This sentiment is the problem with most Studio Display reviews. Somehow, people have developed the impression that Apple could have just tossed in 120Hz and mini LED into a 5K display for $1,599, while neglecting that there is a grand total of zero monitors on the market with those specs.The problem with the Studio Display is just knowing what it could have been.
The displays on the 14” and 16” MacBook Pros are absolutely beautiful and I think people expected the same level on this display, especially for the $1600 price tag. Then they ask $400 more for an adjustable stand, and add a non-removable power cable..it’s just odd.
For that price, it should have all the tech from the MacBooks. HDR, 120hz with variable refresh rate, mini-LED.
Really a disappointment knowing what they could have done..
5K 120Hz is not possible over Thunderbolt, and "just make it 4K then" was never an option for Apple based on their well established Retina display strategy for a decade now. If you really want a 120Hz 27" 4K display there are many alternatives for you, just not from Apple.
On mini LED, please do share with this thread a link to a 27" 120Hz mini LED display in 2022 for $1,599. Many people would be happy to consider it as an alternative if you can find it.
Lastly, I am wholeheartedly in the "please sell the 5K iMac as a standalone display" camp and for that reason I am thrilled with my Studio Display. It's the exact product I've wanted them to make for years and now we have it. If you are thirsty for bleeding edge display tech, rumors indicate that its coming but just be prepared to pay at least double for it because your expectations are unrealistic at the moment.
Last edited: