Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In a few months, when the new iPads are released, iMacs are updated, people get over the lack of legacy ports on MBP's, and a few months after that, the iPhone 8 sells like gangbusters...

...and a few months ago it was "wait until the new MacBook Pros are released".

That went well. Apple had two options: (a) produce something truly new and radical that we didn't know we wanted until we saw it or (b) update the 2015 rMBPs with Skylake, newer GPUs, USB-C/TB3 in place of the existing TB2 while retaining the existing ports which are going to be ubiquitous for years to come. Instead, they managed to find option (c) - make it thinner and lighter at the cost of performance and versatility - oh, and jack up the price.

We don't even know if/when new iMacs are going to be released - and they could turn out to be 27" non-upgradeable tablets with keyboards. The "high performance" version of the Mac Mini was dropped 2 years ago so its wishful thinking that a quad-i7 Mini will suddenly appear now. Professional users who got their Mac Pro cylinders on 3-year leases will be looking to upgrade right around about now, and there's no whisper whether they're going to be upgraded, dropped or left alone.


BTW, if you think these boards are bad, just look at some of the boards about Pixel and what an overpriced Nexus/iPhone wannabe it is.

That's because the Pixel is an overpriced iPhone wannabe, whereas the previous Nexus was a keenly-priced "Android at its best" product. The Galaxy Note 7 might have blown the iPhone 7 out of the water if it hadn't prematurely detonated. The Surface Studio would have blown the iMac out of the water if MS hadn't knobbled it with outdated innards* and the Surface Book 2 should have been out by now (both the Surface project have a "wow, that's new" factor that makes them stand out from Apple's offerings until you spot the flaws).

Relying on your competitors to mess up instead of making stand-out products? Now, that is courageous - especially as Google and Microsoft make their serious money from advertising/data mining and software respectively and can easily afford a few hardware flops.

I suspect many of the power users/pros/enthusiasts that are disappointed by the lack of a credible "desktop replacement" MacBook Pro will now be looking to Windows/Linux's greatest strength: the ability to choose, build, or have built-to-order a machine with exactly the hardware specs you want. If my MBP packs up tomorrow I'll probably switch to a custom PC on the desk (maybe Hackintoshed as a transitional measure) and a cheap ultrabook for the road.

(* although, at least, it seems to use a standard 2.5" HD and M.2 SSD combo that can be removed without pizza-cutters)
 
Last edited:
I've been brand loyal to Apple since 1988.

tl;dr I'm happy with all my Apple products, but I've lost my upgrading obsession -- either because of increased price, or non-availability, or insufficient excitement about new products. Apple needs to sort its supply out, manage customer expectations better, and give much, much, much better keynotes.

I currently own [...]
I'm in a similar situation (also an apple guy since the 80s) except my hardware is older than yours. 3 year old Mac, 2 year old iPad, 1 year old Apple TV, 6 month old iPhone, 7 year old time capsule. It all still works, and well. But if the iPad, Mac, or TC were to die, I don't think I'd replace them with Apple products (I'd just replace the Apple TV or iPhone SE with the exact same model I have now).
 
Best thing to happen might be for a lot of investors to dump stock, sink the share price so Apple can go back to innovating rather than trying to eek out profit margins by upping the price on retreads of devices with falling sales numbers...
 
Why is everyone citing this weeks old statement?
http://www.applemust.com/on-analyst-andrew-uerkwitzs-apple-fud-moment/

It's such nonsense
IMHO the only point that Apple Must missed is the "He thinks it’s like a potato, grown new each year." statement.

When I read the CNBC post, I thought more of a durian and not a potato. Like an apple, it's a fruit - interesting to look at, but with a stench that is generally unsurpassed by anything, but some people just eat it up and keep coming back for more... o_O
 
It is an interesting direction at the moment. I remember when Apple's goal was to empower everyone to be creative and fun. Products like iLife really highlighted this. Although you can still get most of the products expect iWeb and iDVD. Apple no longer seems to focus on these as much, and they no longer include them free. I know it's something small, and I am guessing only a small number of users utilized these products, but to me it showed that Apple was about empowering everyone to be creative, whether that be a Pro (Logic, Final Cut) or an average Joe.

