Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not very compact design. It will take up space of 2-3 power sockets. Having the prongs on the shorter design would of been a more practical design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001 and minik
Do these chargers work with travel adaptors? I live in Japan but often travel to the UK. So if I bought a charger in Japan, travelled to the UK, and plugged it’s two Japanese prongs into my Japan/UK (3-prong) adapter, would it work?
 
Do these chargers work with travel adaptors? I live in Japan but often travel to the UK. So if I bought a charger in Japan, travelled to the UK, and plugged it’s two Japanese prongs into my Japan/UK (3-prong) adapter, would it work?
The non-compact adapter is compatible with adapters like Apple's kit. They take the same adapters as the usual MacBook chargers do.
 
Sorry, but $59 is a rip-off for a 35w charger in 2022, especially when everything is moving to USB-C charging. Wasn’t the big complaint that Apple’s walled garden of connectors was stifling innovation and inflating costs? Now we are expected to swoon over an underpowered, overpriced commodity device (which they also intentionally stopped supplying with their phones)?
No. Since Apple’s using USB-C you are expected to buy whatever USB-C charger you like. If one suffers from nullumaluphobia, this one is an option. :)
 
You guys have switches on the outlet. I think that's pretty cool and safe. Other than the outlet being huge it does seem to be better.
I mean, it seems well designed, but, as engineering is about trade-offs, I’d say they just made different trades, not that it’s better.
 
The non compact one should be 60+ watts. Charging a MBA and something else on 35W will just be painfully slow.
 
I can see people using this for business travel, where space is at a premium. I’d love to take this with me to charge my MacBook Pro on the road. I typically only need to charge it at night, so I don’t need fast charging. I also don’t particularly enjoy carrying around giant, 96 watt power bricks in my luggage.
Stop, you're making too much sense. I'm thinking about getting it for travel but to charge my iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch. Now I can charge iPad and iPhone from the same plug? Sign me up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: julesme
sadly that’s true. some gotta have it cause apple made it. instead of not buying it and making a point so apple stops this ridiculous habit, they feed them cash.
 
sadly that’s true. some gotta have it cause apple made it. instead of not buying it and making a point so apple stops this ridiculous habit, they feed them cash.
Yeah, but you’re talking about folks that like Apple’s products. Expecting folks that like Apple products to NOT buy Apple products is like expecting someone that likes to drink to NOT take advantage of an open bar. :) Fortunately, the vast majority of the 6 billion folks in the world have never and will never own an Apple product.
 
Yeah, but you’re talking about folks that like Apple’s products. Expecting folks that like Apple products to NOT buy Apple products is like expecting someone that likes to drink to NOT take advantage of an open bar. :) Fortunately, the vast majority of the 6 billion folks in the world have never and will never own an Apple product.
Don’t get me wrong.. i’ve had iphones and ipads for ages. but when i need a case or an adapter or cable, I am not going with apple stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
Sorry, but $59 is a rip-off for a 35w charger in 2022, especially when everything is moving to USB-C charging. Wasn’t the big complaint that Apple’s walled garden of connectors was stifling innovation and inflating costs? Now we are expected to swoon over an underpowered, overpriced commodity device (which they also intentionally stopped supplying with their phones)?

Nobody’s asking anyone to swoon over anything. Apple releases a new charging accessory, that’s all there is to it. No need to sound like you have been living in the matrix all this while and have only just woken up.
 
yawn. Another overpriced apple accessory. 60 bux for a dual usb c charger which on average exists for 1/2 that price. But why??!
You have to consider the point of view of a lay consumer and the market situation. For example, in my country, there are so many fake and dangerous chargers everywhere. Zero accountability for manufacturers and sellers as there are no consumer protection. A concerned lay consumer might feel better to just buy a first party charger, even if it's more expensive. Better peace of mind, and in the bigger scheme of things, it's a small percentage of the price of a Macbook itself.
 
Sure it will. The wattage would be split. It's not for fast charging. That's what the 67 watt charger is for.
So why didn’t they make it 40W so you could fast charge, say, an Apple Watch and iPhone at the same time? That seems like the obvious use case…
 
  • Like
Reactions: kerr
Stop, you're making too much sense. I'm thinking about getting it for travel but to charge my iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch. Now I can charge iPad and iPhone from the same plug? Sign me up.
But why wouldn’t you buy a much cheaper third party 40W charger that could actually fast charge both devices at the same time??
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.