And... "Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?" Flop.
a lot of people did. plus there were already mp3 players that held lots of songs before the ipod.
And... "Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?" Flop.
So maybe the reason why apple is reducing its forecast of order is due to the availability of the 4K screens. Effectively they cannot produce more headset than the screens so this directly reduce the sales forecast.Sony, the displays' supplier, could struggle to manufacture enough panels for more than 250,000 headsets this year
Apple should work on that Siri Communicator.Too bad the renders don’t look like this.
![]()
A lot of these points are ridiculous, and grasping at things. How do you know the iPhone was hard to produce? You say there were a billion phones sold in 2006, but nobody is buying VR headsets. And $599 is a lot different than $3,000.
The entire point of Steve's iPhone debut is that phones up to that point were pretty terrible to use, and this one device merged the success of the iPod with an easy to use, powerful phone, alongside a breakthrough in mobile web browsing.
This device is looking to answer a problem nobody really cares about. That's why VR isn't selling well right now. It's isolating, and nobody wants it.
Every totally-new hardware platform is looking to answer a problem nobody really cares about.This seems to be one of those products that tries to solve a problem that doesn’t exist but marketing will tell us, we need it.
Doubtful (for the foreseeable future). The price point is too high. $3K for a big screen TV that all four members of the family can watch is reasonable (although still expensive for most people). $12K for that same family of four to each have a headset is 0.1%er territory.Or the TVs industry imagine having 200 inch tv in your pocket and can use it anywhere.
The Macintosh was considered a waste of time also. Expensive. 128k. Mouse!?! Who would use such a thing?Is there even a big enough market for this? Seems like they're trying to be too ambitious for a niche market. A waste of time if you ask me.
This isn't a computer. It's a niche product. And an absurdly expensive one in a roller coaster economy, if we're to believe the rumors.The Macintosh was considered a waste of time also. Expensive. 128k. Mouse!?! Who would use such a thing?
False, revisionist “history.”The Macintosh was considered a waste of time also.
That happens a lot in here.False, revisionist “history.”
By definition it is a computer.This isn't a computer. It's a niche product. And an absurdly expensive one in a roller coaster economy, if we're to believe the rumors.
It's always weird seeing revisionists bring out the 'revisionist history' argument when they themselves are the ones who spark it. That would be you, incase it isn't obvious.False, revisionist “history.”
No, it isn't. You know exactly what I'm referring to. But thank you for being pedantic.By definition it is a computer.
It's always weird seeing revisionists bring out the 'revisionist history' argument when they themselves are the ones who spark it. That would be you, incase it isn't obvious.
Home PCs from every company were seen as useless throughout the 1970s and 1980s.
Imagine, ticket prices for the U2 performances at the MSG Sphere in Las Vegas start at $995 and go up as high as $1495 per ticket, with VIP packages costing even more... what if you can have the same experience over and over in your own head?Here is what we know so far:
So, how is this the next iPhone?
- It's difficult to manufacture
- Software has been difficult to tailor for it
- Many executives seem to doubt market penetration and success
- Potential competitors have struggled in the market to grow
- It will be prohibitively expensive, putting it outside of average consumer affordability
- Not very portable, making it useless in a public use case outside of the home
- Most software made for the device category has been video gaming or severely niche industries requiring post-graduate education and government licensing.
a lot of people did. plus there were already mp3 players that held lots of songs before the ipod.
Imagine, ticket prices for the U2 performances at the MSG Sphere in Las Vegas start at $995 and go up as high as $1495 per ticket, with VIP packages costing even more... what if you can have the same experience over and over in your own head?
So, I have to spend $3000 to then pay $1495 to watch it at home?Imagine, ticket prices for the U2 performances at the MSG Sphere in Las Vegas start at $995 and go up as high as $1495 per ticket, with VIP packages costing even more... what if you can have the same experience over and over in your own head?
The point I was trying to make is when iPod was first announced a lot people rhetorically posed the question; ""Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?", believing no one, and therefore it was going to be a flop.
I'm getting the same vibe here with Apple's upcoming AR device.
So a device that has all the compute on-board and can process, calculate, read/write data, display media, browse the internet, and so on - is somehow not a computer?No, it isn't. You know exactly what I'm referring to. But thank you for being pedantic.
Well, it probably is a waste of time arguing against people who believe in falsehoods, that's true.Non-rebuttal. You wasted your time.
Nothing going on my head would replace being at a live concert. Also, going to literally anyone else's concert would be better than having to endure U2.Imagine, ticket prices for the U2 performances at the MSG Sphere in Las Vegas start at $995 and go up as high as $1495 per ticket, with VIP packages costing even more... what if you can have the same experience over and over in your own head?
Everyone was asking for that. MP3 players were becoming popular. Apple just made it better.The point I was trying to make is when iPod was first announced a lot people rhetorically posed the question; ""Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?", believing no one, and therefore it was going to be a flop.
I'm getting the same vibe here with Apple's upcoming AR device.