Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Remember it is a server machine. The highest end cpu, if you bought it cheap like at NewEgg, would still cost you almost $3k. And that is JUST for the bare CPU. So the machine is not overpriced, it is just made up of very expensive components.

Highest end CPU - $2,750: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116925

Highest end GPU (and there are two of these in the Mac Pro) - 2 x $2,200 == $4,400: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814105004

Memory highest end - 4 x $210 == $840: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820239756

PCI-e based Flash drive highest end - $1000: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226455

Add that up $2,750 + $4,400 + $840 + $1000 == $8990 without tax or extended warranty

Mac Pro cost highest end without tax or extended warrant $9,599.

So the Apple markup is only 7%, and that isn't even counting the cost of the motherboard or external case. So it isn't that expensive if you sum up the cost of its parts. In fact it looks like Apple barely does better than breaking even, not counting their discount for ordering the same parts in bulk.

Oh and FYI it isn't about the pre-turbo Mhz, that doesn't matter at all. If you buy a 12 core machine and are only using 2 or 4 cores then it will turbo up in real-time up to 3.5 GHz. The 3.7 GHz quad-core cpu is already maxed out, the frequency doesn't go higher when it goes into turbo mode. So there is no excuse not to max out the cpu core count other than cost - not only does the 12-core use less energy and generate less heat in idle versus the 4-core but when the 12-core cpu is using only 4 cores and each core is under full stress it is running at nearly the same speed as the 4-core processor under full stress.
Why would a "Server" need dual GPUs? We don't even use the one on ours.

----------

Wow... 1TB Flash for $800 :)
That's cause you already bought 256 in the base configuration.
 
How'd you manage that? I configured one with everything I could, including two monitors, apple care and every possible keyboard and cable, and could only get it to 20,196.97.

My actual ordered config is:

1TB PCIe-based flash storage
Dual AMD FirePro D500 GPUs with 3GB of GDDR5 VRAM each
Accessory Kit
User's Guide (English)
3.5GHz 6-core with 12MB of L3 cache
12GB (3x4GB) of 1866MHz DDR3 ECC

Ordered 32 GB RAM from Crucial. Slightly cheaper and I can keep the 12 GB in case anything goes wrong with the Crucial.

I added everything :D
 
Apple seems.....

to have delivered a truly remarkable product....Three years and so in the making.....Waiting to see firsts real world benchmarks.....:D


:):apple:
 
this is the second coming of Christ to some of you

Not quite that important but as the owner of a professional media design firm, this product will speed up our workflow tremendously. We constantly render AVC-Intra100, 4k, RAW, MPEG video. We composite layers of media in After Effects and spit out four 30 minute TV shows per week. We have render offline HD footage for assistant editors non-stop and multiclip 6-8 cameras on typical productions. Yes, we have been waiting for this product as our entire ecosystem is Apple based. Dropping $10k on a machine that will help us make $250k in revenue... idiot proof.
 
Not quite that important but as the owner of a professional media design firm, this product will speed up our workflow tremendously. We constantly render AVC-Intra100, 4k, RAW, MPEG video. We composite layers of media in After Effects and spit out four 30 minute TV shows per week. We have render offline HD footage for assistant editors non-stop and multiclip 6-8 cameras on typical productions. Yes, we have been waiting for this product as our entire ecosystem is Apple based. Dropping $10k on a machine that will help us make $250k in revenue... idiot proof.

As the owner of a post production facility... this.

The old Mac Pros never had quite enough slots for us (for DaVinci Resolve — 2x GPUs, video I/O, RAID controller, RedRocket), and as a consequence of this and of the fact that Apple didn't ship a real Mac Pro update last year, we started pushing Windows into production roles... and, well, I won't go into all the details, but people who say things like "Well, once you're in the app it doesn't matter what OS you're running!" are living on Mars, as far as I can tell. First off, we saw many more performance oddities in Windows (tasks that didn't run as fast as they should on the hardware, etc.), and secondly, "once you're in the app" doesn't really reflect the reality of managing terabytes of data across workflows that span multiple apps and computers, include the use of custom in-house workflow tools, etc.

This new Mac Pro just makes all of our problems — both with the old Mac Pro and with Wintel systems — go away. Massive on-board GPU power, 20 Gbps Thunderbolt that's more than fast enough for storage and video I/O, and it's a complete, supported, integrated solution from a vendor that sweats the details. So it costs a couple thousand more than a DIY Wintel box with similar performance? OK, over the course of its life it will be used to produce hundreds of thousands of dollars of billable client work. If it makes that process a little smoother, a little more reliable, it's absolutely worth the price of admission. If it saves me a few hours a month of troubleshooting, it's absolutely worth the price of admission. And, once it eventually gets replaced in the role of handling real-time color grading and massive render and transcode jobs, it probably has another two or three years of life left in it in one of our offline edit suites, where we could never deploy Windows systems because the clients who rent them almost universally all want Macs.

The fact that all of this comes in a tiny, quiet package that I can toss in a camera bag and take on location is just icing on the cake.
 
Why would a "Server" need dual GPUs? We don't even use the one on ours.

