Apple's Redesigned Mac Pro Now Available for Online Orders

Hope you don't ever want to upgrade or replace any components by yourself.

I don't need more than 6 cores as Photoshop and Lightroom (my main apps) simply aren't able to benefit from more cores.

Most of the benefits will come from the RAM and PCIe Flash storage,

I have only 16GB on my current MBP Retina so at 64GBs this thing will already be a significant upgrade for me.

OWC RAM offerings top at 64GBs, if later down the road a higher capacity is available the RAM IS USER UPGRADEABLE so no issues there.

I considered the 1TB SSD but I already have all my data on a Thunderbolt Raid enclosure and currently I am using less than 200GB on my boot drive so I should be fine there too. Apparently it is not clear at this time if this will be user upgradable so you might have a point there but so far so good.

As for the graphics cards the D500 are already overkill for my needs but I decided to go with them in case I decide to start using software that can benefit from them such as the freshly updated FCP X.

I expect this machine to serve me well in the 4 to 5 years to come as it is, so unless Adobe pulls their head out of their rears and rewrite their software to utilise more Cores and GPU I should be ok.

Worse case scenario I can always sell it and buy a new one if it comes to that.

It is a real shame that there's no indication of better support from Adobe for 8 or 12 cores as I could have easily go for an 8 core one but as it is right now I rather put that cash towards a decent NEC display.
 
Two configs

Will the 8 core be enough or is the 12 a must? Speaking now about motion graphics and 3d work with Cinema 4d.

Thanks
 
Will the 8 core be enough or is the 12 a must? Speaking now about motion graphics and 3d work with Cinema 4d.

Thanks

I've been reading that the 12 core is only preferred if you are going to be running stuff that will frequently be able to use all 12 cores. I went with the 8, but I'm more running data analytics stuff than graphics software.
 
Guys, I just chatted with Apple, and I found out that you cannot change the SSD if it fails... hmmm....

That isn't really what is talked about in the thread. You are asking for a couple of things there. One, is for Apple to sell you just SSD drive all by itself. Apple doesn't sell blade SSDs as retail products. It isn't for sale, but that doesn't necessarily means user can't change it.


The second was for some sort of replacement parts failed. Apple DID say they would replace it for a cost. It can be changed if it fails. At this point in time the only replacement is the Apple part and only Apple is going to change that part.

The major problem with that whole conversation is that it asks the WRONG questions. The question should be something along the lines of
" Is Apple using a standards based M.2(NGFF) connector for the PCIe SSD drive".

a. That has a yes or no answer.
b. It addresses the core issue of what evolves to be your rant of finding standards based replacement parts.


And SSDs have limited write amount, when you reach it, it will wear out - recently I made a research and for example one review talked about a higher-end SSD which had 700TB write amount. And that's it. Sounds a lot, but when you autosave your 3-4 GB files every 15 min.... it will wear out quickly.

Hmmm, 700,000/4 => 175,000 . 175K * 15 = 2,625K mins. , 43,750 hours , 1,822 days , about 5 years.

5 years is about the warranty you'd get on a higher end 3rd party drive.
This isn't particularly high at all.




So to make it short, after your 3 year protection plan is over, Apple may replace it for service charge.

There is no "may replace" there at all in the conversation. The might be feeling generous and cover by warranty anyway but if something is broken the standard Apple policy is that you pay for the part and it is repaired.

Apple's vintage and obsolete hardware support policy is quite clear.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1752



You cannot replace it yourself for sure, guy did confirm.

Right now there is no 3rd party replacement. What you did NOT do was lock down the viability of 3rd party replacement because you asked the wrong questions.


And there is no upgrade for a larger one either.

Again not particularly new. Apple doesn't sell Apple labeled HDDs either.


I had another chat session and they confirmed the same with graphics card: no upgrade and no "swip-swap" if you happen to need a better one. I knew I cannot swap it myself, but Apple will not upgrade it either - I got very specific answer about it.

This one is something that might be worthwhile for actually Mac Pro owners to feedback on .

http://www.apple.com/feedback/mac-pro.html


If Apple sold an upgrade service would you buy it in a couple of years. Would Apple consider doing that or not. Extremely few folks are going to upgrade insider of a year. This is one of those things where it may be possible to move Apple to a shift in policy if they think there is some very large substantial demand.

I doubt can move them into retail card sales but upgrades at a depot would cover the what is inevitably going to pop up ( an "underground" spare parts
market that will grow as Mac Pros die for various reason and get abandoned and sold onto the boneyard market as parts. )

....

And if it fails after the warranty, you have to pay for the service to be swapped and fixed.

In other words, what normally happens when a warranty expires. You have to pay to get it fixed.


That is very sad decision from Apple. Cost are adding up quickly.. Imagine, you computer may be down easily for a week if SSD fails (you need to ask for appointment, get a date, get there (there is no Apple where I live) they may not be able to fix it straight away, so you may have to wait a few days, go again......all this is money and time)

Or could be up in mintues by just removing the drive and booting off an external drive. Restoring from back-up would likely only be the time sink.


If I have a hard drive failure now, I just walk into Pc world, get a new drive, go home, swap drive, use time machine to get everything back. Less than 4-5 hours is lost - not to mention that we don't know the cost of repair..

Because you didn't ask the cost of repair. It isn't like Apple doesn't have service charges on a fixed schedule.

You also didn't ask if they were using standard parts. So you don't know.


