Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Breaking: companies don’t like to spend their own money to create an advantage for their competitors. The real mistake that Apple made was announcing that iMessage would be cross-platform if they didn’t really intend to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
There's an element of echo-chamber with that though isn't there? I use it, and I use it to communicate with others that use it, therefore it must be really popular? Dunno, I've not really missed not having it on my main phone at all. I just don't think about it.

Of course there is a echo-chamber here, just like people on any other messaging app. If 'everyone' is on {x} then thats all that matters to most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacRS4
So it’s basically what we all suspected before: Apple was worried doing this would erode their market share. I mean that basically why Apple does anything they COULD do but choose not to, if we are being honest.
It sucks, but it makes business sense. God forbid Apple put overall user experience over market share, but no one should be surprised.
Can you name one company that does?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
I use AirMessage on my Samsung phone and tablet, which makes iMessage work on them 100%. Yet it is still not enough for me to completely switch over to Android.

With Apple ecosystem, Notes, Airplay, Remote, Airdrop and Apple Watch integration are still much more fluid and functional compared to the alternatives offered by Samsung's ecosystem.

However, a lot of people I know, including those with Apple devices, still use WhatsApp more than iMessage for group chats, media exchange and audio/video calls simply because of the cross platform functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
I wonder why Apple wasn’t able to replicate succes of iMessage outside the US. i guess it comes down to critical market share of iOS devices.

the idea of lock-in because of iMessage is just ridiculous were I live (Europe) because iMessage doesn’t bring anything compelling to the table that isn‘t available from other servies that are cross platform.

That brings me to the question why Apple hasn’t innovated the service for years? They could have added sooooo many great features that would actually make it unique and bring in more users. For instance screen sharing, remote iOS troubleshooting, collaborative office work, integration with other apps, etc.

but all we got were stickers and confusing mention and reply mechanisms.
 
It's too late now anyway. WhatsApp is so popular in Europe that I don't think anyone would use iMessage exclusively.
Yeah same, i have asked my gf (she is buying new phone soon) to consider iphone.

She refuses, "would never touch Apple".... Like why??????????????! Do you WANT Google to spy on you?!
I never get any answer for that question :rolleyes:
 
I will never understand how iMessage of all things locks people to iOS
It’s not even that good

Agreed. What’s App is better and more feature rich than iMessage except that it’s owned by FB so I use it as little as possible.

But I’m surely not going leave iOS for crap Android.
 
I will never understand how iMessage of all things locks people to iOS
It’s not even that good
I agree, but I think its because such a large group of people uses the apple ecosystem. FaceTime and iMessage.

I know every year I look at some of the new android phones and say to myself, that looks cool - but the first roadblock that pops into my mind is always having to drop iMessage and FaceTime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: philrock
iMessage is pretty much the only game in town in Scotland and perhaps the entire UK. The rest of the time you just use unlimited SMS messages because chances are the other person is using any number of other messengers. Thankfully iMessage automagically sends a message or SMS depending on the recipient.
Surely everybody uses WhatsApp? Otherwise if the other user hasn't got iMessage then you get stung for charges etc in sending picture messages. Anecdotal I know, but everyone I know and their families would view WhatsApp as being the only game in town.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McScooby
The most American of lock-ins, since iMessage is barely used elsewhere.

Epic should seriously consider going home, after leaving the car keys to the bartender.

I agree, and I also think apples reason for not bringing it to Android is a little flawed too. I don't think parents are buying new phones for their kids, most of the time, they are hand me downs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjohnstone
a lot of my friends using iphones, but none of us using imessages. despite having some cool feature. not able to cross platform is the main problem.
 
Imessage is not the lock in. The lock in is the ecosystem and apps and content /subscriptions. Most iPhone users I know use WhatsApp or telegram etc. I myself have lots of purchased media content in the likes of apple TV etc which i guess I'd have to give up when moving over to android.
 
I wonder why Apple wasn’t able to replicate succes of iMessage outside the US. i guess it comes down to critical market share of iOS devices.

the idea of lock-in because of iMessage is just ridiculous were I live (Europe) because iMessage doesn’t bring anything compelling to the table that isn‘t available from other servies that are cross platform.

That brings me to the question why Apple hasn’t innovated the service for years? They could have added sooooo many great features that would actually make it unique and bring in more users. For instance screen sharing, remote iOS troubleshooting, collaborative office work, integration with other apps, etc.

but all we got were stickers and confusing mention and reply mechanisms.
This is typical Apple. They sleep on their app laurels.