To me Apple seems to be about maximizing their profits and creating products for pretentious people, not the user base that has supported them for years!
 
Apple is not doomed like many say. Even if iPhone/iPad disappears tomorrow (ain't gonna happen that fast), Apple will still be making BILLIONS in profit (not only revenue). That's still enough to be in a top ranking worldwide. Sure, stock could lose some value but having +$230 billion in the bank gives you a nice cushion.

If the iPhone and iPad were to disappear tomorrow, from where would you see Apple making these billions? A lot of their profit comes from iOS devices and the services that revolve around them - Apple Music, iCloud etc. If people drift away from Apple hardware, they're very likely to drift away from Apple services, too.

That's how the rot sets-in.

As for the $230bn "in the bank", the majority ($220bn) is held off-shore and would be incredibly expensive and complicated to re-patriate, looking at a tax of at least 40% not to mention other costs. Of course, it's still a huge amount, but it's not simply sitting waiting to be used.

And that's not forgetting the $95bn-ish of debt Apple has.
 
Rediculous report. Nothing new. Apple has so much value within it, its about to move into a massive new building, they have the best products in the world.

Absolutely rediculous to think they will somehow slide into nothing.
 
OMG no new MacPro!!! Apple is doomed!

At some point you all are going to have to realize we are almost at the point in time SJ told us about: world without desktop PCs. If Apple is going to focus on beefing up its cloud services, some things will have to be dropped.

If/when macOS goes mobile, Macs will be dead. You know that right?
If Apple thinks that iPads are the future then they are making a huge error
 
Here's an interning Apple situation...

I order an Apple watch band from apple (for my mother-in-law). Just got it this morning. It was the wrong one, and the wrong size, got 42mm black classic buck (worth $150). I called Apple directly to ask how to return for the correct one. The Apple person looked up their policy and said that they will send the correct one immediately, but to throw out the one I receive since it's not the correct size. I asked why they don't want me to send it back since it will only be a few dollars by USPO. They said it's not profitable to deal with the logistics of returning it.

So a $150 watch band is not cost feasible with the ~$4 cost to send it back. Anyone have a theory. To me it means the cost of the $150 watch band is actually less than $4. I guess I'll eBay it and hopefully get more than $4.
Hmmm. WTFF?!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan
Apple’s target customer has come full circle and, in turn, influenced its focus. I believe Steve Jobs always wanted his products to benefit the individual rather than specific disciplines, academia or enterprise. However, when Apple began its pursuit, most households didn’t have a need for personal computers. And early adopters weren’t able to afford Apple’s offerings. Therefore, Apple equipped their products to cater to creative trades and academia. They were essentially dismissed by Enterprise, but Apple won the hearts of creatives, academics and prosumers with hobbies. In turn, those customers preached the benefits of Apple’s products to friends and relatives as households began to find uses for a PC at home. Of course, people bought what they could afford, and what offered the most software programs. They didn’t embrace the Mac until they tired of the complexity, unreliability and maintenance of a Windows PC.

Today, Apple has achieved its original goal of being an everyday man’s computer preference. I don’t think Apple has abandoned the needs of creatives or academics. Rather, it has satisfied those needs adequately. The unfortunate result is that Apple has reduced its focus to the lowest common denominator. The products no longer have life-advancing goals in mind that differentiate Apple as something more than a consumer novelty. Instead, they are preoccupied with emojis, watchband styles and thinner this-and-that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: formerpc
This is bull.
I have been a fan of Apple for over two decades. Only recently, I have started to be disappointed in Apple. It is not me, it is them. They are a different company then they were just a few years ago.
I'm a fan and follow Apple very closely and I've noticed a change as well. It's palpable across my industry. Creative professionals feel abandoned. If I had to pinpoint the time I started noticing the change, it was when Angela Ahrendts joined Apple in May 2014. Interestingly, this was also around the time they bought Beats which was no more than a celebrity brand name that makes overpriced, low quality headphones. This is when they began a transformation into a luxury fashion company.

