Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
But if Apple sold me a USB 4 capable mac who's drivers limited it to USB 3 then later updated it to support USB 4 and all the while was still selling USB 3 limited machines with the same product designation... it would get confusing and frustrating.... that's what most people complaining are experiencing. Frustration and confusion... and that is no one elses fault other than Apple. They control the narrative for their products. If their explanation or justification is insufficient to remedy confusion and frustration well... then they need to change it until it does... or just kiss that part of their business goodbye, as eventually customers will either grow tired/cynical or competitors will capitalize and snatch up market share at the earliest opportunity.

Exactly and per Apple, the 4th generation iPad Pro does NOT support anything more than 4K


  • Video mirroring and video out support: Up to 4K through USB-C Digital AV Multiport Adapter and USB-C VGA Multiport Adapter (adapters sold separately)


This would piss people off trying to plug a 2020 iPad pro into any of Apple's shipping monitors.
 
Dear Craig, can we have MacOS on the Pro iPads please instead of this stage manager? Why do we still not have Apple Pro Apps on Pro iPads?

Also: does the superfast unified memory on M1 allow for a calculator app on iPad or will this be an M2 exclusive?
 
He forgot to mention that iPad sales are in the gutter. Technically, even if what he says is true, they could probably have gotten away with 3 virtual workspaces instead of 4 on older iPads. 2018+ iPads are plenty fast.

Personally, the more I think about it, the less I like the idea of not utilizing a big chunk of my screen real estate just to switch between apps. Most people I know don’t swap between groups of apps, either, which stage manager seems to have been optimized for… like virtual desktops.
No. iPad sales are not “in the gutter.” They were the only product line not to see an increase last quarter but they blamed supply chain issues, not demand.
 
Yes, because putting windows to the side is such a monumental task for modern Apple chips. This is just forcing people to upgrade for no reason.
They haven’t taken away the existing features. iPadOS has several new features for iPads with the A12 series chips.
 
Dear Craig, can we have MacOS on the Pro iPads please instead of this stage manager? Why do we still not have Apple Pro Apps on Pro iPads?

Also: does the superfast unified memory on M1 allow for a calculator app on iPad or will this be an M2 exclusive?
PCalc is available for $10.
 
"Because it forces customers to upgrade"

That's why. And we all know it. lol

Yes, exactly.

Except arguably no one's "forced" to upgrade. People's ipads behave exactly as it did as when they bought it.


Do people have a right to be salty about it? sure they do.
Will people vote with their wallet? no because there's no alternatives and apple knows it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marshall73
Somehow I doubt we'll find any more agreement with Craig's latest.
Well, he didn't really add anything to the previous statement. He's only saying the same thing, that stage manager requires more RAM and faster SSD that can only be provided by the M1, and his claim was simply that previous gen iPads cannot provide the required performance.

But then an intel macbook air can do it. So... M1 and its fancy speeds are not actually required then.
 
Well, he didn't really add anything to the previous statement. He's only saying the same thing, that stage manager requires more RAM and faster SSD that can only be provided by the M1, and his claim was simply that previous gen iPads cannot provide the required performance.

But then an intel macbook air can do it. So... M1 and its fancy speeds are not actually required then.
Which is ironic, because Apple skimps on RAM in their iOS devices like no other company. Turns out RAM actually IS important, regardless of how efficient the OS may be.
 
Which is ironic, because Apple skimps on RAM in their iOS devices like no other company. Turns out RAM actually IS important, regardless of how efficient the OS may be.
Probably intentional. I mean this is a company that keeps selling a $1500 laptop with just 8GB of RAM. It's probably by design, to prematurely outdate the device when the OS and software are requiring more RAM for normal operation.

I was actually fine with it if Apple just stayed quiet. We know Apple tends to just screw older device here and there, and we know it's their strategy to nudge people to upgrade. Can't help it. But Apple coming out with a statement with technical BS made it so laughable. They opened the can of worms themselves.
 
"Because it forces customers to upgrade"

That's why. And we all know it. lol
Obviously, and people would've shrugged it off if Apple hadn't said anything. But they came out with technical BS excuse that drew more scrutiny now. Such a blunder. Apple needs to look for better marketing people.
 
Obviously, and people would've shrugged it off if Apple hadn't said anything. But they came out with technical BS excuse that drew more scrutiny now. Such a blunder. Apple needs to look for better marketing people.
The day you will have created a trillion dollar company is the day you will be allowed to criticise Apple's Marketing!
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: yabeweb
Why is this being dragged on? It sounds fishy.

"The power of the M1 chip ensures that all apps being used in Stage Manager are "instantaneously responsive."

How about instead of running multiple apps. Can you let us run a few apps using "Stage Manager" on my iPad Pro which does not have the M1 Chip? Instead of four apps… let me run two apps, please. I know it’s doable and the iPad without the M1 Chip can handle it.
Supporting all of that comes at a cost. Apple pays for that with less dev time available for this, and other new features. We pay for it, with a higher chance of buggy software all round. In software engineering, you have to prioritise - you can't do it all.
 
