Given
this, I would never allow Ring cameras in my home...
Do the privacy issues matter to you (I mean that seriously, they do for some and not for others)? If so, how are you solving the problem currently?
I'm not going to address this comment other to say: your privacy concerns are of the typical headline-driven fly-by-night pretend kind. I can absolutely positively guarantee you that you accept privacy violations on a daily basis that are far more egregious than Amazon doing product development.
It is annoying and obnoxious to listen to headline crawlers like you pretend to understand privacy issues, or violations.
No one needs to "solve" any privacy problems with Ring cameras. I'll sit here and wait for you to show me all of the examples of people suffering as a result of privacy "violations". I say "violations" because no one has ever demonstrated that any of what Amazon has allegedly done are even violations of anything. They are just headlines.
[doublepost=1559936175][/doublepost]
10-day worth of 24x7 video uses about 100 GB at the highest 1080p quality.
What? 1-day's worth (24 hours) of 1080p video is on average 172 GB. Compressed to hell it could be 100 GB. From
one camera.
In 10 days you're looking at 1 TB.
Which is precisely why absolutely no one should be uploading 24x7 high quality recordings to the cloud. Insane waste of bandwidth, even if you can spare it. Anyone feeling the need for this should just get an NVR system. They are higher quality, easier to install thanks to PoE, give you local, private storage...which you can remotely access and stream from anywhere. Reolink, Swann, etc.
I think most people who start to get into home security are being drawn in by heavily advertised smart home products, and actually have no idea what they're doing, what to expect, or what to demand.