Since then we've got pink MacBooks that are only as fast as iPads. We've got iPad Pros that aren't really Pro unless you draw and have a $170 crappy keyboard accessory. The cost of the iPad (Pro), iPhone Plus, MacBook, and MacBook Pro have all increased. We haven't seen any updates to the Mac Pro. There has been a major focus on superfluous things such as emoji, watch bands, and $300 books. They've killed the Thunderbolt Display, and they're about to kill the AirPort and AirPort Extreme. We've got these strange designs like the iPhone battery case, the Magic Mouse that charges on the bottom, and whatever that horrendous LG monitor is that Apple is now selling. We've got downgraded functionality and piles of dongles. Meanwhile, Apple has done jack crap to improve their services and Siri AI. In the background, Apple's internal Car program has been in turmoil. I get the sense that they bet heavily on the car and now they're not sure what to do going forward aside from doing something with AR. Meanwhile, Jony Ive seems like he's checked out while he works on a bunch of outside projects and attends luxurious fashion events.

They've simply lost their way. This was inevitable. We deluded ourselves for years that it would never happen. That Apple was somehow immune or different. And in many ways they were different, and still are different. Much of that was attributable to Steve Jobs. We saw the same slow decline after he left Apple in 1985. Here are some excerpts from the history of Apple on WikiPedia that I'd like to talk about and how I see them reflected in what is happening today.

1984–91: Success with Macintosh
The first Macintosh, released in 1984, was the first mass-market personal computer featuring an integral graphical user interface and mouse.

In 1984, Apple launched the Macintosh, the first personal computer to be sold without a programming language at all.[43] Its debut was signified by "1984", a $1.5 million television commercial directed by Ridley Scott that aired during the third quarter of Super Bowl XVIII on January 22, 1984.[44] The commercial is now hailed as a watershed event for Apple's success[45] and a "masterpiece".[46][47]

I see this as the huge initial launch of the iPhone, even though the iPod could be argued as the thing that kicked off their recent success. The infamous Oscar "Hello" advertisement. It was a big deal and everyone was talking about it.

The Macintosh initially sold well, but follow-up sales were not strong[48] due to its high price and limited range of software titles. The machine's fortunes changed with the introduction of the LaserWriter, the first PostScript laser printer to be sold at a reasonable price, and PageMaker, an early desktop publishing package. It has been suggested that the combination of these three products were responsible for the creation of the desktop publishing market.[49] The Macintosh was particularly powerful in the desktop publishing market due to its advanced graphics capabilities, which had necessarily been built in to create the intuitive Macintosh GUI.

Original iPhone and subsequent development of the App Store that really made it take off.

In 1985, a power struggle developed between Jobs and CEO John Sculley, who had been hired two years earlier.[50] The Apple board of directors instructed Sculley to "contain" Jobs and limit his ability to launch expensive forays into untested products. Rather than submit to Sculley's direction, Jobs attempted to oust him from his leadership role at Apple. Sculley found out that Jobs had been attempting to organize a coup and called a board meeting at which Apple's board of directors sided with Sculley and removed Jobs from his managerial duties.[48] Jobs resigned from Apple and founded NeXT Inc. the same year.[51]

Steve Jobs passed away and Tim Cook took over.

After Jobs' departure, the Macintosh product line underwent a steady change of focus to higher price points, the so-called "high-right policy" named for the position on a chart of price vs. profits. Jobs had argued the company should produce products aimed at the consumer market and aimed for a $1000 price for the Macintosh, which they were unable to meet. Newer models selling at higher price points offered higher profit margin, and appeared to have no effect on total sales as power users snapped up every increase in power. Although some worried about pricing themselves out of the market, the high-right policy was in full force by the mid-1980s, notably due to Jean-Louis Gassée's mantra of "fifty-five or die", referring to the 55% profit margins of the Macintosh II.[52]

Apple has been positioning itself as a luxury brand since Angela Ahrendts joined in May 2014. Many products have seen higher price points and only steady improvements. Things are becoming somewhat stagnant.

