won’t do that, though—pushing people toward cloud storage subscriptions is too profitable.
Meanwhile, Apple is charging nearly $1 per GB for MacBook storage upgrades. MacOS took a hit in 2024, iOS is trending downward, and yet they’re still inflating storage prices instead of expanding their market. You can’t overcharge for something so basic and expect long-term growth.
I’m not saying they should scrap 128GB entirely, but it should be reserved for entry-level models. They won’t do that, though—pushing people toward cloud storage subscriptions is too profitable.
Meanwhile, Apple is charging nearly $1 per GB for MacBook storage upgrades. MacOS took a hit in 2024, iOS is trending downward, and yet they’re still inflating storage prices instead of expanding their market. You can’t overcharge for something so basic and expect long-term growth.
Tim Crook will continue giving users as little as he can in order to maximize profits for as long as he can get away with it.
For Windows users, yes, iTunes for Windows is still available & still do backups.
But you still need a 3rd party app to transfer any other files off the iPhone to the PC, which is still unfortunately frustrating.
"backed-up information includes text messages, notes, call history, contact favourites, sound settings, widget settings and more. In addition, photos in Camera Roll or Saved Photos are also backed up. Other media files (such as songs, videos and some photos) aren’t backed up, but can be restored by syncing with iTunes."
Back up your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch in iTunes on PC
In iTunes on PC, back up your device to your computer. You can then restore your device if you have any problems.
Last edited:
it’s not about defending apple but realistically what can you actually do
I'm all for more storage, but only if it doesn't bring a price increase. As plenty of others mentioned, the problem lies with the exorbitant prices Apple charges for upgrades. 128GB is plenty for anything I'm ever going to do on iOS, so I wouldn't want to be saddled with paying more because other people need more storage (like if, say, Apple eliminated the 128GB price tier, leaving the 256GB option as the new base). That said, I sympathize because I could always use more storage on macOS if it were priced reasonably.
How about lowering prices instead? Instead of starting at 256GB for the same price - make the 128GB models a little bit cheaper.
I haven't had 128 GB of storage since the iPhone 7 was new. I've had 256 GB ever since. At one point in time, I had only about 40 GB remaining.
Game accounts and photos to upload to Instagram took much of the storage.
Game accounts and photos to upload to Instagram took much of the storage.
Beautifully said and most don’t seem to notice or care.
Except for reducing prices of the previous generation models by $100 a year for two years, Apple tends to rely on the carriers to do the price lowering/discounts. For example, you can get a new 128GB iPhone 16 Plus from AT&T right now for $395.64 ($10.99/month for 36 months). Yes, it requires an AT&T plan but that's how things were when the iPhone originally launched.
Other carriers may have "better" deals. Boost Mobile offers a new 128GB iPhone 16 Pro for $0.00 with an Infinite Access plan.
LMAO. 128 GB is more than enough for most users.
However, there is nothing stopping Apple from giving users more than that other than pure greed. It costs them nothing to add more storage, but allows them to price gouge users for the upgrade.
However, there is nothing stopping Apple from giving users more than that other than pure greed. It costs them nothing to add more storage, but allows them to price gouge users for the upgrade.
I don't need more storage. I want my valuable data stored in the cloud, not just on a device that could be lost, stolen, or broken at any moment. iPhone is just a viewfinder for my data, amongst many.
No, this is easily solved by paying more money or changing brand.
I don't need a lot of local storage and I would prefer a small amount of storage instead of Apple increasing both prices and storage.
Again, can easily be solved by spending around $20 per year. You're not entitled to a single byte of storage.
I store everything at home, not the cloud
why would anybody walk around with a full resolution photo library in their pocket?
The 128 GB iPhone Pro is the perfect example of this. It can’t even use one of the flagship “pro” features (ProRes video recording).
I’m using about 90GB of my 256, and yes I do subscribe to the top tier iCloud storage, but having more storage on my phone wouldn’t change that. The iCloud storage is what synchronizes all my devices and lets me access files anywhere. Storing everything on my phone wouldn’t help that at all.
Now if I shot video, then yeah, the more storage the better. But that’s really the only use case I would see. The only reason that I have 256 is because that’s the base for the Pro Max phones. I could easily recover tens of gigs by offloading unused apps, reviewing large attachments, and deleting old iMessage threads, etc, but I’m lazy and don’t care 🤷♂️
I dunno, I think it’s going to vary widely by user, and honestly everything should have more storage, wether it gets used or not
Now if I shot video, then yeah, the more storage the better. But that’s really the only use case I would see. The only reason that I have 256 is because that’s the base for the Pro Max phones. I could easily recover tens of gigs by offloading unused apps, reviewing large attachments, and deleting old iMessage threads, etc, but I’m lazy and don’t care 🤷♂️
I dunno, I think it’s going to vary widely by user, and honestly everything should have more storage, wether it gets used or not
From where I'm sitting as a Mac user in 2025: 64 gigabytes of iPhone storage, and 5 gigabytes of free iCloud storage, are still totally serviceable.
Yes, they should.
Companies should bundle as little as possible and charge for extras and services unless the cost is minuscule.
The reason is that's by bundling you put the pricing mechanism of the free market out of work.
I think you're missing the point of capitalism and a free market.
If something "would enormously benefit a lot of users" those users should pay enormously to get that benefit. But they're lucky, since Apple only charges a few hundred dollars. And the competitors charge even less.
I'm using less than 50Gb.
If you use iCloud Photo Library and iCloud Drive, most regular users don't need a huge amount of local storage.
All these people want is to save money. That's not Apple's job.