Why are they so behind here?
Because they spend all their time inventing greedy rules for the App Store.
Why are they so behind here?
Hopefully users will be given a choice as to whether they will permit their data and queries to be fielded by cloud-based AI.They are developing very capable multimodal smaller models that will probably answer 75% of all of your queries, and parter to outside vendors for the rest. Remember, apple business model is privacy based, so they will try to keep it local until they can, after this point, they will tokenize a index of part of your data if needed for the outside inference.
Ahem...Apple just launched its own LLM, but MacRumors journalists seem to have no idea about it.
View attachment 2361341
Zero carbon footprint is typically isolated to specific products and manufacturing materials, and not used to describe basic operational areas. iCloud itself violates any zero carbon claim. The packaging for a MacBook Air on the other hand... no company on the planet will ever be 100% zero carbon footprint, but the efforts are what really counts in this day and age. I'd rather applaud those attempting to make a different rather than pick them apart.Can Apple like, avoid cloud-based AI? They can't say "Yay earth! Yay zero carbon footprint!" and partner with servers that demand so much energy and cooling water.
It's very disappointing that they need to do this. If this happens, I hope it's only temporary, like a decade or two or three, before Apple catches up. But of course by then other companies will have full fledge iron man suits, and Apple will be pushing their Vision Pro 15, Apple bikes, Apple walking sticks. It's just sad that's all.I thought Apple was developing their own AI. Looks like all they are going to do is partner with another company.
Why are they so behind here?
We're thrilled to present the father nature, you are gonna love it.Can Apple like, avoid cloud-based AI? They can't say "Yay earth! Yay zero carbon footprint!" and partner with servers that demand so much energy and cooling water.
Because Apple's beloved CEO prefer to go to Oscar's instead of really invest on those things. Yes, apple vision are a great start product, but competitors are far away from them in AI.I thought Apple was developing their own AI. Looks like all they are going to do is partner with another company.
Why are they so behind here?
Agree. The original move to Intel processors allowed them to put out good products while Apple Silicon became a reality. Now everyone else is rushing to compete. Same in many categories. They called em crazy when they did away with CD/DVD readers and said adios to optical drives. All the nay sayers here and other places going insane stating "streaming will never be a thing." Now look at the world. Predicting Apple will shake the paradigm once again by not "keeping up" or "catching up", but rather by approaching in a way no one knew they wanted.. until we saw "one more thing"Apple is not known for moving into new areas quickly. They wait to see what the market is asking for but AI is moving so quickly that that approach is going to leave them behind. That said, many things are niche until Apple makes them mainstream so once this is added, it’s going to really change things. People like to say “AI” but most dont know what to do about it. They will later this year it seems.
"Net-zero". Their goal is to counterbalance their carbon footprint with energy and resource-saving practices. They will look for ways to step it up.Can Apple like, avoid cloud-based AI? They can't say "Yay earth! Yay zero carbon footprint!" and partner with servers that demand so much energy and cooling water.
Googles customer service is so bad though compared to Apple.OpenAI and Google worked on their models for many years, employing the top researchers in the field, and applying tons of RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback — which takes time and large amounts of human feedback). Apple can’t just catch up that quickly for generative AI.
Look at how long Apple took to catch up on Google Maps with Apple Maps. And most people still think Google Maps is better in most countries.
Apple chase not a better world or a better product, but the almighty dollar and this is how they wasted $10B and didn't release a compelling vehicle.Oops, imagine if Apple had spent $10 billion dollars on beating Google in AI rather than beating Tesla in autonomous EVs?
LOL, they would have still lost.
I actually think that is what is in the talks, but also forked off on a Private cloud with a clone of the model, and have it secure and not subject to the google scanningApple should waive the default search engine royalties and use Google’s AI tech instead.
Which is what happens when your CEO can only see into the next quarter.OpenAI and Google worked on their models for many years, employing the top researchers in the field, and applying tons of RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback — which takes time and large amounts of human feedback). Apple can’t just catch up that quickly for generative AI.
Look at how long Apple took to catch up on Google Maps with Apple Maps. And most people still think Google Maps is better in most countries.
I thought Apple was developing their own AI. Looks like all they are going to do is partner with another company.
Why are they so behind here?
And it seems like Apple can only do 1 thing well, so that also means that while Apple focuses on AI, every other non-AI software product will languish even more, with more bugs (if that is even possible).While I’m confident Apple will do a good job with this project, it may be dead last in the competition based on apples lethargic development history. 🤷♂️
Can Apple like, avoid cloud-based AI? They can't say "Yay earth! Yay zero carbon footprint!" and partner with servers that demand so much energy and cooling water.