This policy began to backfire in the last years of the decade as new desktop publishing programs appeared on PC clones that offered some or much of the same functionality of the Macintosh but at far lower price points. The company lost its monopoly in this market, and had already estranged many of its original consumer customer base who could no longer afford their high priced products. The Christmas season of 1989 was the first in the company's history that saw declining sales, and led to a 20% drop in Apple's stock price.[53] Gassée's objections were overruled, and he was forced from the company in 1990. Later that year, Apple introduced three lower cost models, the Macintosh Classic, Macintosh LC and Macintosh IIsi, all of which saw significant sales due to pent up demand.

I see this as the rise of Android. They saw declining sales four years after Jobs left, and Apple today is seeing it five years after he died. There was also a big drop in their stock price. Apple hasn't really brought out lower cost models yet, unless you count the iPhone SE.

In 1991, Apple introduced the PowerBook, replacing the "luggable" Macintosh Portable with a design that set the current shape for almost all modern laptops. The same year, Apple introduced System 7, a major upgrade to the operating system which added color to the interface and introduced new networking capabilities. It remained the architectural basis for the Classic Mac OS. The success of the PowerBook and other products brought increasing revenue.[50] For some time, Apple was doing incredibly well, introducing fresh new products and generating increasing profits in the process. The magazine MacAddict named the period between 1989 and 1991 as the "first golden age" of the Macintosh.[citation needed]

We may see this period with the iPhone 8 if it is a significant redesign. Or the perhaps iPad if they can actually update the software to make it better for productivity.

Apple believed the Apple II series was too expensive to produce and took away sales from the low-end Macintosh.[54] In 1990, Apple released the Macintosh LC, which featured a single expansion slot for the Apple IIe Card to help migrate Apple II users to the Macintosh platform;[54] the Apple IIe was discontinued in 1993.

1991–97: Decline, restructuring, acquisitions
See also: Timeline of the Apple II family
The Penlite was Apple's first attempt at a tablet computer. Created in 1992, the project was designed to bring the Mac OS to a touchscreen display - but was shelved in favor of the Newton.[55]
The success of Apple's lower-cost consumer models, especially the LC, also led to cannibalization of their higher priced machines. To address this, management introduced several new brands, selling largely identical machines at different price points aimed at different markets. These were the high-end Quadra, the mid-range Centris line, and the ill-fated Performa series. This led to significant market confusion, as customers did not understand the difference between models.[56]

There is confusion among consumers over different products and strange naming. This would include things like the iPad Mini 2/3/4, iPad Air/iPad Air 2/iPad Pro which all look the same. Then you've got odd naming like the iPhone SE which has the same performance as the 6s and 6s Plus. Or the Apple Watch Series 1 which isn't actually the Series 1 because that would be the Series 0.

Apple also experimented with a number of other unsuccessful consumer targeted products during the 1990s, including digital cameras, portable CD audio players, speakers, video consoles, the eWorldonline service, and TV appliances. Enormous resources were also invested in the problem-plagued Newton division based on John Sculley's unrealistic market forecasts.[citation needed] Ultimately, none of these products helped and Apple's market share and stock prices continued to slide.[citation needed]
Apple is doing something somewhat similar right now. First, we have the Apple Watch, and the jury is still out on it's long term success. But Apple doesn't report the sales numbers, so that is telling. Second, we have this car project Apple has been working on that has been floundering in the background. Third, we'll probably get something related to AR because everyone is doing it and the rumors, along with some statements from Tim Cook, seem to point to that.

The bright side is that this time Apple has tons of cash to burn though before anything serious would happen, such as the company going under. They can make stupid decisions and pay their way out of the mess to a certain extent. It just gives them more of a cushion to switch gears and pivot. However, the downside to this is you lose your most valuable resource in the process: people. It's the people at Apple that make it great. Tim Cook is right about that every time he mentions it at the end of a keynote. Losing those people is losing what heart and soul of Jobs is left at Apple. It's those people who instill that same spirit into new people who join the company. It's extremely dangerous and the thing I'm most worried about in the long-term.
 
