This board must not use facts cuz they banned InfoWars from a fake news report.
Apple either needs to ban "share to Facebook" on news apps, or they should block access to Facebook for 30 minutes after opening a news app.
This board must not use facts cuz they banned InfoWars from a fake news report.
Not really. When you’ve been in Marketing long enough you’ll realised that it’s not jut about the initial income you’ll get from something, you start to see things in a bigger picture, how does the picture look like as it progress further. Similar to this, sure they will earn commission for every apps, initially but without reviewing the app thoroughly and they missed out on something that could affect their brand in the future and could lead to a PR madness, lawsuit, it could cost them more than how much they’ve earning from it. Especially with apps now, you don’t know if information they pull out from you and cross sharing it to other apps for target advertising. So might as well, fix it before it even begins or cut itSo let's get this straight... The man in charge of deciding whether an app stays or goes, or deciding what changes need to be made to an app, is the VP of marketing. Can anyone say conflict of interest? That makes no sense at all.
I don’t work for Apple but I’d love to get a basket of fruits lolI have an app under review right at the moment. Who do I send a basket of fruit to, to help my review get approved?
How is that a “conflict of interest?” What are the two conflicting interests?So let's get this straight... The man in charge of deciding whether an app stays or goes, or deciding what changes need to be made to an app, is the VP of marketing. Can anyone say conflict of interest? That makes no sense at all.
Macrumors has reported on how Facebook and Uber got secret api’s that passed the review board in the past, so it is obvious that this Board does give special treatment to certain companies. See https://www.macrumors.com/2017/10/05/uber-removing-apple-granted-api/.
So, this executive review board determines what apps can be downloaded to my phone instead of me. Why can’t I have the decision on what apps to download off the internet? Does Apple think consumers can’t decide for themselves? If there was a completing App Store on the iPhone or the option to download apps off the internet, this Board would have to loosen its grip.
This board must not use facts cuz they banned InfoWars from a fake news report.
I'm always amused by those who pick Infowars of all things as their hill to die on.
How is that a “conflict of interest?” What are the two conflicting interests?
Man that's a lot of apps to review per day. Quality must drop at that review speed?
What? It's Apple's App Store. They decide whether an app stays or goes on their platform. It is of the interest to Apple to make sure there are no bad apps on the App Store. App Store was never meant to be completely fair. Just fair enough to attract a lot of developers.So let's get this straight... The man in charge of deciding whether an app stays or goes, or deciding what changes need to be made to an app, is the VP of marketing. Can anyone say conflict of interest? That makes no sense at all.
I am NO fan of Phil Schiller. He has ate one (or 100 or so) too many hot dogs. Never been impressed. It's my personal opinion not based on anything or this Apple Review Board ... but I think he and Eddie Cue's time has come and gone and are holding Apple back.So let's get this straight... The man in charge of deciding whether an app stays or goes, or deciding what changes need to be made to an app, is the VP of marketing. Can anyone say conflict of interest? That makes no sense at all.
So let's get this straight... The man in charge of deciding whether an app stays or goes, or deciding what changes need to be made to an app, is the VP of marketing. Can anyone say conflict of interest? That makes no sense at all.
No.That explains how/why Apple crippled the Steam Link app, despite it effectively just being a remote desktop client. The fact that the client I use intentionally disables features on my PC (and that Apple thinks they have any ethical right to dictate that) is outrageous.
Anyone else feel like this story wasn’t really much of a story? I mean it’s nothing like the exposés on Facebook’s content moderators.
If you want to read a real exposé, read this: https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/19/...-interviews-video-trauma-ptsd-cognizant-tampa
Schill, is an disgusting anti democratic person. As all the apple leadership. App Store is a joke, hopefully gets broken up soon.
Well in fact idc apple has become one of the most disgusting companies for me!
Why not just leave every app in and give a rating? What’s so difficult being a sane human being? People who wanna go with a(pple) rating only get shown this apps, done!
No we need censorship and a process and rules!