Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I used to be in the market.... a long time ago.... Lost almost everything and had to go back to work. I still invest but not in the market (at least not directly). If I did however, I would think this is not the time to buy Apple. I would certainly have either bought them already and be thinking on selling now and taking out some profits or I would wait for the stock to dip so I can buy at a low(er) point.

Still thier 18:1 ratio is very reasonable.

Rule 1: Don't try to time the market.
 
I think the expectations are too high now. That's not a good sign for the stock in the near term. Meanwhile, Apple needs to focus on fixing all those software and services issues with iOS 8/iCloud etc.
 
GOoo apple.. I picked up a ton of shares back when in split, but had to sell because the money is meant for a new home purchase.. we made off with a $4700 gain.. not bad at all.. eat that Apple haters.

The split was a chance for the normal people to make money. Everyone who can afford to buy a share, and does not do it, is a fool.
 
No, the company's value does not drop as the result of a buyback, at least not in anything but the most abstract way. Cash held on the books is not reflected in a company's stock price. Neither is any other asset, or debt for that matter. What buybacks actually do is concentrate reported earnings on fewer shares.

FWIW, Apple has repurchased around 8% of its outstanding shares over the last few years, so arguably the current price of the stock was increased by that much due to the increase in EPS. This is the direct result of buying back shares and is why shareholders like buybacks.

Of course the total value of the company drops. Not in the sense that it makes Apple a worse company, or a worse investment, but in the sense that money that once was owned by Apple is not owned by Apple anymore.

Of course if you do something stupid like HP, buying a company for 8 billion or so and then find out it's worth only 2 billion, that's 6 billion down the drain, and because the number of share holders stayed the same, each share is worth less. In the case of Apple, if they spend 6 billion on a share buyback, there are fewer share holders afterwards and each share is worth the same as before, but the company is still worth 6bn less.
 
It's called financial engineering. SJ was always against it.
The buyback was put in place to stop the sliding stock price:
http://appleinsider.com/articles/14...ises-with-massive-17-billion-q4-stock-buyback

Company value can be defined in different terms, EV, FM or market cap, depending on the argument you're trying to make.

Apple's spending billions of it's huge cash horde to drive up the share price, which in turn increases market cap. Share price increases without bolstering buyback programs represents investor confidence in future earnings, ie. P/E ratio. That confidence was low in Q1 results in Jan '14, hence the massive increase in buyback.

Apple is rich and successful beyond anything, but the point to ponder is, will it continue on this track. Future earnings GROWTH is what props up share prices and without a buyback program, it is currently doubtful that investors alone would sustain or push the current price higher.

It's kind of a victim of its own success, as Wall St sets expectations ever higher, you would have to believe that gross margins stay where they are and that sales are increasing. Except for the iPhone, that's currently not the case, iPad sales growth is declining.

Present value of future earnings divided by the number of share is what supposedly the current stock price represents (forgetting all the financial engineering, dividends and whatnot that can occur to manipulate things). If future earnings just track inflation. The stock price would also track inflation.

The bigger the current stock price * shares compared to current earnings, the higher the expected growth in earnings is. This is were the guessing games reside. How big will that growth be?

That's theory. In practice, since the mid 1990s, earnings and stock price seem to have gotten a divorce in the case of many tech companies ;-). So much so that it all looks a lot more like gambling than anything else. Otherwise, Amazon's valuation (and many other tech firms), makes no sense at all.

When a company gets larger and saturates its market (this always happens eventually for a big company). The company future earnings grow just a bit faster than inflation. Then, a company becomes a blue chip and no longer a growth stock.

This isn't bad per say, unless you want a high rate of return. Apple, will reach such a plateau eventually. Its a good thing. Much better than having collapsing earnings and an ever shrinking company. This has happened to many major companies in the past.
 
It is a joke that never gets old because there are so many pundits out there who never get tired of somehow spinning Apple's success as the surest sign that it is about to fail. The Macalope over at MacWorld roasts those pundits on a regular basis, so I know that this is not an exaggeration. Oh, and last night I caught an article all on my own basically explaining why this was bad news.

To be fair, eventually AAPL will be overbought. Although that's bad for the stock, not the company itself.
 
All you stockholders can thank me - I bought some April 95 calls for $8 2 months ago and sold them at $15 a month ago after the stock paused at about 110. Those calls are now worth $25. Nice gain, but man is it painful to watch what I don't own double in a month.... I do have common still, but that 10% gain feels like peanuts (spoiled, I know).
 
Of course the total value of the company drops. Not in the sense that it makes Apple a worse company, or a worse investment, but in the sense that money that once was owned by Apple is not owned by Apple anymore.

Of course if you do something stupid like HP, buying a company for 8 billion or so and then find out it's worth only 2 billion, that's 6 billion down the drain, and because the number of share holders stayed the same, each share is worth less. In the case of Apple, if they spend 6 billion on a share buyback, there are fewer share holders afterwards and each share is worth the same as before, but the company is still worth 6bn less.

The total value does not drop, at least not in market terms. Assets are not available to ordinary investors unless the company decides to make them available through dividends or buybacks. Otherwise, those assets might as well be on the moon. Equity investors own a share of earnings. That is all they own unless they buy all of the equity and thus own the entire company. At that point and only at that point would they have access to company's assets (and would assume its debt too).

Mergers, especially when they involve stock swapping, are totally different animals.
 
I own a pretty good chunk of apple that I am debating selling soon. I have two chunks of shares actually, the first of which has already been held over a year therefore now is in long term gains tax bracket. The second larger chunk I would like to hold on until at least February so it too becomes long term instead of short term (IE, earnings taxed much less). I believe with the iPhone 6 and plus doing so well the market will hold on, but I'm getting nervous.

