I believe apple prefers notebook.Is laptop vs notebook a generation thing? I always called it a laptop.
I believe apple prefers notebook.Is laptop vs notebook a generation thing? I always called it a laptop.
Is laptop vs notebook a generation thing? I always called it a laptop.
I’d love to grab a new machine with Apple Silicone but my job requires Windows only apps so I bought the most recent MacBook Air with an Intel i7, 16 GB of RAM of a 256 GB SSD. I could probably accomplish all my Windows related tasks by connecting to the VPN and using RDP to work in my desktop at the office but if a client calls and I’m working with no Internet I’d be SOL in certain situations. Things happen but man oh man would I love a new Mac with Apple silicon. Hopefully Microsoft nails Windows on ARM x64 and are smart enough to offer retail licenses to users who want to BOD. I’d buy a Mac with Apple Silicone tomorrow if Microsoft does it.
The calculation is simple enough. If you're looking to spend £850+* on a new laptop, and are not tied to Windows for any reason, what else are you going to go for (assuming making an informed choice)? Nothing comes close at the moment.
* Cost of base MacBook Air from Apple refurb.
I convinced my mom to get a MBA in January and it's very nice! I am waiting to see what the new Pros have for specs and pricing. It would be great if there was some kind of M2 that had a major speed improvement over M1 (still not everything runs native on M1 (to be expected) so performance is your-mileage-may-vary). I'd also love to get a new 27" iMac if the price, colors, and performance are right to replace my 2017 iMac.I haven’t pulled the trigger yet, but once the new models are announced, I will be the first in line. Very impressive hardware, seems they will last a long while for early adopters.
This. Apple have released a product line that's a no-brainer for their existing userbase to upgrade en-masse Not just the incremental upgrades they'd have been stuck with offering them by staying with intelProbably a chunk of that is macbook owners that usually hold onto a laptop for 5,6,7…maybe 10 years, have been compelled to replace their 1 or 2 year macbook. I bought a 2020 macbook pro that I planned to keep for quite a while, but maybe not….
They are. I bought an Ultrasharp display, and it was a month before it left the warehouse/factory.I heard they were having supply issues.
Hopefully Microsoft nails Windows on ARM x64 and are smart enough to offer retail licenses to users who want to BOD. I’d buy a Mac with Apple Silicone tomorrow if Microsoft does it.
When confronted with workplace IT policies insisting on Windows only, I just quit and got a different job.
Yuck, glowing Apple logos mean Intel Macs.Years later, I was happy to see a sea of glowing Apple logos in the classroom!
Or, you know, people can't afford or want to pay the luxury premium prices of Mac.I thought a lot through my years what seperates a PC from a Mac person. I think it comes down what you see your computer as. I did my fair share of tinkering with motherboards, memory and CPU’s it has its allure. Same goes for software with drivers etc. After awhile you realise that you don't want to spend your time on that, it what you produce on your machine thats important, technology should get out of the way and become invisible. My two cents.
Is laptop vs notebook a generation thing? I always called it a laptop.
Indeed, it's turning product lines tech savvy people would not really recommend into ones they would DEFINITELY recommend right away to nearly anyone. And this is just the beginning...Way to go M1 Macs! M1 has really added to MacBook Air/MacBook Pro 13-inch sales.
Imagine being so cynical that you call something like the M1 chip “too little too late”. I choose to think of it as the straw that broke Intel’s back. Now I get to watch the fallout for the next few years.I'm not sure what some of you are taking away from these numbers? But I'm honestly not that impressed. I remember at least a decade ago when there was talk of Macs finally achieving more than a 10% market share? And here we are today, bragging that they're at 8.4% for Q1 of 2021?
The reality is, Apple has never really got more than about 10% of computer users to buy their machines and that's been consistent for as long as they've produced Macs. Back in the day, Steve Jobs used to try to spin that as a good thing - with the idea that a Mac was a luxury item similar to an exotic sports car or a gourmet meal compared to McDonalds. And that's a perfectly valid argument, except you have to really produce a product that lives up to those claims of being superior.
I think at this point, it's dubious if a Mac is notably superior, vs just a personal preference for those of us who like OS X? I've been a Mac user and you could even say a "fan" since around 2001. But it's hard to get that excited about what they've put out in recent times... That "trash can" Mac Pro sure wasn't such a great value. And the price tag on the current model ensures it's not even an option for the "power user enthusiast" who would otherwise love to have one on their desk at home. These M1 Macs feel like "too little, too late" to me, considering Mac users already had to endure the whole hardware switch to Intel from Motorola and IBM CPUs, and the complete rewrite of software packages that required. Now, a move back to M1 means dual booting into Windows 10 isn't viable anymore, and like usual -- people buying into the tech now will just be funding R&D for future generations of the architecture that are much improved. At least Intel CPUs are pretty "tried and true" at this point. (And the new iMacs feel like a total gimmick. "Hey - let's sell them in a bunch of bright colors to remind people of what we did when the iMac was first released!" Know what? I don't really want to go back to all of that!)
I think based on Apple’s la[top designs from 2015 forward that they were expecting chips that intel couldn’t deliver. I think it’s pretty obvious Apple was expecting cooler running chips that used less energy than what they received.Imagine being so cynical that you call something like the M1 chip “too little too late”. I choose to think of it as the straw that broke Intel’s back. Now I get to watch the fallout for the next few years.
Says the guy who owns nothing but Apple products and probably hasn't touched a Windows 10 system since it released build 1511 (late 2015).I agree--Dell actually does still make ok looking hardware. But once you're done looking at the outside, you still have to deal with Windows on the inside, as well as all the crapware Dell insists on shipping with the machine. The "soul" of the nice looking hardware is still a tangled mess of bad software.
Windows 7 was, in my honest opinion, the last usable version of Windows. It was stable, pleasing to look at, and intuitive. Did it have all the same problems Windows has always had? Yes. But at least it was a nice UI and I only had to completely wipe and reinstall it once a year, which is less frequently than I've had to do it with other Windows versions in order to fix stubborn problems.
I keep having people assure me that Windows 10 is "so much better now", but I disagree. In my experience having to support it, it's still the same mess. It's still layers and layers of old Windows interface the further down you click. Still the same old registry problems, still the same weird crashes and errors, etc. The last thing I'd want to be right now as a business is a PC manufacturer married to Microsoft Windows. It's currently going nowhere (again, just my opinion).
The real elephant in the room is that Apple sold more iPads than ANY of those vendors sold notebooks. It’s been that way for YEARS now.So, Apple has ~0% chance to grab a higher rank in the foreseeable future, but could easily drop to a lower rank AT ANY TIME.
Intel really wasn’t able to meet there thermal and power efficiency goals. If they were, maybe we’d have seen an i5. But, that’s all water under the bridge now. They have chips that meet their expected performance while also fitting within a very efficient power envelope. And, they don’t have to put chips that perform significantly worse at the lowest end (just one less GPU).I think it goes to show what a terrible value their old low end chips and gpu’s were. People know the low end is a good deal now. Apple could have put better gpu in their low end. Also i5’s but they never bothered. Will be interesting to see how long it takes them to update them considering their track record before. Not holding my breath.