They also confirmed me that no graphics card upgrade, not even by Apple !!!
So I need to know my needs 4-5 years ahead.. and buy accordingly now.
I am ok with D500 now, but who knows my workflow in a few years time.

4-5 years ago Thunderbolt didn't exist. Not sure why trying to evaluate hardware 4-5 years into the future when most of it isn't even being designed yet. The capabilities and the price points are all fogging crystal ball at this point.

It is also doubtful that the majority of your software will be completely effectively using the hardware in your new Mac Pro when you first get it.

As for your resource consumption requirements, if you haven't been measuring and recording them over the last 2-3 years that isn't Apple's problem.
 
Do you really read the words "user accessible" to mean that you can configure them when ordering????? Come on guys!! There are currently SSD's in place to upgrade MacBook Air's that were otherwise "un-upgradeable". Its not going to be the case here.... look again at the spec page.

This clearly says on Apple's website, "User Accessible".

Its not an issue for me, I can put this machine to work today as it ships, and it will save time and make my work easier. Enough said. Theres value in that. yes its expensive, but in the long (even in the short) run; it pays for itself.

I'm happy to say that I didn't see the "User Accessible" words in the left column so I hope that means what I think it means.
 
Will the 8 core be enough or is the 12 a must? Speaking now about motion graphics and 3d work with Cinema 4d.

Thanks

Does anyone knows if for Photoshop work 12 core is a must or the benefits are not that great?
I would like to either use the 6 or 8 cores and save $ome dough and use it on RAM and storage.
 
Guys, I just chatted with Apple, and I found out that you cannot change the SSD if it fails... hmmm....

So to make it short, after your 3 year protection plan is over, Apple may replace it for service charge. You cannot replace it yourself for sure, guy did confirm. And there is no upgrade for a larger one either.

If you're using a Mac Pro correctly, you would use the internal drive for the OS, applications, and possibly some scratch space. The rest would be thunderbolt raid 1+0 or 5 to a few TB of spinning disk. Your use case of holding everything on the internal SSD always doesn't match how you should use a Mac Pro.

Also, all laptops from Apple with SSDs have the same "issues" you are describing, yet I don't hear an army of people complaining that their SSDs are failing and they are losing data.
 
Dear lord... Please tell me you are not getting this as your gaming PC.

As I said in the post, "not the primary reason". I have an 8-core 2.97 GHz Mac Pro with Radeon 5870, 12 GB RAM, and 2.7 TB storage, which is running great. I use it mainly in research: Landsat image processing, and aerodynamic simulations. I'm not in the market for a new box for at least a year or two. Will upgrade the GPU when the prices drop a bit more at OWC.

But I also like gaming. Games are a great performance benchmarking instrument that really exercises the total architecture of a system.

So, looking forward to those benchmarks, and early adopters working out the kinks. :apple:
 
it's here :)

macpro_wwwmartinhajekcom_1.jpg
and
macpro_wwwmartinhajekcom_2.jpg


Well, sort of :)

Check out more over at my website - http://www.martinhajek.com/portfolio/its-here/ or get it here:
http://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/3d-model-apple-mac-pro-2013/748701?referral=MartinUtrecht
 
Does anyone knows if for Photoshop work 12 core is a must or the benefits are not that great?
I would like to either use the 6 or 8 cores and save $ome dough and use it on RAM and storage.

I presume these days Photoshop is optimized for OpenCL, so a 4-core would be enough for obtaining a great performance. A 12-core machine would be nice for a lot of virtual machines, for acting as an application server. I think Apple didn't design the nMP expecting to equip it with 12 cores, but as there are users paying for, they'll charge it with a big price increase.

If I needed an application server, a Dell tower with 12 CPUs and no CG-class GPU would probably be a more affordable option.
 
I have no idea why Apple STILL use AMD graphic cards. Nvidia is much better.

I disagree. I've always felt that AMD/ATI has always done better than Nvidia on the media playback side -- HDMI support, etc. In 3D gaming it's a see-saw battle year after year. Nvidea has a much better driver support team, and that means a lot. ATI has very good OpenCL support and OpenGL support. Nvidia has Cuda and PhysiX. Competition is good. :apple:

----------

If this is just about the looks, just get a poster of it. Much cheaper.

Really quite amazing how Apple's 'form at the expense of function' approach has sucked some of you in.

I like my stuff to look nice too, but once that buzz you get from the newness wears off, it's just a device you use. A year after buying this thing you're not going to be looking at much (if at all) or even thinking about it's design.

I can say that's not true for me. My Mac Pro 2009 has been on my desk with a nice ACD 24" and Harmon Kardon Sound Sticks for several years now, and I'm as pleased with the "experience" as the first day every day, including the nice design. I work more productively and creatively that way, certainly better than the daily grind of cringing waiting for the next Windows fail event on a crappy Dell box and IT shrugging their shoulders.

What you said is doubly not true for high-end autos. Try to get some enjoyment out of life and don't be such a pragmatist. :apple:
 
I guess if you really need a powerful computer for work you could justify it but with a maxed out machine and a 4K Display you are talking a little over $13,500. :eek:
 
Last edited:
Really looking forward to start seeing the Heaven 4.0 Benchmark scores being posted from these new Mac Pro's in various configurations and seeing how much ass kicking they will do
 
I think its really rubish the way apple have moved the ship date to February, totally not impressed.
 
Whether this also contains soldered RAM, Graphics Card, hard disk so that we need to go to Apple for upgrading after paying MASSIVE 3000$ ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top