Lol, why? Have you not seen the size of your pocket computer called an iPhone?
Using MaxTech as your source is your first mistake. These guys are clowns.Doesn't seem too efficient to me. When also, the battery life is being affected. It's just a very minimal upgrade.
@GhostOS You forgot about the Apple Watch 7. Remember how disappointed people were?
Honestly by then I would expect an M3 (@3nm) 12” MacBook. And if the SoC is really improved with a newer architecture, that would be the computer I’d buy. Definitely.2023? 2024? Do you know how many of us will be dead by then?!
He was right about iPadOS 16. In fact, right on the money. We got a 'Pro mode' that was only only M1 iPads...it's called Stage Manager. He predicted it would offer windows, full external monitor support.I have to ask.. at this point why does anyone listen to Gurman? he’s wrong 80% of the time, and when he’s proved wrong he just says he never said that. Despite clearly saying it.
If it’s wasted die space it’s because you’re not fully using the full resources of the die and that you bought more capacity than you actually neededIt's great for someone making money being trapped in the ecosystem with applications that leverage GPU power under OS X. It's also great for canned benchmarks to show off for marketing.
For everyone else it's wasted die space that sits idle.
Depending on who you believe, the actual number may vary but in general most of the "trackers" seem to think he's right about 85% of the time.I have to ask.. at this point why does anyone listen to Gurman? he’s wrong 80% of the time, and when he’s proved wrong he just says he never said that. Despite clearly saying it.
In 2020, when we were all struggling with our i5 MacBook Pros scoring 4k on Geekbench with 2 loud fans, nobody would have thought possible to see a 11-inch fanless tablet scoring 7k without any trouble in a near future.The reason they didn't put an M1 in the iPhone 12 is the same reason they won't put the M2 Max in this theoretical 12" MacBook. There's no performance benefit because the extra cores would be too thermally constrained to make any difference.
The M1 already throttles under sustained load in the 13" MacBook Air. The M2 GPU is going to use even more power. If you put something in a 12" chassis with 20-40 GPU cores, you'll get almost no extra performance beyond the standard M2 because it's too thermally constrained.
Available screen area has huge use case impact. A 12” display has 27% less screen are a than a 14” display and 44% less screen area than a 16” display. The reduction is worse when you account for the impact of the notch an the space required for the menu bar.If they started making the Pro chips on a 3nm process they may be able to pull off this flex.
But anyone paying attention to the Apple Silicon devices at the time, such as the iPhone with the A13 and the iPad Pro with the A12X/Z chips, wasn't that surprised to see the difference between the i5 MacBook Pro and the M1 MacBooks.In 2020, when we were all struggling with our i5 MacBook Pros scoring 4k on Geekbench with 2 loud fans, nobody would have thought possible to see a 11-inch fanless tablet scoring 7k without any trouble in a near future.
Yet in 2021 they released the M1 iPad Pro, so I guess we can expect everything.
German doesn‘t “predict” anything. Gurman collects rumors from multiple, good and bad sources and then consolidates and publishes them without attribution. He’s a conduit for gossip that’s more often wrong than right.I have to ask.. at this point why does anyone listen to Gurman? he’s wrong 80% of the time, and when he’s proved wrong he just says he never said that. Despite clearly saying it.
I have the i7 (M7 intel) 12" and it runs fairly warm. I imagine it runs a lot hotter than a base M1 (or even M2) would now. My 12" M1 iPad Pro doesn't get nearly as hot as my 12" MacBook and I suspect most of the iPad's heat is from the screen. I don't know what thermal characteristics of future Pro/Max variants of Apple Silicon will have, but if they keep them under the Intel chips (maybe by using binned chips with fewer cpu/gpu cores) they may be able to pull it off. Even with the Intel cpu it still got great battery life so I would also expect to see improvements there too with perhaps a smaller battery to give it more breathing room and a square instead of a wedged case.Available screen area has huge use case impact. A 12” display has 27% less screen are a than a 14” display and 44% less screen area than a 16” display. The reduction is worse when you account for the impact of the notch an the space required for the menu bar.
YES !Do we really need a laptop smaller than the 13" offerings?
I think it all depends on the thickness of the device. If they keep it thick, maybe they can manage to put an active cooling system in it despite having a smaller screen size.But anyone paying attention to the Apple Silicon devices at the time, such as the iPhone with the A13 and the iPad Pro with the A12X/Z chips, wasn't that surprised to see the difference between the i5 MacBook Pro and the M1 MacBooks.
And anyone paying attention to the Apple Silicon devices of today, all the M1/Pro/Max/Ultra and M2 devices, would know that it's simply not going to fly trying to put an M2 Max with 40 GPU cores in a 12" Chassis.
The M2 Pro if it has active cooling, maybe. But nothing beyond the M2 if it's passively cooled, which a 12" MacBook probably would be.
I think it all depends on the thickness of the device. If they keep it thick, maybe they can manage to put an active cooling system in it despite having a smaller screen size.
As it is a system on a chip, you may not need as much horizontal space as a traditional laptop, but you may need some vertical space so more air can circulate to cool the system
Maybe it does today, but there is precedent with the 12" Aluminum PBG4.I do get what you're saying, but the idea of them making a 12" laptop with active cooling does seem pretty bizarre. Maybe it'll happen, but I would be very surprised.