Even iPhone users don't use iMessage in Europe. Even if you and your friend have iPhones you'd still use WhatsApp.It's too late now anyway. WhatsApp is so popular in Europe that I don't think anyone would use iMessage exclusively.
Even iPhone users don't use iMessage in Europe. Even if you and your friend have iPhones you'd still use WhatsApp.It's too late now anyway. WhatsApp is so popular in Europe that I don't think anyone would use iMessage exclusively.
Honestly, I forgot that even existed, because it seems so rare. However I will expect (and I don't know for sure) that it is a lesser version than version in a GM vehicle as it is not likely integrated into the ECU. Also, that only will work on an old vehicle...as newer one have all kinds of safety/tech stuff built into their mirrors and therefor can't be changed and therefore, not compatible. I guess that point is, as a company, you want to create a distant product that nobody else can get unless you buy their product. That is what innovation and capitalism is all about.....and copyright/patent. Now I have this distinct product and you can't do the same, without inventing your own. My Subaru has "StarLink", Subaru's equivalent, however it is not comparable with the GM OnStar. Are we going to get to the point where governments are going to say that they all need to be compatible? So it I have an OnStar subscription and I get a Subaru, I have to cancel one product and get another. That was mainly my point. I think you need to look at the ecosystem around the product you buy, before you buy it and make sure it has a things that you want. That is why I use Apple products for everything, the ecosystem of iOS, MacOS, watch, etc.Except you can get OnStar in non-GM vehicles... OnStar saw a demand and created a product called OnStar FMV.
You can retro fit almost any car with it.![]()
Companies will create products for a market if they see a profit potential.
Apple doesn't see that with iMessage. Which is fine and perfectly legal.
They could make it a subscription based service, but it's been surpassed by other free clients with regards to features, so there really wouldn't be any compelling reason for someone to pay for an inferior product.
Apple Music costs money. Messages would just be resource drain on Apple and it would also mean integrating with an Android store so people can buy sticker packs and the like. Why would Apple go to all that effort and then the hassle of trying to make Android phones automatic route SMS to and from it in all their various forms, all for no income.Apple: "We don't put iMessage on android cuz loyal customers"
Also Apple: "dOwNLoAD aPPle MUsIc oN Your aNDROiD"
Maybe so but if you send an iMessage with a picture and it goes as an SMS then you have to pay. Using WhatsApp is so much less hassle and free. Seriously, in the media etc everybody talks about WhatsApp groups etc - it is the messaging system in the UK.You can replace WhatsApp with iMessage or any other messaging app and it works the same. I have only heard of WhatsApp in this forum. Telegram, Signal, Discord, Skype, and Messages are all used to an extent with Discord being the biggest cross platform one. Messages is built into the iPhone, anyone not with a iPhone can get one for less than £30 a month or they automatically send and receive SMS messages.
iMessage is just a progressive enhancement of a SMS.
In other news, water is wet. What exactly does this have to do with Epic and the App Store? If the point here is to prove that Apple operates a walled garden... everyone already knew that. That’s literally Apple’s entire business model.
Oh, I see. I still don't see how Epic has any chance of winning this lawsuit though. Seems they've just hurt themselves by getting Fortnite kicked off with idea that they are some kind of "freedom fighters" against big bad Apple. Anyways didn't Epic try to start its own monetized App store? Epic doesn't hate walled gardens, they want one of their own.Apple has always claimed that it's "walled garden" limitations are made with the rationale of safeguarding its users' privacy and security. Epic is arguing that this is only a facade and Apple has ulterior motives, in the case of iMessage locking users into their ecosystem by making it less practical to use other ecosystems.
So far, nothing is "illegal": Apple has definitely the right not to port iMessage to other platform, but I guess Epic's main goal was to build up its argument that Apple's ecosystem limitations can be decided not in the interest of the users but to protect Apple's business foremost.
Oh, I see. I still don't see how Epic has any chance of winning this lawsuit though. Seems they've just hurt themselves by getting Fortnite kicked off with idea that they are some kind of "freedom fighters" against big bad Apple. Anyways din't Epic try to start its own monetized App store? Epic doesn't hat walled gardens, they want one of their own.
You clearly don’t have a clue as to the convenience and privacy that comes with using iMessage.I will never understand how iMessage of all things locks people to iOS
It’s not even that good
I happen to like iMessage, think it's good for my needs and have no desire to leave, but the answer here is easy. Convenience almost always beats quality.I will never understand how iMessage of all things locks people to iOS
It’s not even that good
The iPhone 10 and up allows for physical SIM and e-sim. I've have had 2 SIMS for a while and you can easily switch numbers you send/call from you can even assign different out going numbers to your contacts.Unfortunately iMessage sucks. Reason: you can’t put in another SIM card (important if you’re abroad and need internet) and just use it with your normal phone number. iMessage always wants to change your number.
I use both Signal and iMessage, but Signal for calls is terrible. FaceTime video and audio provide great call quality.I don't understand people.
They use iMessage which works only on Apple devices.
They use Whatsapp that is owned by EvilBook and breaches privacy as much as it can.
They don't use Signal which is free, protect privacy, and works on most systems out there.
Obviously that's why. The security argument is mostly a farce.Epic's argument is that Apple's walled garden limitation which prohibits installing applications outside of the Apple's App Store is not made mainly with the rationale of protecting the users' privacy and security but first and foremost to protect Apple's own App Store from competition.
Yeah, I don't they're gonna succeed with that. Apple is not going to allow third-party stores, ever.Epic needs to successfully argue that Apple has enough market power to be able to distort competition and that said limitation is indeed unfair to competitors if they want to prevail. Whether Epic will be successful or not is too early to say IMHO.
I'm also from Germany, and for my friends and family I use iMessage exclusively except for two people I chat with. For those I use Telegram. Never had WhatsApp, never will use it.Let me guess, you're from the US?
I'm from Europe (Germany) and WhatsApp is the standard here. Some people jumped to Telegram/Signal due to privacy concerns and a growing dislike of Facebook but nobody I know uses iMessage precisely due to it being limited to iOS devices.
Android devices are popular here so you won't even reach half your friends with iMessages and nobody wants to use seperate messaging apps for different friends.