coolfactor
macrumors G3
“As part of its environmental efforts”? Tim Cook is hostile to the environment in order to maximize profits, which is why literally all Macs don’t have user-upgradable memory nor user-upgradable storage anymore. Cook did that so customers’ Macs would become obsolete sooner, and thus they will have to purchase another new Mac sooner. That creates e-waste. E-waste is not “environmental efforts,” and is in fact anti-environmental efforts.
If you want to explore that possibility, fine. But to conclude that they sit around a table trying to build in "planned obsolescence", you're blinded to the truth.
There is indirect obsolescence — yes — but only as a side-effect of the "appliance-like" design approach.
Making machines that are upgradable, and then maybe only 10% of people actually take advantage of that, is far LESS environmentally friendly.
Making machines that last for a decade with minimal maintenance costs, and can then be deconstructed for parts, is a good design.
Apple has robots that disassemble iPhones to recover parts. You can drop off any old electronics — for free — at Apple stores.
Spin it any way you want, but the old thinking of user-upgradable devices is just that — old thinking.
