Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Could not be less interested what Siri recommence, hints or not. Barely understands me anyway.
Does not feel right to promote some other companies product though.
[doublepost=1487157409][/doublepost]

Yep, even for "call my wife" Siri calls other random people 30% of the time :-/
 
So basically Siri can actively respond to someone quoting a line from a movie with a response about the movie.

MR responds with 'OMFG AN ADVERT IN SIRI MY FACE IS MELTING APPLE IS DOOMED WE SHOULD FIRE TIMMEH!!!1!'

Well, when I would say "Hello computer" near my phone I would love Siri to rather plug "IT crowd" to me.


But then again, anything I say has been said in one movie or another - so boy, Siri will have her work cut out for her
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Well, when I would say "Hello computer" near my phone I would love Siri to rather plug "IT crowd" to me.


But then again, anything I say has been said in one movie or another - so boy, Siri will have her work cut out for her

I was thinking more of Star Trek


If you prefer a more Monty Python spin:


Really wish Siri had a Majel Barrett voice.
 
Last edited:
I thought Siri was going to become something amazing when it was first released, however it's gone nowhere imo. I find it somewhat slow, inaccurate and hasn't improved in terms of understanding more complex sentences, and context and such. I only use it for timers, and even then there's occasions where I need to repeat myself several times or it takes like 10 seconds to process my request for a "15 minute timer."
 
Of all the companies, I never thought Apple would use their products to sell advertising.

I actually think this is pretty shocking. If I paid several hundred pounds for a product and it had commercial tie-ins baked into the OS, I'd be pretty pissed.

But honestly, do you say 'Hey computer' or 'Hey 'puter' to your phone? I saw the movie, and recognized that it was a 'Siri' voice and still never thought to do that. The only way you'd be subjected to this ad is if you were trying to engage it. I really don't think this is as horrifying as some are making it out to be. But that's just my opinion.
 
Do think its is a slippery slope though, hopefully Apple won't start advertising or using keywords in Siri

As long as it has a playful/hidden feeling, I think it is done right. You have to know the "password" to get Siri to interact in this way. She doesn't reply to your "schedule a meeting" request with, "Would you like to see Lego Batman instead?"
 
Care to give some examples?

Siri on my iPhone works for me across the room while the TV is on. I'm actually really amazed how accurately it knows what I'm saying. But that may be a different accuracy than you're talking about?
They probably have an older iPhone, as Apple has upgraded the microphones and noise cancellation quite a bit over the years. Combine that with someone who has a lisp or mumbles and who knows how accurate Siri is for them.
 
If Siri were a competent, reliable, efficient feature, I would probably enjoy the witty Easter eggs. Until then, the cutesy antics are infuriating. It’s like having a dumbass employee who thinks he can negate his incompetence by being cheerful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973 and samden
I thought Siri was going to become something amazing when it was first released, however it's gone nowhere imo. I find it somewhat slow, inaccurate and hasn't improved in terms of understanding more complex sentences, and context and such. I only use it for timers, and even then there's occasions where I need to repeat myself several times or it takes like 10 seconds to process my request for a "15 minute timer."
You're lucky, my 15 minute timers usually end up as 50 minute timers!!
 
A new low, Siri becoming cheap shill whored out to the highest bidder. Does Apple really need the few million in ad revenue from this stunt? Pretty lame.
 
I've never had a problem with SIRI except for trying to play Muse and getting News.
Maybe the problem isn't SIRI but the slobbering imbecile giving the commands?
 
How does something like this provide a reason against using Siri?
[doublepost=1487126199][/doublepost]
Seems like it just works for many people. Not that it can't be better or that some aren't having issues here and there.

Where it falls apart when using it with HomeKit devices. For example you have to say 'turn desk on' as opposed to 'turn on desk'. Also you have to pause and wait for the chime after saying Siri and before saying your command otherwise it missed half of what you are saying. The other issue is once it gets it wrong it is a royal pain to correct it since it is usually busy looking up your commands on the web. It might help to have an additional keyword for homekit instead of Siri, like 'Homekit'. That way it doesn't waste your time trying to google whatever it doesn't understand.
 
