Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The AT&T Trimline phones designed and built by Western Electric in the sixties (?) had a flexible printed circuit board. That is not something new, although at that time they didn't have surface mount components or integrated circuits to attach to the circuit board, just components with wire leads.
 
Sony, the displays' supplier, could struggle to manufacture enough panels for more than 250,000 headsets this year
So maybe the reason why apple is reducing its forecast of order is due to the availability of the 4K screens. Effectively they cannot produce more headset than the screens so this directly reduce the sales forecast.

Last news was for around 150’00 units (for this year?).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost31
Recall the story that the iPhone Jobs introduced had been rushed to get it to stage and there were fears it was going to crash/fall apart - literally last minute wing and a prayer, if it's true.

Regardless, at $3,000 it's not going to change the world immediately. Give it 2-3 versions and drop the price for mainstream adoption if it truly is the next big thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Too bad the renders don’t look like this.

46f0c4d7fbf0d181b0a474a071e99b70.jpg
Apple should work on that Siri Communicator.
 
A lot of these points are ridiculous, and grasping at things. How do you know the iPhone was hard to produce? You say there were a billion phones sold in 2006, but nobody is buying VR headsets. And $599 is a lot different than $3,000.

The entire point of Steve's iPhone debut is that phones up to that point were pretty terrible to use, and this one device merged the success of the iPod with an easy to use, powerful phone, alongside a breakthrough in mobile web browsing.

This device is looking to answer a problem nobody really cares about. That's why VR isn't selling well right now. It's isolating, and nobody wants it.
This seems to be one of those products that tries to solve a problem that doesn’t exist but marketing will tell us, we need it.
Every totally-new hardware platform is looking to answer a problem nobody really cares about.

No one cared about a PC, cellphone, TV, or game console for the first decade those were on the market.
 
Or the TVs industry imagine having 200 inch tv in your pocket and can use it anywhere.
Doubtful (for the foreseeable future). The price point is too high. $3K for a big screen TV that all four members of the family can watch is reasonable (although still expensive for most people). $12K for that same family of four to each have a headset is 0.1%er territory.
 
It has fab screen and many cameras but in description it just mentions left and right speakers hope they are good would like surround sound experience with movies
 
False, revisionist “history.”
It's always weird seeing revisionists bring out the 'revisionist history' argument when they themselves are the ones who spark it. That would be you, incase it isn't obvious.

Home PCs from every company were seen as useless throughout the 1970s and 1980s. This is historical fact and documented very well.
 
Here is what we know so far:
  1. It's difficult to manufacture
  2. Software has been difficult to tailor for it
  3. Many executives seem to doubt market penetration and success
  4. Potential competitors have struggled in the market to grow
  5. It will be prohibitively expensive, putting it outside of average consumer affordability
  6. Not very portable, making it useless in a public use case outside of the home
  7. Most software made for the device category has been video gaming or severely niche industries requiring post-graduate education and government licensing.
So, how is this the next iPhone?
Imagine, ticket prices for the U2 performances at the MSG Sphere in Las Vegas start at $995 and go up as high as $1495 per ticket, with VIP packages costing even more... what if you can have the same experience over and over in your own head?
 
a lot of people did. plus there were already mp3 players that held lots of songs before the ipod.

The point I was trying to make is when iPod was first announced a lot people rhetorically posed the question; ""Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?", believing no one, and therefore it was going to be a flop.

I'm getting the same vibe here with Apple's upcoming AR device.
 
Imagine, ticket prices for the U2 performances at the MSG Sphere in Las Vegas start at $995 and go up as high as $1495 per ticket, with VIP packages costing even more... what if you can have the same experience over and over in your own head?
So, I have to spend $3000 to then pay $1495 to watch it at home?

Or, I could go on YouTube and just watch it for free there?
 
The point I was trying to make is when iPod was first announced a lot people rhetorically posed the question; ""Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?", believing no one, and therefore it was going to be a flop.

I'm getting the same vibe here with Apple's upcoming AR device.

I don’t recall anyone saying that. I bought a first generation iPod and the demand for large storage capacity players that could fit in your pocket was very high.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: klasma and arkitect
Imagine, ticket prices for the U2 performances at the MSG Sphere in Las Vegas start at $995 and go up as high as $1495 per ticket, with VIP packages costing even more... what if you can have the same experience over and over in your own head?
Nothing going on my head would replace being at a live concert. Also, going to literally anyone else's concert would be better than having to endure U2.

The point I was trying to make is when iPod was first announced a lot people rhetorically posed the question; ""Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?", believing no one, and therefore it was going to be a flop.

I'm getting the same vibe here with Apple's upcoming AR device.
Everyone was asking for that. MP3 players were becoming popular. Apple just made it better.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.