I don't see what's wrong with the cheese grater tower design.
Yeah, there's nothing really wrong with the cheese-grater design, I suppose. Obviously, it can be a bit smaller these days as components are smaller and there isn't the need for as much internal storage, etc. But the fundamental design is fine.
They are making us believe that the new Mac Pro will be such a incredibly huge engineering effort that it will take 3 years to design it.
....
The new Mac Pro, if it's ever released, won't have more than 5 months of engineering effort behind it. The reason it has taken years is that they are trying hard, really hard, to get all pros into iOS and, if that's not possible, at least into the iMac Pro.
No doubt, unless maybe they have 1 person working on it, or something... and even then? It is kind of hard to imagine what they could possibly do that would require a ton of design effort. The Mac Pro (cylinder) was one of the more radical re-designs recently, and even it shouldn't have taken years unless they only work on it 1 day each month.
I think you're right about the iOS'ification that that is going on as well. I *HATE* all the tricky dialog boxes trying to get people to accidentally apply updates and such.
Common sense?
Go back to the cheese grater Mac Pro? Don't you remember what a nightmare it was to lift that super-heavy sumbitch while the sharp edges of the handles were cutting into your hands?
I don't need such a machine either (though I had a PowerMac at one point and loved it), but the pro users do. They don't care so much about how big or heavy it is, but what it can do and how it can be expanded.
And, when I say expanded, I don't mean in terms of saving a few bucks by upgrading the RAM themselves... but in terms of upgrading the GPU (or putting a real GPU in in the first place), or adding specialized cards or drive arrays, etc.
Yes, the hobbyists and pro users are considerably different groups, though both probably prefer a more 'cheese-grater' type setup.
[doublepost=1543731294][/doublepost]
People are hooked on macOS, they tolerate Apple's ridiculous way of doing things to get the ecosystem. At least that's how I see things nowadays.
Yeah, it's actually a pretty big deal to make a platform switch, especially depending on the software used (ie: if you just use Word, or maybe Adobe product, a switch is relatively easy... but with more specialized apps and workflows, it is complicated). And, then there is the matter of the other side of the fence not having greener grass too.
I am right behind you sadly, the new Mac mini priced at $800 told me all I wanted to know about where Apple is headed. In reality I probably should have known when they brought in Ahrendts. They've priced themselves out of my home unless they calm down on trying to be a couture brand.
Like you I don't rely on any macOS-only apps. I could, and likely will, switch by the end of the year.
OK, if that's your situation, I suppose I can understand a platform jump. But, I don't get your comments about the new mini. IMO, it's
THE machine I've been waiting for, and at a pretty reasonable price for what it is. If you bump up to the i7, it's like the 2nd fastest Mac made for well under $2k.
I abhor fashion, but IMO, the new mini was more a sign of Apple getting back on the right track again.
So I’ll pose the obvious question: How tech-savvy should a Win10 user have to be to take back control of THEIR hardware from a company that’s hell-bent on hijacking their machine and it’s data at every opportunity? How can you, having taken steps to break/block the worst “features” of such a compromised system, ever be sure that you found every vulnerability?
It also goes beyond that, too, if you're doing certain things like audio or video. From everything I hear, unless all the software/hardware is just right, everything doesn't work smoothly. Or, even simple stuff like GUI and font rendering or mouse-movement/interaction isn't as smooth as the Mac.
The closest analogy I can think of is the world of kit-cars and hot-rods vs something like a Porsche or BMW. Sure, you can build/design some really wild or faster things (at least along some particular performance axis), but you generally aren't going to have the overall experience or refinement.
I've also worked for decades with Windows (and DOS / Novell before that... and have built everything from servers to workstations, hundreds of them!), but every time I use it, I'm ultimately underwhelmed and have kind of a 'yuck' feeling. It isn't that I'm not technically competent enough to do so.