----------

Hmm ... quote parsing not working for this message.

You don't use the GPU on your server because why ... too smart to take advantage of the extra computing power are you? LMAO! You have never used OpenCL have you ... or Intel Xeon Phi, which is really just a high-end GPU repackaged for offload of general purpose processing. In some ways the GPUs are MORE powerful than the core CPU, so my question is, WHY AREN'T YOU USING YOUR GPU?!

My point is still 100% valid - it is worth the money and at least for the highest end configuration Apple's margin is low (less than 10%). Sure if you don't know anything about OpenCL and don't think you'll take full advantage of even one of the two graphics cards then sure it is a ripoff, but if you are into high-end graphics or at least know how to use OpenCL then again it is worth it.
 
Last edited:
I just ordered a fully maxed out one! Can't wait!
Dispatch in January. Too long to wait!

2.7GHz 12-core with 30MB of L3 cache
64GB (4 x 16GB) of 1866MHz DDR3 ECC
1TB PCIe-based flash storage
Dual AMD FirePro D700 GPUs with 6GB of GDDR5 VRAM each

Only thing I want now is for apple to release their own 4k screens or new thin thunderbolt screens.
 
I noticed two rather bizarre option selection groupings that just don't make a whole lot of sense to me...

While I appreciate Apple including a 4k display, its a little weird that they force monitor one to be only an Apple Cinema Display and option two to be only the 4k Sharp display. There's no option for both being the Apple Cinema Display or both being the 4k Sharp Display?!? That's very, very odd...since I'm sure a lot of people like me still use dual cinema displays even though its lacking the 4k resolution.... Just weird...

Also, I noticed when I configure iMacs, I have the option for purchasing a Magic Mouse AND an Magic Trackpad together but don't have that option on a MacPro., its either one or the other.....and that's a litle Weird... Its just something I noticed....

Someone may have said it already since this was a few pages back but what's stopping you from buying a second TB display if you want one? It's not like its discounted when included with the mac pro, it'll cost exactly the same. If you want 2 than bundle one with the mac pro and purchase the other separate.

I will admit though, I don't believe you can buy the 4k display from apple on its own and I think buying a magic trackpad separate would cost more
 
I think there's going to be some many threads on this that either love or hate it. I see on the customization factor is going to be a huge negative for a lot of people, but the professionals should really see great increases in productivity with the speeds these should achieve.
 
If you mean I don't get why Apple (and pretty much all other multinationals) charge what looks to be a significant premium in Europe and other places, you're right. My only theory at the moment is that they're simply charging what the market will bear.

Yeah, cause the 2+ minimum warranties imposed by your countries don't add any support costs:

http://www.apple.com/uk/legal/statutory-warranty/


There is no way to configure it with only one graphics card. What if you are a sound professional and not a video guru?

The idea seems to be that spare gpu cycles will be utilized for boosting CPU type tasks, that CPU development is running out of steam and this is the first in a sea change away from CPU dependency. But we're all waiting to see what that actually looks/works like.


Is a musician going to buy this and give up their special audio card?

It's a bit calculated, but seems to me apple is hoping the shops making the audio cards switch over to TB connected audio boxes - making TB the new connection standard and opening up options like portable workstations.
 
A maxed out Mac Pro for 9,600€???

Why the surprise? Maxed out MP has always cost in that ballpark, sometimes even more. And much of that cost is ram and storage, same as it has always been.

Intel doesn't sell the Xeon E5 v2 in a BGA configuration meant for soldering?

Plus just looking at the machine, the screws on the CPU mount look like socketed instead of soldered. But we should know soon enough when they start doing tear downs.

I'm skeptical about the claim the SSD can't be replaced, it's obviously in a socket and held by one screw, should be an easy replacement.

I think it's interesting that the MacPro isn't even advertised on the Mac homepage. Pre iPhone/iPad, who would've imagined that a new high end pro machine from Apple would be relegated to the inner pages?

You mean on the apple home page? On the mac page it has two big mentions.


I don't think that word means what you think it means.
 
Remember it is a server machine. The highest end cpu, if you bought it cheap like at NewEgg, would still cost you almost $3k. And that is JUST for the bare CPU. So the machine is not overpriced, it is just made up of very expensive components.

Add that up $2,750 + $4,400 + $840 + $1000 == $8990 without tax or extended warranty

Mac Pro cost highest end without tax or extended warrant $9,599.

You failed to mention the 1,500 Thunderbolt box which would make your mac system 11,099. Most High end users use special cards. Video, audio etc.

A high end pro user may have their own video card and not need the Fire pros. I have a red card. A person using the Adobe suite would want a Cuda card which is much cheaper. So thats - 4,400

The adjusted self made system price = 4600

Even if you add 2 the GeForce GTX TITAN SuperClocked 6GB cards for 1,019 each, a self made system is about 6840

Your still well below Apples price.

I'm not saying Apples machine isn't fast. I'm saying its over priced and not suitable for a high end user who would spend money for the top of the line system. Its basically a Mac Min on crack, speed and steroids
 
Actually nobody needs this machine!

