That’s different and fine print might help with that on what they can or might display. In general companies aren’t responsible for educating consumers, but yes that makes more sense when you state that and if the company doesn’t state the obvious then it’s likely they would get sued by one person eventually.Its not about forcing. I am aware and don’t buy everything these companies release. Its about telling people the real reason all these gadgets exist. Marketing is a powerful tool to manipulate people into buying expensive smart devices they don’t need and if you are in the ecosystem they make they product worse e.g. Samsung telling the Verge they won’t put ads on their household appliances a few months ago and now the 1000+ dollar fridge will display ads. I bet Meta and Google will do the same with smart glasses. Making the glasses cheap so people buy them, collecting as much data as possible, and then putting ads in your face. Also I don’t want to hear the affordability argument. People buy expensive phones every year and big tech wants that for wearables too.
In regards to the glades it’s possible at least when thinking of Meta and their past. With Apple it’s iffy but I’d be more receptive to using their glasses and not find ads or lack of privacy when they are pretty vocal about the topic. That’s not to say it can happen like any electronic and it’s up to the consumer to be well resounded on those topics and use logic in regards to it. You seem already be one step ahead of the average person based on previous posts