Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If it comes with a 8 cores M2, it will be extremely disappointing! Wasn’t it supposed to come with a M1X (with more cores)?
Let’s hope it isn’t the M2
 
  • Like
Reactions: Queru and bklement
This is super early! Btw, I don’t believe it’s a M2, it’s just like a M1X for the MBP 16”, 14” and maybe iMac pro. Maybe 12 cores? This chip must support more than 16gb of ram and more than one 6k monitor.
Probably you are correct, there are references to new processors in Big Sur 11.4 beta 1.

Usually new codes for cpus are added to beta patches when the release of the cpu is planned to be around the time of release of the beta software.The beta cycle for MacOs patches is about two months, so June 2021 may be the time for new machines, with new more powerful M1 variants (WWDC 😃). M2 seems to early ... but who knows
 
Before school starts would be neat, but with the iMac and iPad Pro not coming until late May, that might be too tight.
 
That was quick, I was expecting M2 next year and the M1X this year? I wonder what the core count and GPU will be?

MacBook Pro for Oct then and maybe the fabled 30+" iMac.
Apple will probably carry on selling M1 Macs as 'Entry level', M2 will possibly be for the new MacBook Pro's and iMac Pro? Perhaps there will be no M1X at all?

Edit: I like how I am being negged because I speculated on a rumour...on a rumours site lol
 
Last edited:
Extremetech had an interesting article, about how Apple uses ONE chip for everything, from the cheapest MacMini to a rather expensive iMac. And what that means for Intel, which makes money by providing many, many different chips, and PC makers who differentiate by using different chips.

With that in mind, I started thinking that maybe releasing a chip with 8 performance cores now, then another one with 12 or 16 cores later, may not really make sense. If Apple goes straight from 4+4 cores to 12+4 cores, with doubled GPU cores, and the on-chip memory just as a giant cache with more external RAM, that would be very interesting. An M2 chip would then be equivalent to 18 Intel cores. So you would have the choice between either an M1 chip for "low-end" Macs that works just fine (and better than quad core Intel chips), or an M2 which blows every Intel chip out of the water, except for the most expensive Mac Pros. And nothing in between. So nothing for people who say "I want something a bit faster". Either "M1 is just fine for me" or "I really want all the performance that I can get".

(12+4 cores and not 12+12 because more than 4 power savings cores don't make sense to me. The amount of on-chip RAM would be interesting; if you have 64GB outside the chip, the choice between 8GB or 16GB on chip would be only for performance because there is little difference between a total 72GB or a total 80GB, and 8GB might give you most of the performance gains).

Apple will probably carry on selling M1 Macs as 'Entry level', M2 will possibly be for the new MacBook Pro's and iMac Pro? Perhaps there will be no M1X at all?
The M1 Macs _are_ "entry level". They are just astonishingly fast "entry level" computers, which confuses many people. Now the existing machines all make sense. I'd think that every line except maybe the MBA will gain an M2-based model. What I would find interesting is whether Apple would build the 27" iMac (probably upgraded to 30") with an M1 at all, or only with the more powerful M2.

So: MacMini - choice of M1 or M2. MBA - only M1, because it is only entry level. MBP - M1 or M2. iMac 24" ??? iMac 27/30" ???

And of course nobody knows what Apple will call the chips. They could call them all M1. And next year's chips, whether 4 or 8 or 12 cores would be M2, and M3 the year after that and M10 in 2030.
 
Last edited:
A few possibilities:
  • despite the name, this chip isn't as low-end as the M1 was, and adds features like four (say) monitors, four Thunderbolt ports, and eGPU support (I'm not sure if this one is even a hardware limitation or simply a software feature waiting to be ported). Meanwhile, the current M1 Macs stay on the M1 for a while, and perhaps move downward in price, slightly.
  • the rumor is slightly inaccurate/incomplete, in that the real story is that this is a whole family of M2 CPUs, e.g. M2L, M2, M2X.
 
This naming is confusing though?
If this M2 would be used in higher end iMacs, higher end Macbook Pros and lower end Mac Pros.... I would assume M3 which would launch in 2022 would be even more powerful, thus being designed for higher end Mac Pros (and maybe re-introduction of iMac Pro).

What would then an updated version of Macbook Air use? Or Mac Mini? Lower end Macbook Pros? Lower end iMacs? Everything that currently uses M1 basically?
 
The M1 is great but it was always my plan to wait for 2nd gen. I guess it’s just a habit. I like to let others test it out and wait for the tech to mature. Doesn’t seem to be any need for that with Apple Silicon but whatever. Also, my PC is still quite capable so in no rush to upgrade it but I am ready to come “Back to Mac” after 9 years away.

I’m hoping we get a 27+ inch iMac with an M2 in it. If for whatever reason that doesn’t seem like a good choice I would probably want a 16 inch MacBook Pro.
 
If the processors are ready in sufficient amounts in July, why do you think they would sit on them until October? This is not a rhetorical question, maybe there's something here I haven't thought about.
July is the earliest the first run of M2 would go out. They still need to be soldered on to the motherboard which needs to be installed in the housing. Then sufficient quantities have to build up for the preordering period.

It will be October , not late summer.
 
Is eGPU support confirmed? Was hoping for this but haven't seen it mentioned yet.
No.

Either they haven't gotten around to implementing it on ARM, or they are waiting for a hardware component that isn't on the M1, or they aren't planning to do it at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V.K.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.