Even trolls need to come out from under the bridge from time to time. A little sunlight and meeting some real humans might do you some good.

Wouldn't a 3.5 GHz quad-core i7 iMac be plenty for that?

Nope.

Get a Thunderbolt chassis for your audio cards.

That wasn't the question. Some audio folks need a chassis for PCIe support, some are using alternatives running via firewire, usb, or TB. The point is that for anyone using software that isn't GPU heavy you're paying for GPU power that won't be used.

It uses a new PCIe based interface not mSATA so there is currently no compatible SSD out there, period. This may change in the future but it really depends because Apple isn't using a "standard" sized stick. They are doing what Apple does best so there is no telling if 3rd party sticks will fit (they likely will not).

The macbook air didn't use standard SSD cards but third parties released replacement drives within a couple months. I don't see why it would be any different with the mac pro. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple adopts the same form factor SSD for other models as well such as the iMac or the mini.

Is a musician going to buy this and give up their special audio card?

The smart ones knew what was coming and switched from cards to firewire or USB boxes years ago.
 
Why would a "Server" need dual GPUs? We don't even use the one on ours.

----------

Hmm ... quote parsing not working for this message.

You don't use the GPU on your server because why ... too smart to take advantage of the extra computing power are you? LMAO! You have never used OpenCL have you ... or Intel Xeon Phi, which is really just a high-end GPU repackaged for offload of general purpose processing. In some ways the GPUs are MORE powerful than the core CPU, so my question is, WHY AREN'T YOU USING YOUR GPU?!

My point is still 100% valid - it is worth the money and at least for the highest end configuration Apple's margin is low (less than 10%). Sure if you don't know anything about OpenCL and don't think you'll take full advantage of even one of the two graphics cards then sure it is a ripoff, but if you are into high-end graphics or at least know how to use OpenCL then again it is worth it.
You don't know what a server is or does, do you?
 
The macbook air didn't use standard SSD cards but third parties released replacement drives within a couple months. I don't see why it would be any different with the mac pro. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple adopts the same form factor SSD for other models as well such as the iMac or the mini.

My point was, the new SSD in the current MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac and Mac Pro now are all PCIe based. So far there are no 3rd party SATA Express cards that work in these machines yet.

The Air has been out since June 2013, so 6 months. Still no compatible SSD's. But now that we have all of these systems using the same stick it greatly increases the chances of 3rd party upgrades due to it being more and more economically viable due to the increase in potential purchasers.
 
!! Mac Pro Late 2013 Apple Support Docs

Xlr8 Your Mac has posted links to a bunch of new support docs at Apple. They are interesting in that they describe the full-support of Boot Camp on the new machine -- Windows 8 only though. So at least reference drivers for the FirePro GPUs are already there in Boot Camp. Great! :apple:

http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/index.html
 
It was a bad move renaming iChat. FaceTime was never a great name and it's even more awkward now.

I agree. What did Face-time mean again ? With iChat, you just knew it was something to do with chatting, but Facetime ? What the heck...

It almost seems like if Apple can make anything kewl... doesn't matter what the name is, people will use it.
 
I don't need more than 6 cores as Photoshop and Lightroom (my main apps) simply aren't able to benefit from more cores.

Most of the benefits will come from the RAM and PCIe Flash storage,

I have only 16GB on my current MBP Retina so at 64GBs this thing will already be a significant upgrade for me.

OWC RAM offerings top at 64GBs, if later down the road a higher capacity is available the RAM IS USER UPGRADEABLE so no issues there.

I considered the 1TB SSD but I already have all my data on a Thunderbolt Raid enclosure and currently I am using less than 200GB on my boot drive so I should be fine there too. Apparently it is not clear at this time if this will be user upgradable so you might have a point there but so far so good.

As for the graphics cards the D500 are already overkill for my needs but I decided to go with them in case I decide to start using software that can benefit from them such as the freshly updated FCP X.

I expect this machine to serve me well in the 4 to 5 years to come as it is, so unless Adobe pulls their head out of their rears and rewrite their software to utilise more Cores and GPU I should be ok.

Worse case scenario I can always sell it and buy a new one if it comes to that.

It is a real shame that there's no indication of better support from Adobe for 8 or 12 cores as I could have easily go for an 8 core one but as it is right now I rather put that cash towards a decent NEC display.

So you're telling me it is literally impossible for you to ever want to upgrade? This computer will last you for the rest of your life?

And that even if it didn't, it would be literally impossible for an upgrade to be more cost effective than buying an entirely new system?

How about we have this conversation again, but this time you don't lie to justify terrible design decisions that put form over function.
 
I see no lies in there, dropping money to upgrade a 4 years old computer is just silly for me too. If you have to upgrade your GPU, your hd, your CPU and your ram, why don't you buy a brand new computer? It could be even less expensive than upgrading sometimes.
By the way, ram is upgradable, ssd is upgradable, CPU is upgradable, and the GPU are likely replaceable with some cards coming in the same format.
Also if you think that's form over function, you have clearly no knowledge about the laws of physics.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.