Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
LOL! That IS my day job... and I'm doing quite well thank you very much. :D

Your day job is making baseless stock predictions on Internet forums. I doubt it.

----------

It's more fun reading their foolish posts. They keep harping on your well worded statements, now they have lost track of what they were talking about. "So you admit the 920 had it first ?" :rolleyes:

That ones a classic since the 920 is not even a shipping product.
 
Really do you have to post Apple stock prices? Like that has anything to do with the ownership or use of Apple products. It's usually the cheesy Apple cheerleading Websites that post Apple stock prices in big fonts so fanboys who don't own any Apple can go "rah rah rah, we're cool".

Just a thought.

I always do a little cheer in my head when I see my shares up.
 
Back when Apple was $12.00 I had inherited a home from my parents. I was a huge Apple fan and watched everything very closely. I wanted to remortgage the house for $100,000 and buy $80,000 worth of stock and put 20k in the bank to make make the payments. I was so positive that they were gonna make a comeback. Although all the analysts insisted they were doomed, I had a feeling that with Job's was gonna comeback and pull his "baby" from the fire. The woman I was living with and engaged to, said that if I did something that irresponsible she would leave. I was just a bartender and how could I possibly know more than all these experts that said it was over for Apple. I began to doubt myself and I didn't do it. We ended up splitting up anyway...I always thought it was too late to jump in. I'm some special kind of idiot that's for certain!

25 years ago a woman told me "Weed or me." I too made the wrong choice. :mad: Never pick the woman when she gives an ultimatum.

I wonder what the price is going to go up to when they announce weekend sales, and the give the quarterly and end of fiscal year reports ?
 
Everyone laughed at me when I asked for AAPL as a kid for my Birthday. For ~10 years I got at least 1 share as one of my presents. Glad I made that call.

I wanted shares, but my parents procrastinated until 2009. Oh well, I still got some at $200.
 
Back when Apple was $12.00 I had inherited a home from my parents. I was a huge Apple fan and watched everything very closely. I wanted to remortgage the house for $100,000 and buy $80,000 worth of stock and put 20k in the bank to make make the payments. I was so positive that they were gonna make a comeback. Although all the analysts insisted they were doomed, I had a feeling that with Job's was gonna comeback and pull his "baby" from the fire. The woman I was living with and engaged to, said that if I did something that irresponsible she would leave. I was just a bartender and how could I possibly know more than all these experts that said it was over for Apple. I began to doubt myself and I didn't do it. We ended up splitting up anyway...I always thought it was too late to jump in. I'm some special kind of idiot that's for certain!


You're not a special idiot. You're like the vast majority of people reading this post, and the one writing it. In 1998 I, like most other people were predicting the demise of Apple, (thus the crappy stock price) and we were all wrong. But keep in mind that the turnaround that Jobs engineered was a once in a lifetime occurrence. The equivalent of winning the World Series of Poker with $200 worth of chips, while everyone else at the table is flush.

I love to dream about having sunk $100K into Apple stock in 1998. But who in their right mind would have done so unless their last name was Jobs? It's sort of like what Ronald Wayne, the co-founder of Apple said when asked if he regretted bailing: He did the right thing for him with the information in hand.

So did most investors who didn't buy Apple in the late 90s.
 
I have a whopping 6 shares i purchased at 664.
I'm now 200 richer :D


Hey, congrats! I stupidly sold mine a year or so back. Now, the only way AAPL helps me out is through my Mutual Fund.

I was a little uneasy on the direction of the company/public perception after Jobs for a few years but it looks like the marker has spoken!

I guess now the only way I can really get back in it and make some money at this price point is options. Unsure if I want to go that route.
 
Can anybody hear the Bubble about to burst? It will crash and it will make a lot of people mad :cool:

Not a bubble, but people do expect Apple to keep making big profits, and they do make big profits.

If you want to look at a bubble, check out gold, a yellow metal with not so many uses and a value of $1,761 per ounce. I don't know how likely this is to happen, but I'm afraid that it'll drop by 95% one day. Nobody would be able to see it coming :eek:
 
It seems crazy how the stock just won't level off. Not that I'm complaining...I make my living off Apple's success, so more power to em.
 
4. That's not iOS... That's up to the software developer. And since when is lack of ram a selling point?

No, it's up to Apple. Android programmers use Java, and iOS programmers use Objective-C. You know which one is more efficient. My guess is that Android is made to run on many different devices, so they want to use something universally compatible. It also makes it easier for newbie programmers to use Java.

----------

With no substance. This growth is based on pure hot air. Especially when Apple blows itself.

This level of growth is stupid, we last saw this sort of growth leading unto the dot com boom and the the big bust. This value of Apple has no substance behind it. The assets they have and profits are not enough to maintain this share price.

Low P/E and investment in technologies are not signs of "hot air". I'm just wondering what your source of knowledge is... maybe personal experience? Hating Apple overpowers the satisfaction of other customers, making it just over-inflated?
 
No, it's up to Apple. Android programmers use Java, and iOS programmers use Objective-C. You know which one is more efficient.

