There's way too much jumping-to-conclusions here.
From the marketing copy it seems as if these are LSD cells. Manufacturer? Who knows. Only when they start getting in the hands of users will we really know.
Quality of the charger is a big issue. Is it a high quality charger? Does it use dV termination, or dT? Is each cell charged on a separate circuit or are they handled as a pair? Most cheaper chargers handle batteries in pairs, so a 2-cell charger only has one charging circuit (assuming that you use them in pairs and that they are identical enough, so they each only need equal amounts of charging). But a high quality charger charges each battery independently of the others in order to give each cell optimum charge. Again we'll have to wait until users get their hands on the charger to see exactly how it operates.
The one thing I do like about this charger though is that it seems pretty compact, and might make for a good travel charger. If it proves to be of reasonably good quality, I could see where it would be nice to have a good quality (like a Maha or a LaCrosse) charger at home, and then for trips bring along this very compact charger which will (hopefully) still do a pretty good job of charging, but will save you space when you don't need advanced recycle/refresh/reporting type of charging on the road. Would be cool to see a 4-cell version but if you typically only use your batteries in pairs it would be a great bringalong charger.
P.S. I think Apple's claims of "10 times better than the average" is a bit far fetched. Consider that a fully charged NiMH is uaually around 1.42V terminal voltage. My LaCrosse BC700 trickles about 15-20 mA per cell once the charging is complete. Power equals amps times volts (P=IV) so the wattage of a 1.42V cell charged at say 17 mA is ~24 mW. Multiply by 2 (although the BC700 can do 4 cells the Apple charger only does 2) and it's ~50 mW. So in reality the Apple charger is about half the trickle charge of what is considered to be a good charger. I guess a cheap low quality one has the possibility to draw a lot higher idle current, but compared to my BC700 it's not really a significant improvement.
P.P.S. Will this also charge AAAs?
Ruahrc
From the marketing copy it seems as if these are LSD cells. Manufacturer? Who knows. Only when they start getting in the hands of users will we really know.
Quality of the charger is a big issue. Is it a high quality charger? Does it use dV termination, or dT? Is each cell charged on a separate circuit or are they handled as a pair? Most cheaper chargers handle batteries in pairs, so a 2-cell charger only has one charging circuit (assuming that you use them in pairs and that they are identical enough, so they each only need equal amounts of charging). But a high quality charger charges each battery independently of the others in order to give each cell optimum charge. Again we'll have to wait until users get their hands on the charger to see exactly how it operates.
The one thing I do like about this charger though is that it seems pretty compact, and might make for a good travel charger. If it proves to be of reasonably good quality, I could see where it would be nice to have a good quality (like a Maha or a LaCrosse) charger at home, and then for trips bring along this very compact charger which will (hopefully) still do a pretty good job of charging, but will save you space when you don't need advanced recycle/refresh/reporting type of charging on the road. Would be cool to see a 4-cell version but if you typically only use your batteries in pairs it would be a great bringalong charger.
P.S. I think Apple's claims of "10 times better than the average" is a bit far fetched. Consider that a fully charged NiMH is uaually around 1.42V terminal voltage. My LaCrosse BC700 trickles about 15-20 mA per cell once the charging is complete. Power equals amps times volts (P=IV) so the wattage of a 1.42V cell charged at say 17 mA is ~24 mW. Multiply by 2 (although the BC700 can do 4 cells the Apple charger only does 2) and it's ~50 mW. So in reality the Apple charger is about half the trickle charge of what is considered to be a good charger. I guess a cheap low quality one has the possibility to draw a lot higher idle current, but compared to my BC700 it's not really a significant improvement.
P.P.S. Will this also charge AAAs?
Ruahrc