.... he was ultimately fired last December so that Apple could avoid paying him restricted stock that had been awarded in 2008, not because of any issues with his job performance.
A conversation...?
At least where I live, that's simply not legally binding. Where I live, yes, you can enter a so called verbal contract, but then you need to present everything in a certain formal manner, have agreement from both parties, and have a recording on file.
Nothing new here. I can't tell you how many times I've seen people terminated, released or laid off just months away from retirement so the company doesn't have to pay. It's not unusual at all....especially in these difficult economic times when the job market is bad....companies abuse their employees, take benefits away, reduce pay, don't give raises, extend working hours.
It all changes when times are good again and the job market turns prosperous. That's when they start being nice....offering good pay, benefits, good hours....and start having a company policy of "family values" and "employee wellbeing".....
Then it will eventually change as times get tough....and they'll take all that stuff away...again abusing folks "because they can"....
It's a vicious cycle.....and a fact of life. Just gotta live through the bad times so you can enjoy the good times, rather than using the good times to recover from the bad times.
Better call Saul.
In California, verbal agreements carry the same force as written contracts, but of course proving that there indeed was a verbal agreement and that there is not simply a misunderstanding is more difficult than with signed contracts.A conversation...?
At least where I live, that's simply not legally binding. Where I live, yes, you can enter a so called verbal contract, but then you need to present everything in a certain formal manner, have agreement from both parties, and have a recording on file.
Sucks that they screwed him like that, but unless he has something in writing on something on tape I can't imagine this is going anywhere.
Just another reason why I am firm in my desire to stay in the wonderful world of small business.
I suspect he does have it in writing, video or voice recording, etc. Otherwise his lawyer would not have been likely to take the suite.
This is just a stunt to get some more money out of Apple. I hope he gets Lionel Hutz to represent him, because this is the most blatant case of wrongful termination, I can almost picture it... "Will I always have a job here Steve?" Steve- "Yes, over my dead body would anyone fire you!"
Verbal contracts are legally binding. It's not the guys fault Jobs died. And a company like that would have it down somewhere. This guy wouldn't make such a case against Apple if he didn't have something substantial to base it on.
Nice to see the fanboys taking the side of the company and blast the guy who.. You know.. Made the keynotes announcing all of the greatest products ever. At least give the benefit of the doubt. Jobs would never have an idiot in the upper echelons.
If I'm wrong, fine.
No one should ever promise lifetime job security, no one. If this did happen it is darn near impossible to prove now and I would be surprised if the CEO of a company would say something like that.