It’s almost as if Apple’s apps are intended as entry level proof of concept or for functional basic feature demonstration.

Messages: why lacking good features of What’s App, e.g. like received/read datestamps?

Contacts: why can’t I enter a zip code and have town and state auto-populate?

Calendar: why can’t I go back more than 2years, and am forced to go to my Mac when I do?

Notes: why can’t I have standard text editing tools?

tvOS: why can I screen mirror from my 6S but can’t airplay (IIRC used to be able to do this)?

Mail: why is the unread counter still do wonky? Why does it show new mail but not download it? (Used to do that, now I have to wait for sync to complete.).

MFi hearing aids: why is there no duplex communication possibility? My mom needs an extremely high power aid for her one good ear. Will never be able to use AirPods or the like but she gets half the experience because she has to Schlepp her phone around if on a FaceTime if her counterpart is to hear her.

FaceTime: why is it not possible to initiate a group audio chat from the start?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: NetMage
Surely everybody uses WhatsApp? Otherwise if the other user hasn't got iMessage then you get stung for charges etc in sending picture messages. Anecdotal I know, but everyone I know and their families would view WhatsApp as being the only game in town.
You can replace WhatsApp with iMessage or any other messaging app and it works the same. I have only heard of WhatsApp in this forum. Telegram, Signal, Discord, Skype, and Messages are all used to an extent with Discord being the biggest cross platform one. Messages is built into the iPhone, anyone not with a iPhone can get one for less than £30 a month or they automatically send and receive SMS messages.

iMessage is just a progressive enhancement of a SMS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
... The real mistake that Apple made was announcing that iMessage would be cross-platform if they didn’t really intend to do it.
Wasn't that just Facetime...? Could be mistaken, don't shout!

Yes, I recall FaceTime being announced as open source, which I recall that to mean a platform such as Android (or Windows ... or Linux 😁) could support video chat apps that can communicate with FaceTime on an iPhone. Not so much that Apple would create a FaceTime app for other platforms. The patent lawsuit from VirnetX killed that, I believe.

Other than the endless speculation in forums like this :), I don't think Apple has ever indicated interest in cross-platform iMessage.
 
Last edited:
Why not make it a paid app? Surely they could determine a profitable price point.
News flash: technically iMessage IS a paid app already. Anyone who wishes to use iMessages in iCloud will run out of space for messages and attachments very quickly and have to climb up the subscription tier ladder. 🤷‍♂️
 
The more I think about it I hardly use any of apple's own apps anymore as they have limited functionality and are buggy as hell. I tend to use Safari and handoff, those are the features I do like about Apple, but email and calendaring etc I tend to use google's apps for that stuff these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjohnstone
Silly argument really. A company has the right to sell and market their products and services any way they like. It’s not like there is a not a lot of other options.
And also, Apple does not need yet another service that they can be called out on for being a monopoly if a significant of Android users also adopted it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Is there something surprising here? Is Apple supposed to spend time and money to actively make it easier to buy their competitors' products?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
You have no idea how many times my kids complained that they were bullied for them being the green bubble on their "friends'" iMessages.

Apple's lockdown of this app was brilliant from a business perspective.

Their ecosystem is the ONE THING that keeps me with them, as I find Android FAR more flexible and intuitive to use than iOS.
Ok i know kids are kids and the mobile plans might wary, but are tere seriously still plans that don't have unlimeted sms? Or is it a case of animeted emojies being sent as mms eand hence costing mony, or has it nothing todo with the price of the messages?
 
Just because they say they won’t release it for android doesn’t mean they actually don’t have a working prototype. :cool:
 
Surely if Apple were to bring iMessage to other platforms such as Android and Windows, wouldn't that attract anti-competitive complaints from the likes of Facebook and other message providers who would probably struggle to attract users on those platforms? Mind you, looking at how Apple Music and iCloud services are implemented on Windows and Android, I don't think Spotify and Microsoft's OneDrive (and similar) has much to worry about!

I think the important thing here is that Apple isn't limiting or excluding the likes of regular SMS and other messaging services on the iOS/macOS platform. Personally, I find myself using WhatsApp far more than iMessage despite being an iPhone user for goodness knows how many years.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.