I am never short of amazement of all the advocacy of abandoning what is a clearly better connector and port for a mobile device. USB-C is far more prone to wear, breaking and contamination.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Lightning Port is Nearing Its Expiration Date, So What's Next for the iPhone?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Clickbait title
Should do wonders for the tens of thousands of folks who were promised wireless CarPlay from Apple/car manufacturers but never got it. ??♂️
Uh… MagSafe is a tiny metal disc that’s stuck to the back of your phone, you can still use the phone while holding it.
Even with the duo, you can fold the Apple Watch portion into itself and hold the phone while it’s charging.
It’s magnetic, remember? It sticks
Originally, I didn't mind the Lightning connector as it was, in many ways, superior to the micro-usb that was the alternative at the time. Now, with USB-C there is no reason for it to exist other than to make Apple money with the MFi licensing.
Last edited:
Apple should do a lot of things but they are only going to do what makes them the most money or saves them the most costs: As longs as there's no clear indication that Apple is losing market shares because of it's refusal to go USB-C for iPhones then there's no reason for them to change anything and waste money on R&D.
Giving iPhones USB-C renders a ton of proprietary, made by Apple-accessories obsolete and opens up the market for consumers to get cables and chargers that are neither made by nor mfi certified by Apple.
Judging by what Apple is doing with MagSafe, I feel its much more likely they'll rely on some iteration of that or come up with yet another new proprietary solution. Equally likely is a portless iPhone with upgraded wireless charging speeds, "MagSafe 2nd Gen" or something similar.
Businesses only care to impress as long as it means increased profits. If consumers buy the product even when parts of it are disappointing then there's no reason for the business to change the product.
I'm also sure that there are just as many Apple users on the other side of the fence who have invested hundred of dollars on Lightning accessories and would hate to see the port go.
The win that many are painting a switch to USB-C to be for Apple isn't as obvious as it's often made out to be.
I hope so, I think if Apple removed the port completely, there would be unprecedented backlash against the changes.
I imagine a MagSafe-like port (like the ones on Macs). Never imagined absolutely no port. Who knows.
For iPhone, I would say, after lighting comes wireless.
My iPhone 13 Pro Max is already wireless. I charge my iPhone overnight on a NOMAD wireless charger and data transfer is AirDrop.
The only wired connection I have is AirPods Max connected with the lightning to 3.5mm cord to play "lossless".
My iPhone 13 Pro Max is already wireless. I charge my iPhone overnight on a NOMAD wireless charger and data transfer is AirDrop.
The only wired connection I have is AirPods Max connected with the lightning to 3.5mm cord to play "lossless".
I've had USB C port phones for over 6 years and never had any issues!
I really hope the 14 isn’t when we get the portless iphone… I want to buy one last up to date model before I stop buying iPhones altogether
Yes, I know but if your holding the iPhone for 30 minutes to a hour, having a disk on the back is just not comfortable
I suppose battery life is now at the point where it doesn’t need to be charging all the time so it won’t matter regardless of this change
Apple can start using USB-C without taking its head out of its ass.
Some serious click-baiting with that headline. The lightning port does not have an "expiration date".
If you add the stationary computers, you get two more.
1. Lightning
2. USB-C
3. Mac Mini power connector
4. iMac/Mac Pro power connector
5. iPhone Magsafe
6. Apple watch charger
#1 should be replaced by #2, and I personally hope #3 gets replaced by #4 due to a new form factor.
Edit: Based on comments:
7. MBP Magsafe
8. Beats USB-Micro
Last edited:
USB-C is stupid:
- thick
- faster charging speeds
- faster data speeds than the trusted 20+ year standard USB 2.0
- people can make the cables without Apple profiting
- it’s not Lightning
- Apple makes less money
- I give less money to Apple
Stupid! give me back my 30-pin connector.
- thick
- faster charging speeds
- faster data speeds than the trusted 20+ year standard USB 2.0
- people can make the cables without Apple profiting
- it’s not Lightning
- Apple makes less money
- I give less money to Apple
Stupid! give me back my 30-pin connector.
We're taking that comment 10 years ago as a literal expiration date? Slow news day?
Article does suggest MagSafe to include data in a future version. So instead of an USB-A->Lightning cable you will need an USB-A->puck cable.
It does seem that Apple just don't want me to replace my Xr for the next 2-3 years. Fine with me....
There is also different MagSafe for iPhone/MacBook Pro so should 7
"the company believes the adoption of USB-C would negatively impact its Made for iPhone (MFi) program"
Aka.. we would lose money from licensing
Aka.. we would lose money from licensing
Five years ago we were told that mobile phones would be obsolete -- in five years. Replaced by something ah, um, wonderful. Yeah, its a slow news day. ?
I am under the impression there aren’t enough pins to handle the bandwidth; It’s a limitation of the plug.
Otherwise Apple woulda done this years ago, right? I can’t imagine anyone at apple wants USB 2.0 on their flagship phones.
I get this impression Apple will go with their own MagSafe variant for the iPhone, probably one that is also capable of data transfer. I understand why people want "a single cable to charge everything", but since the Watch already has its own cable, I really don't see an issue with carrying a third option when traveling. It's not really that big a deal.
No skin off my nose, as I am happy with my current range of devices (and specifically, the Lightning Docks I have all over the house to dock my phone).
No skin off my nose, as I am happy with my current range of devices (and specifically, the Lightning Docks I have all over the house to dock my phone).
For iPhone charging I much prefer Lightning. It's a far more robust connector.
Really. Such a vulgar comment.
For iPhones I much prefer Lightning.
Really. Such a vulgar comment.
For iPhones I much prefer Lightning.
I know but I oftentimes use my iPhone for over an hour at a time and having a disk on the back is just not the same as having the cable plugged in under the iPhone
Battery life continues to improve each year with both hardware and software optimizations and is probably now at the point where I don’t need to be charging it all the time so it might not matter to me if Apple gets rid of the lightning port on their future iPhones