Yeah I do... it's sorta my job. Android doesn't use full blown JVM. We're not talking about phones with 25MB of memory folks...
 
You're not a special idiot. You're like the vast majority of people reading this post, and the one writing it. In 1998 I, like most other people were predicting the demise of Apple, (thus the crappy stock price) and we were all wrong. But keep in mind that the turnaround that Jobs engineered was a once in a lifetime occurrence. The equivalent of winning the World Series of Poker with $200 worth of chips, while everyone else at the table is flush.

I love to dream about having sunk $100K into Apple stock in 1998. But who in their right mind would have done so unless their last name was Jobs? It's sort of like what Ronald Wayne, the co-founder of Apple said when asked if he regretted bailing: He did the right thing for him with the information in hand.

So did most investors who didn't buy Apple in the late 90s.

Exactly. It was like trying to foresee HP for example make a turnaround today...a pretty difficult pitch to investors.
 
Back when Apple was $12.00 I had inherited a home from my parents. I was a huge Apple fan and watched everything very closely. I wanted to remortgage the house for $100,000 and buy $80,000 worth of stock and put 20k in the bank to make make the payments. I was so positive that they were gonna make a comeback. Although all the analysts insisted they were doomed, I had a feeling that with Job's was gonna comeback and pull his "baby" from the fire. The woman I was living with and engaged to, said that if I did something that irresponsible she would leave. I was just a bartender and how could I possibly know more than all these experts that said it was over for Apple. I began to doubt myself and I didn't do it. We ended up splitting up anyway...I always thought it was too late to jump in. I'm some special kind of idiot that's for certain!

What a story...but look on the bright side, had Apple not made it back, would you say the same? It could've been a double edged sword, you never know.
 
Your day job is making baseless stock predictions on Internet forums. I doubt it.
No, sunshine. My job is to make money. I don't have predictions, only probabilities and none are baseless. Mine says its more likely to fall than rise, at least in the short term.

----------

$300 iPhone 5, 50% margin, 2 million pre-orders = $300m. $8bn in market cap added. Hmm.

Bingo. I'll add that a lot of those are from people moving from their current iPhones. Its not 2m new customers.
 
I'm not going to repeat myself so I will only respond to some points.

2. Innovation? This has been around for decades... nothing innovative about that approach. Being integrated has its pros and cons.

4. Now you're talking about the OS before it was comparing Apps. Since Apple doesn't create all apps on their phone it is up the the developer to make them efficient. Before iOS 5 there was no garbage collection and developers needed to manually free up RAM... lazy developers could create really inefficient RAM. Apple provides a set of APIs as does Google its up the developer to implement them appropriately.

5. So you agree Apple isn't innovative, it's been done by Nokia... point here is I'm not sure we have the same definition of innovation.

6. Where is the INNOVATION?

7. That's weird my Android had usb-hdmi last year... I'll take mini-usb over proprietary any day.

Don't call people fools just because they disagree with you, makes your argument look weak.

By not repeating yourself you mean to say you can't respond because I've rendered your argument moot.

As for your other "points", I wasn't the original poster of the list but I completely agreed with him. You assume innovation is the invention of some completely new technology. How often does that happen nowadays? It's all about making something BETTER. Yes it is innovation when Apple takes the conventional processor designs (that everyone else buys off the shelf) and completely reworks it to increase efficiency and battery life while also INCREASING performance. How is that not innovative? I bet you are one of those people who thinks the "flip to mute" is some huge innovation. "WHOA I can flip my phone over if I don't want to answer it!!!" That's not innovation. That's a gimmick. Android users (and specifically Samsung users) are falling for that crap which is a shame. Android has a lot to offer, as does iOS, as does WP8.

Innovation isn't necessarily doing something first. It is doing something that effects the other devices/people the innovation comes into contact with by changing the way those other devices and people do/think about that specific feature/idea/component. In that aspect, no one has innovated more than Apple.
 
Yeah I do... it's sorta my job. Android doesn't use full blown JVM. We're not talking about phones with 25MB of memory folks...

You better not be talking about 25MB. More RAM than that is needed. I'm not trying to criticize Android for doing this since it's probably the best choice for Android. There are advantages and disadvantages of Java. This is why I like how iOS only runs on a few similar devices.
 
Last edited:
I'm some special kind of idiot that's for certain!

Actually, I think technology journalist/prognosticator John C. Dvorak has you beaten in that department. Sorry, but every time I see a story of Apple's remarkable success, I think of this:

1987: Reliving the Past and the Mac

and this:

Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone

and most recently (last week), this:

Apple's Not-So-New iPhone

Yes, John C. Dvorak is that "special" person you're talking about. Yeah, he's definitely very special. And amazingly, he STILL makes a living doing what he's doing. I guess PC Magazine and CBS Marketwatch have pretty low standards. Mr. Dvorak is certainly not in the same league as the likes of Walt Mossberg or David Pogue. Don't you wonder if he ever looks in the mirror and thinks, "What the hell is wrong with me?"
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.