Tim has turned Apple into a phone company and fails developing new products.It has also failed the pro market. The moto is just think thin.

With a sub-current of different colors.

Thin seems to be an OCD fixation there, and it's hobbling some of the products. I'm sure that was behind the drive to kill the Magsafe which was one of the BEST features of the MacBooks.
 
THIS.

I haven't been able to recommend Apple products to family & friends in good conscience since early this year.
I've even started looking elsewhere.

Apple cannot continue to take their customers' loyalty for granted any more. A couple of bad experiences (and there have certainly been plenty lately) and it's gone, --and almost impossible to win back.

Agreed! I unofficially support 20+ friends and family. I don't imagine many of them will stick with Apple once I'm using a Windows machine. Apple is outright hostile towards "pro" customers and has chosen to dumb everything down to the point where people like me have no choice but to jump ship.
 
For the first time in 8 years, I've been looking at PCs as an option for my next computers. What got me into macs was build quality and a rock solid OS (I started circa OS X 10.5). I was willing to forgive the higher price tags since apple's machine were significantly better in every respect to their PC counterparts. Better monitors, awesome keyboards, best trackpad in the industry, much better battery life. Well let's face it, the competition stepped up their game in recent years where now you're seeing PC offering very high resolution beautiful screen, comparable keyboards, battery life that is on par with macbooks, and a much improved OS in windows 10. And they are offering these laptops not for just $50-$100 less than macbooks, but sometimes for a $1000 less.

8 years ago, it was reasonable to pay double the price for an apple because their products was literally twice as good. But in 2016, the competition is 80-90% (and that's debatable since some machines can exceed the mac in certain metrics) as good as Apple's but the price differential is still huge. I don't know about you guys, but I'm started to be tempted by making a small sacrifice in machine quality for a huge price discount.
 
When will people stop being in denial that Apple isn't the same anymore they are all about profit and that is turning people away now. Apple was about customer service and products and they aren't doing too well in that anymore with no MacPros etc

Apple profits = MR haters say "Apple is only about profit"

Apple doesn't sell = MR haters say "Apple has become too complacent"

Doesn't matter. Apple doesn't need Internet approval. It's like Donald Trump and Brexit.
 
The same has been said about a lot of companies that are no longer with us.

Blackberry anyone?
[doublepost=1480700398][/doublepost]
For the first time in 8 years, I've been looking at PCs as an option for my next computers. What got me into macs was build quality and a rock solid OS (I started circa OS X 10.5). I was willing to forgive the higher price tags since apple's machine were significantly better in every respect to their PC counterparts. Better monitors, awesome keyboards, best trackpad in the industry, much better battery life. Well let's face it, the competition stepped up their game in recent years where now you're seeing PC offering very high resolution beautiful screen, comparable keyboards, battery life that is on par with macbooks, and a much improved OS in windows 10. And they are offering these laptops not for just $50-$100 less than macbooks, but sometimes for a $1000 less.

8 years ago, it was reasonable to pay double the price for an apple because their products was literally twice as good. But in 2016, the competition is 80-90% (and that's debatable since some machines can exceed the mac in certain metrics) as good as Apple's but the price differential is still huge. I don't know about you guys, but I'm started to be tempted by making a small sacrifice in machine quality for a huge price discount.

I wouldn't mind paying more for less hardware on the Mac side if the OS and bundled apps weren't turning into a steaming pile of... The obsession with cloud services and turning hardware into a vehicle to milk service revenue is ruining Apple. They are dumbing everything down and driving serious users away.
 
Eehh, a lot of negativity, but practically there's not an awful lot that would need to be done in order to make a lot of people happy.

1) Drop all spinning drives or make 128GB Fusion the absolute minimum on every computer. The OS running on platters is much too slow and gives a horrendous user experience, especially for people buying a (still expensive) entry level Mac. They wouldn't want to buy one again.