Care to give some examples?

Siri on my iPhone works for me across the room while the TV is on. I'm actually really amazed how accurately it knows what I'm saying. But that may be a different accuracy than you're talking about?
I kid you not, I once said "Hey siri, call mom" and she responded with "I'm sorry, I cannot find Shoes for Less". It only happened once but I seriously didn't think that a 5 year old AI could be so dumb until that moment.

Or I'll say "Set a reminder for Monday that I need to ___ at 7pm" and she will just open up the reminder app and not a single thing I said will be pre-filled. Or she will ask the time or the day or what I need reminded of. I'm glad she works for you, but the only thing I've been able to get 100% of the time is: "send a message to x" what do you want to say? "blankety blank blank" ready to send? "yes"

Heck, even if I say "tell joe that is funny" she will still fumble and send the full string rather than parsing out the text after the name.
[doublepost=1487178856][/doublepost]
Where it falls apart when using it with HomeKit devices. For example you have to say 'turn desk on' as opposed to 'turn on desk'. Also you have to pause and wait for the chime after saying Siri and before saying your command otherwise it missed half of what you are saying. The other issue is once it gets it wrong it is a royal pain to correct it since it is usually busy looking up your commands on the web. It might help to have an additional keyword for homekit instead of Siri, like 'Homekit'. That way it doesn't waste your time trying to google whatever it doesn't understand.

Wait for the chime? Most of the time I have to start talking as soon as the siri screen pops up because the chime will be the end of when she is listening and then she responds with "sorry I didn't get that". Siri is such a mess...
 
It used to work pretty well for me, but now it's almost useless. Misses very simple words and cuts me off if I pause for more than half a second. Apple has been lame-o-la lately.

I am aware that Apple has a lot of people working on many projects and looking to expand into future products and improve and further present products via R&D, however I am getting the impression that the construction of the new mothership has been felt across the board on the hardware and software side. I hope Apple surprises me once these growing and relocating pains have been addressed.
[doublepost=1487179815][/doublepost]
Care to give some examples?

Siri on my iPhone works for me across the room while the TV is on. I'm actually really amazed how accurately it knows what I'm saying. But that may be a different accuracy than you're talking about?

Siri has a challenging time with accents (British English), I have never had an issue with Alexa or Google. A voice digital assistance needs to adapt to its user base/customer, I am not going to change the way I speak so that Siri can adapt. I can understand if this was year 1 or even 2 for Siri, however it seems like a rollercoaster ride, it improves, it gets worse, it improves, then accuracy drops. I am not saying that Alexa or Google is perfect by any means, I just find those voice assistance to be more accurate compared to Siri.

Remember that the entire point of a digital voice assistant is to adapt to its user, not the other way around. Otherwise we have defeated the purpose of a digital assistant.

In case you are curious, I speak clearly and in a fluid tone. I understand that this may be subjective from person-to-person and this is why voice assistants have a learning phase. I followed the directions, Siri just does not want to feel the joy.
[doublepost=1487180705][/doublepost]
Why not since Siri is about useless for anything else?

https://www.reddit.com/r/SiriFail/

When Siri reaches a 80-90% accuracy rate, maybe then it should focus on advertising. I feel Apple is focusing on making Siri fun and there is no issue with that, however it's accuracy rate is just shameful.

At present Siri is no more than a gimmick when compared to Alexa and Google.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
I love stuff like this, haha. It's hilarious. But... can someone remind me why Apple spends resources on stuff like this but won't freaking release a new Mac Pro?
 
If Siri were a competent, reliable, efficient feature, I would probably enjoy the witty Easter eggs. Until then, the cutesy antics are infuriating. It’s like having a dumbass employee who thinks he can negate his incompetence by being cheerful.
It's frustrating because Siri is sometimes competent, reliable, and efficient. And then just when you've come to trust her, it's as if she gets rattled because HAL called her and cancelled their date and it's like talking to a distracted teenager. Sigh.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.