Obviously, and people would've shrugged it off if Apple hadn't said anything. But they came out with technical BS excuse that drew more scrutiny now. Such a blunder. Apple needs to look for better marketing people.
Their marketing is somewhat competent. It is their post launch communications when trying to explain their dubious actions which fails on a regular basis. It is very poor and incredibly amateurish for such a resource rich company. As it seems to often come from Craig, it may be a case that he is permitted to wing it without being forced to follow a script devised by comms experts. Similar to Cook being afraid or unwilling to control Jon Ive.
 
Its utter BS and selfish to use this tactic to force people to upgrade from a nearly new iPad at a time when the entire world is struggling financially.

If the A12Z is capable of running full Mac OS on the dev Mac minis 2 years ago, the latest iPad mini can run this feature.
The Dev kits from 2 years ago had additional 16GB of RAM, not just the 4 or 6GB of RAM on the A12Z SoC itself.
 
It's plausible that the M1 iPads are the only ones that can run this multitasking interface without excessive battery drain and getting warm/hot. The question is, should Apple be architecting core new software features that will only work with the current model they're selling?

I guess the answer depends on whether you have an iPad with an M1 chip.
If Apple doesn't introduce new features to take advantage of new hardware capabilities, we'd never get new features.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iOS Geek
No explanation in the world is going to satisfy everyone with this one. Sorry, Craig. As for me I could care less for not having it. My iPad use has been reducing steadily ever since M1 came out. Only use my awesome mini 6 for bedtime reading now. Won’t miss this feature.
How much less could you care? A lot?
 
I find it funny how angry everyone is for not getting Stage Manager.
I am sure once it's actually out people will realise that it's utterly useless for anything but the very biggest of iPad as the app they know and love is now running at 50% screen real estate.
And even then I bet a lot of people will go back to using apps fullscreen instead of having app icons and minimized app screenshots all over the place.
 
Well, he didn't really add anything to the previous statement. He's only saying the same thing, that stage manager requires more RAM and faster SSD that can only be provided by the M1, and his claim was simply that previous gen iPads cannot provide the required performance.

But then an intel macbook air can do it. So... M1 and its fancy speeds are not actually required then.

But Intel MacBook Air have alot more RAM than iPads and swap on top of it.

Only the latest iPads have 8GB RAM as a minimum.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: calstanford
I was ready to call BS, but to be fair, you know those Apple Developer Transition Kids that cost $500? They had an A12Z chip inside a Mac mini enclosure, but they had 16GB of RAM and I'm not sure how the 512GB SSD compares to the A12Z iPad (4th gen 12.9" Pro), but that iPad had only 6GB of RAM. Doing a quick search I think the last new Mac that had less than 8GB of RAM was the low-end MacBook Air from 2015. So yeah, if Apple is wanting to move forward with these as they say, then perhaps we can expect some enhancements or expansions of Stage Manager on the M1 and newer iPads in the coming years. Perhaps they wanted to have a more solid base to build upon for advanced computing iPads, and from there the iPads will fall off in support over time like they always do years down the road. But they had to make a decision to fragment the OS for more advanced systems.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they meant to launch this update alongside the M1 iPad Pro last year. As Apple has stated themselves, the hardware teams work with the software teams to design chips to support what software wants to do and they plan things out years in advance. My guess is that the pandemic threw off the software team and they couldn't keep up with Apple's world class hardware team. There were so many rumors of an advanced multitasking mode coming to iPadOS last year, and then there were some stories that it got pushed off because they couldn't meet deadlines. I bet they were planning to release iPad Pro with M1 at WWDC and say that only it would support the new Stage Manager, but since they couldn't get it done in time and since the iPad hardware was ready, they went ahead and released it a little over a month before WWDC 21. They probably made that call in the late autumn or early winter to focus on improving the existing multitasking experience and polishing up some things and start ramping up iPad Pro M1 production. And I bet M1 was less affected by the pandemic than work by other teams because it had a longer lead time since it was their first desktop-class chip and destined for the Macs and they probably had a lot of work done on it earlier on as a major effort within the company to make this transition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marshall73
You bought it anyway, used it every day, were happy with it.
I was never happy with my iPad and I use it about every three months. Every time I want to use it I need to first charge it.
Then I sign some document with the Apple Pencil which I also need to charge first.
And then I remember that this is a really capable computer, but I can't do any programming on it.
 
Having the beta and stage manager on my 12.9 Pro, I tried it, don’t like it and don’t use it. Is it cool? Kinda. Would it be good on an external display? Probably. I just use my iPad in hand or with the Magic Keyboard and I don’t use apps side by side very often so don’t care for my apps in smaller windows. I just don’t think many users will miss it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greezeg
This is indeed what I was also thinking. The M1 iPad Pro will be the basis of what will get Mac features like Stage Manager and Swap from now on.

Problem nowadays is, developers are now still focused on making apps for very weak iPads with low RAM and we will never get quality apps this way that can make use of M1.

And Apple is probably facing the same issue. They can move Mac features to the iPad, but it is pain to make many different versions of it so that it works also on weak iPads with low RAM. So they just made a cut off from which iPad will get Mac features from now on.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.