2) Get a consistent hardware upgrade cycle for the computers and try not to upsell. If you can't make an entry-level computer have decent real-world performance at a certain price point, then don't offer the entry-level model.

3) If you don't have any new CPU/GPU options for hardware refreshes, upgrade storage options instead, or reduce pricing a little.

4) do not remove those necessary ports from devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck
For the first time in 8 years, I've been looking at PCs as an option for my next computers. What got me into macs was build quality and a rock solid OS (I started circa OS X 10.5). I was willing to forgive the higher price tags since apple's machine were significantly better in every respect to their PC counterparts. Better monitors, awesome keyboards, best trackpad in the industry, much better battery life. Well let's face it, the competition stepped up their game in recent years where now you're seeing PC offering very high resolution beautiful screen, comparable keyboards, battery life that is on par with macbooks, and a much improved OS in windows 10. And they are offering these laptops not for just $50-$100 less than macbooks, but sometimes for a $1000 less.

8 years ago, it was reasonable to pay double the price for an apple because their products was literally twice as good. But in 2016, the competition is 80-90% (and that's debatable since some machines can exceed the mac in certain metrics) as good as Apple's but the price differential is still huge. I don't know about you guys, but I'm started to be tempted by making a small sacrifice in machine quality for a huge price discount.

I would be with you, but I am not ready to leave the Mac OS. I use Windows more the the Mac OS due to my job, but if I had to come home to that every night, I would probably dread being on the computer.

I was thinking more of making a Hackintosh. I will wait see what Apple is doing with the iMac and Mac Pro in 2017, and decide from there.
 
There is literally nothing Apple could do to stop this culture of negativity. No product will ever satisfy the incessant neediness of people who call themselves fans of the company.
FALSE, all they have to do is start making computers again. Or maybe even just give us a HINT that they will continue to make a full line of computers in the future. They REFUSE to even do that. Fear feeds upon fear, people won't spend $6000 grand on a MacPro if this is the last MacPro ever. Apple knows this, their silence speaks volumes. Based on the evidence, they are getting out of the computer business. ( if you only make one Notebook... you are Lenovo, not a full fledged computer hardware and OS company ).

We complain because we want it to get better. When the people who have been with you for DECADES start complaining.... you should listen. We didn't start using Apple products because we "hate change". I'm old enough to remember being mocked for using a MOUSE instead of MSDOS. Anybody who cares about computers know they are going the wrong direction. Microsoft is licking it's chops. They will soon be the only player and be a monopoly again.

And just like Xerox handed the future of computers to Jobs.... Tim Cook is handing it to Microsoft. Full white flag.
[doublepost=1480702063][/doublepost]
Those 'normal people' with no particular brand loyalty used to buy Nokia in years gone by.

Apple survived their close shave by engendering loyalty and evangelism in creative pros.

And now those Creative Pros are the users Apple hates the most. Nice reciprocal loyalty Timmy !!
 
FALSE, all they have to do is start making computers again. Or maybe even just give us a HINT that they will continue to make a full line of computers in the future. They REFUSE to even do that. Fear feeds upon fear, people won't spend $6000 grand on a MacPro if this is the last MacPro ever. Apple knows this, their silence speaks volumes. Based on the evidence, they are getting out of the computer business. ( if you only make one Notebook... you are Lenovo, not a full fledged computer hardware and OS company ).

We complain because we want it to get better. When the people who have been with you for DECADES start complaining.... you should listen. We didn't start using Apple products because we "hate change". I'm old enough to remember being mocked for using a MOUSE instead of MSDOS. Anybody who cares about computers know they are going the wrong direction. Microsoft is licking it's chops. They will soon be the only player and be a monopoly again.

And just like Xerox handed the future of computers to Jobs.... Tim Cook is handing it to Microsoft. Full white flag.

Don't forget Google, and eventually Amazon, probably.

One thing that you hint at is, erm, Apple Hinting at something....
Loyal Pro customers are nervous. Aperture, FCP, iWork, MBP, Displays, Netured hardware. Who wants to invest in a workstation that might be crippled by updates in 18 months? And there's no telling what's next from Apple, only clues, and those clues don't bode well so far.