This stock is all about the iPhone. I bought it back in the pre-split ~$400 range due to suspected larger iPhones eventually showing up, and the consumers gobbling them up. The upgrade cycle has been insane to say the least. However, once it is over, I see a LOT of potential room for this stock to fall. I saw a statistic that something like 6 other stocks have had a market cap over 600 billion before, and nearly all of them are now worth ~1/3 of that. The Smartphone market eventually WILL mature, and once the larger screen switch is through I think the iPhone may very well enter into more of an iPad like upgrade cycle. Hardware wise, the 6 plus is essentially doing everything I'd like in a phone, and at this point it becomes more about the software. I just think Apple are going to have a hard time convincing the majority of people to keep upgrading a device like the 6 plus every two years.
 
And yet their selling more products than they ever have before. How is that possible?

Bubble. Apple followed Samsung lead on inflating their cell phone sales by upping the screen size.
I own a pretty good chunk of apple that I am debating selling soon. I have two chunks of shares actually, the first of which has already been held over a year therefore now is in long term gains tax bracket. The second larger chunk I would like to hold on until at least February so it too becomes long term instead of short term (IE, earnings taxed much less). I believe with the iPhone 6 and plus doing so well the market will hold on, but I'm getting nervous.

This stock is all about the iPhone. I bought it back in the pre-split ~$400 range due to suspected larger iPhones eventually showing up, and the consumers gobbling them up. The upgrade cycle has been insane to say the least. However, once it is over, I see a LOT of potential room for this stock to fall. I saw a statistic that something like 6 other stocks have had a market cap over 600 billion before, and nearly all of them are now worth ~1/3 of that. The Smartphone market eventually WILL mature, and once the larger screen switch is through I think the iPhone may very well enter into more of an iPad like upgrade cycle. Hardware wise, the 6 plus is essentially doing everything I'd like in a phone, and at this point it becomes more about the software. I just think Apple are going to have a hard time convincing the majority of people to keep upgrading a device like the 6 plus every two years.
agreed. I think 2 years from now we will see a drop in sales domestically. China might help global sales increasing tho.
 
To be fair, eventually AAPL will be overbought.

Don't tell anyone here that ;)

Thankfully that means that those of us who can separate a good investment from a company that we are fans of can make a ton of money after it goes back down again.
 
and yet their recent offerings have been getting less and less reliable...

the stock market will auto correct in a few years, so probably best to sell now
 
I believe they are the first company to ever hit $700 billion market capitalization. I would say that "is doing something."

Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I thought Microsoft topped $800B in ~2000?

Edit: I am mistaken, you are correct. Microsoft hit their high of $620B in December 1999.
 
When Apple's stock price is low, and when their profits are less than the year before, people say its a sign of failure.

When Apple are doing well financially, people say 'money isn't everything, it's good products that matter.' Apple can't win.
 
All you stockholders can thank me - I bought some April 95 calls for $8 2 months ago and sold them at $15 a month ago after the stock paused at about 110. Those calls are now worth $25. Nice gain, but man is it painful to watch what I don't own double in a month.... I do have common still, but that 10% gain feels like peanuts (spoiled, I know).

Woulda
Coulda
Shoulda

is a recipe for me buying stock in acid indigestion relief makers. You doubled your money (or near...) Congratulations! Think how bad the people that bought puts at $95 2 months ago feel.

----------

Bubble. Apple followed Samsung lead on inflating their cell phone sales by upping the screen size.

agreed. I think 2 years from now we will see a drop in sales domestically. China might help global sales increasing tho.

P/E ~ 18:1 means they're slightly overpriced to me. I prefer to have companies at the 16:1 range.

However, they can raise their earnings, too... :D
 
Not bad for a company 'doomed to failure' after Steve Jobs died. ;):D:eek::cool::apple:

Pretty sucky for a company who can't get their **** together. How bout spending some cash to make sure they don't release updates that needs to be recalled the next day and installing quality RAM among a gazillion other things.

Deep organization issues with iCloud? Try spending some cash to fix that too. Oh and the mess that is iTunes.
 
Apple is rich and successful beyond anything, but the point to ponder is, will it continue on this track. Future earnings GROWTH is what props up share prices and without a buyback program, it is currently doubtful that investors alone would sustain or push the current price higher.

It's kind of a victim of its own success, as Wall St sets expectations ever higher, you would have to believe that gross margins stay where they are and that sales are increasing. Except for the iPhone, that's currently not the case, iPad sales growth is declining.

Who else in the mobile market would you rather invest in?

There are only 3 smartphone manufacturers actually making money: Apple, Samsung and LG.

The sad thing is... there are 63 smartphone manufacturers around the world.

Samsung is losing profits and losing sales (they're having trouble selling their #1 product, the Galaxy S5...)

And does LG have anything in the pipeline that will radically increase their growth?

So that leaves Apple... who is currently increasing profits and increasing sales... and has been doing so for years.

Will Apple keep growing forever? Probably not... no company can grow forever.

And that leads us back to my original question: who else would you invest in?
 
All their recent fails:

iOS 8 problems
Yosemite problems
Not enough iPhones
Mac mini RAM nit being upgradeable
iCloud photo library
No Apple TV update
No new MacBook Air
No refresh on regular iMacs

The stock market is crazy.

Hmm, I didn't see anything like that hurting Microsoft in the late 90's. This is business, not mindshare among those who want everything to be bug free. And yes, I'm very disappointed in those things...however, if problems with software and disappointments in hardware for tech people controlled the stock market, Google would be a penny stock.
 
Market Cap doesn't really mean anything. It's just the total number of outstanding shares X the value of the share.

Some people say it's what the company is worth to investors. And this is wrong too... the company's worth is the total of all its assets at any point in time.

But whatever... if we're just talking numbers... I'm long BABA!!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.