Very much agreed.Agreed, its stupid and concerning that the dr office did not provide a secure way to upload the pictures. The app from my Dr. office has at least a secure way to upload files within their app ... still I would have to take the photo on my phone to upload it there and then it might still synchronize to the cloud (iCloud, Google Photo or whatever the user uses) unless I remember to turn off backup, take picture, upload picture and then turn backup on again.
However, triggering that alert is not my main issue with that case ... the problem is that Google refuses to turn on the accounts again even after aw enforcement verified that this was not child porn, no harm was done and all was good. What the hack? Locked out of your digital life and no way to reactive it even though you did nothing wrong? Full automation without human responsibility is the problem. Hope Apple will handle that better (remains to be seen)
I'm not saying that Apple do not protects customer privacy. But it's obvious that Apple send a confusing message when they talk so much about privacy, but at the same time they make business with Google to make their search engine default. Would be far better if they supported a service that focus in privacy, like Duck Duck Go, or even develop their own engine.If customers don't want to use Google Search, there is always the option of switching to another search engine, like what I have done. Though DDG is essentially a white-label Bing, and had its share of controversy until recently, I believe.
The thing is - Apple defines privacy as giving consumers the choice of whether they want to be tracked by developers or not (hence ATT). It's the people in these forums who choose to subscribe to their own extreme definition of privacy, and then blame Apple for not living up to those arbitrary standards that Apple never agreed to adhere to in the first place.
It's a straw man argument through and through.
And the annoying thing is that this will probably set the tone of Apple criticism for the current decade. From 2010 to 2019, the narrative was that Apple's ecosystem was too "closed" and limited and people would abandon their iPhones in droves for cheaper and more "capable" android handphones. But over the past three to four years, things have changed. Apple cynicism focusing on a weakening ecosystem no longer generates the views and clicks as people don’t buy it. People can see right through the cynicism and know that it is wrong. Apple is stronger than ever.
Instead, Apple cynicism has clearly shifted to focus on how the company is too strong, and too focused on making money to the detriment of the consumer. Everything Apple does is said to be done with profit (and only profit) in mind. If Apple tries to enforce its rules around App Store in-app purchases, the move is framed as Apple turning the screws on profit generation. Because Apple takes a cut from Google, they are not serious about protecting my privacy (which I maintain is categorically untrue). ATT is not about protecting user privacy but another way of generating revenue by means of selling ads. Apple is trying to gouge its users by having the MBA ship with "only" 8gb ram. Or force handset upgrades by not supporting the iPhone 7 with iOS 16.
So no, I don't think there is anything wrong with Apple taking money from Google (for the reason that I stated above). There is some sweet irony in that while Android has a larger market share than iOS worldwide, and for all the talk of how google services are presumably so indispensable and Apple would be screwed if Google were to ever withhold their services / apps from the iOS platform, Google still earns more from iOS than its own android platform, and has to basically pay Apple to ensure this continued access.
agreed ... btw: nice avatarProviding security updates for obsolete devices gets Apple a gold star from their customers.![]()
Android already does CSAM to any photos synced to the cloud, pretty much most cloud photo hosting companies/servers are going to do this. Check this out https://www.missingkids.org/supportus/our-corporate-partnersYeah. Privacy. Talk about planned CSAM and rumours about ads coming in.
If anything, it shows power of marketing, which Google totally lacks and fails on.
how are you so sure that iphones have better privacy than androids?Just goes to show that people who have money think that build quality and privacy are worth spending on.
Yeah, but just because they took a look into the AppStore revenue and saw that these devices still have old subscriptions running.Providing security updates for obsolete devices gets Apple a gold star from their customers.![]()
Have we got a phone for you!I'm not a fan of either Android or iOS. Both are not private in any way from US Gov agencies and departments and approved corporations. But iOS does have, at the moment, more protection against independent scammers than Android.
Too many android variations/skins vs iOS consistency and the time it takes for android vs iOS devices to depreciate
You also have this nice „Up“ model, that doesn’t exist in most countries
CSAM … you mean like google
It’s mandated by governments around the world. I don’t know why people seem to think that this is a thing that Google, Apple, Facebook, pretty much any platform that shares images themselves dreamt up.Whataboutism is not a defense.
One of these years maybe we will actually drive down to Dover to get them so they are truly $0 upfront. Just need to plan other stuff to do while there.This shows that when cost is less of a factor that most people will choose iPhone. In the US most phones are now sold with 0% APR carrier financing, so many consumers can walk into a store and get the latest iPhone by only paying the sales tax upfront.
Those might be the only two to keep it and possibly just houses. If credit were gone, companies would have to be way more competitive with pricing. A less expensive car may not be so tough to save for especially without CC debt, but a house you would have to save for as long as a mortgage to buy it up front.Sure, let’s do the same for cars and houses too!
Yes if we even did try Android again, it would be a Google one. Even our GS8+s bought shortly after launch were Oreo Coming "Soon (TM)" forever, and the security ones were slacking too.In the end, people are disappointed by the slow rate of Android updates on most Android phones outside of the Google Pixel models. At least with an iPhone, you get timely updates for several years (if I still had my old iPhone X, it would get the iOS 16.0 update).
you pay a monthly fee (on a 24 months commitment) and get to upgrade every year, by sending back the previous model. Samsung offers something similar in Germany.What does this mean?
In the end, people are disappointed by the slow rate of Android updates on most Android phones outside of the Google Pixel models. At least with an iPhone, you get timely updates for several years (if I still had my old iPhone X, it would get the iOS 16.0 update).
Android already does CSAM to any photos synced to the cloud, pretty much most cloud photo hosting companies/servers are going to do this. Check this out https://www.missingkids.org/supportus/our-corporate-partners
Use Microsoft cloud services? Google cloud services? anything Meta related? what about TikTok? Ever upload any youtube videos? Upload to Reddit? Twitter? guess what CSAM was used there are plenty more and I don't think you fully understand how exactly CSAM works. Google probably has the most invasive version of CSAM given the most recent with a man sending an image(s) to his kids doctor for diagnosis. Just to give you a little more info though https://www.theverge.com/2022/8/21/...-csam-scanning-account-deletion-investigation
Google alone reported over 600,000 cases in 2021 alone.
This leads me to ask....If Apple does continue to implement CSAM what are you going to do? Where are you going to go? because unless it is back to a "dumb" phone or completely no social media or cloud based services besides personally hosted ones good luck