I love it. Very responsive and I am actually typing faster with it.do you like the keyboard on your new mac book ?
[doublepost=1481115797][/doublepost]
There is a wide range of what constitutes 'professional'. So what you're saying is, if the current macs can at least satisfy the BOTTOM RUNG of what a 'professional' might do with a computer ... why then ... it's perfectly fine for everybody!!!
With logic like that, we don't need any other meat in the world other than chicken!
No, what your saying is basically that if you don't have a need for apps like Final Cut Pro, or apps to to do Video Editing, or write code then you can't be a pro and should just stick with a "basic" MacBook because you don't really need the extra power. Hate to break it to ya buttercup, but the word "Pro" means a lot more than that and in todays world is just a marketing gimmick to make you think something is more powerful. I need a dependable laptop and my 2011 MacBook Pro served me well for almost 6 years and still works well. I wanted something a little more updated and went with the 2016 MacBook Pro and it certainly is a huge improvement. The whole point of this thread was how Apple focused more on the iPad and not the Mac this year, not whether the MacBook Pro is for artists of business people. For me, my devices work seamlessly together, I can open whatever document I want on any of them, and with handoff just bring them right over. Couldn't do that in a Windows environment and certainly a long way before android gets anywhere close to that.
Just because a person doesn't have a need for these "artistic" apps doesn't mean they don't need a professional grade computer like the MacBook Pro.