If Apple came onto the level and said "this is where we're headed. This is what we're working on" and gave a road map (or at least direction) to it's loyal users then people might respond. Doubling down on secrecy is the norm now. Nobody cares about thinner, and nobody cares about cutting off legacy hardware to make thinner possible. There's no longer excitement about what Apple's going to do next like there might once have been. Just plain trepidation, and now, rather than wait for the killer blow, a great many of those loyal (20 Years) customers are just going to where the innovation in hardware is, and right now - yes - that is Microsoft.

Didn't want to have to say it, but there you go.
 
I'm in shock, total shock.

Its Phil Schiller thats the problem not Tim.
Tim needs to shake things up and get someone to do the firing / demoting for him.

Every other day its negative, apple has lost its 'sparkle' they have taken their eye off the ball and are not listening to their core fans
ie all of us, sad.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: saytheenay and Huck
I've been brand loyal to Apple since 1988.

tl;dr I'm happy with all my Apple products, but I've lost my upgrading obsession -- either because of increased price, or non-availability, or insufficient excitement about new products. Apple needs to sort its supply out, manage customer expectations better, and give much, much, much better keynotes.

I currently own

1. iMac -- one year old. Nothing to upgrade to, and nor would I want to. It's terrific. Though it was astonishing that the base model still had a spinning hard drive. Then there's the ridiculous fusion drive. I bought the one with a flash drive. It's 2016. And Apple is supposed to be a premium brand.

2. MacBook Pro (early 2015) -- one year old. Thanks in part to Brexit and the huge increases in pricing I can't justify upgrading it. Even if the new MacBooks were cheaper, it's not clear that a new keyboard (mixed reviews) and oversized trackpad are really worth upgrading to. The Touch Bar? Too early to tell. I'm sitting this one out.

3. iPad Pro 12.9 -- one year old. Nothing to upgrade to. It would be nice if it had 3D touch. But it's a pretty sweet device. Use it every day. Love it. Initial supply problems of Apple Pencil were embarrassing and didn't smack of competent leadership.

4. iPhone 7 -- couple of months old. Traded down from a 6S+ because I wanted the smaller size. Stunningly beautiful thing. Screen is phenomenal. Makes me smile every time I used it. Superb. Couldn't care less about 3.5mm port. Non existence of AirPods is embarrassing and incompetent. 6S+ was a replacement for a 6+ that got the flickering screen cancer. Zero support from Apple. Hugely unimpressed.

5. Apple Watch S0 -- 18 months old. Very happy with it, but have no desire to upgrade. For me it's basically a watch -- quite like the notifications and fitness. Will replace when it dies but not before.

6. Airport Extreme -- one year old. Solved all my home wifi problems. Why on earth are they giving up on it?
I'm happy with all my Apple products but I'm not happy with how the software and services are which is ironic because apparently people are complaining about the lack of hardware!

1. iPhone 6S Plus, stunning device! It's so stunning I didn't even think about upgrading to 7! Waiting for the 8.

2. Mac Mini 2012, it works great, Plex server, Media hub and some light Pixelmator and iWork. Waiting for a Mac Mini with quad core processor or maybe I'll jump to one of HP's new mini computers.

3. Apple TV 4, all I wanted was an AppStore, Apple delivered. There're better options unless you think about your universal apps and games.

4. MacBook 2009, just when I need a laptop which is rare. I want a shiny new MacBook even if it comes with one port, when I can afford it.

5. iPad 3rd Gen, solely an eBook reader.

6. AirPort Extreme, sigh.

7. Apple Watch Series 1, it's exactly what I want from a watch & an activity tracker.

So, the hardware is amazing as it worked for me for years, Apple knows that which is why they're not upgrading their portfolio each year.

The software is lacking tho, iOS in iPads is a disaster, macOS yearly upgrades sucks even if it's for free, iCloud? it just works sometimes!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gelatus
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.